Not proof but there is evidence for it, namely being charged. Grand jury said he might be the guy. They only see one side of the evidence, but that side exists.
But I never said the FBI's case was proven, and neither did Fuentes. He said there's no proof in these conspiracy theories and there's not. He's right, Ian Carroll is wrong.
I feel like you guys' emotions are overcoming your ability to actually read and think critically. You guys haven't contradicted anything I said or Fuentes said but you're mighty angry about it.
She is the victim and she victimized herself.
Never a clearer example of how victim culture is negative, it doesn't build anything, it only ruins things.
She's got two felony charges and of course she'll get off most of the consequence because woman, her life is much worse today.
I think there was a bunch of megalomaniac televangelist types at the top of Turning Point that looked the other way or maybe had a hand in it, like the secret service at Trump's shooting.
Is that the official story?
That's supported by actual facts.
Ian Carroll is saying there's smoke so that's the same thing as fire. Fuentes is saying where's the fire. Fuentes is right.
That's why you have to say 'if you think anything else then you're a dumb-dumb' instead of actually showing proof.
It looks really suspicious to you, but that's all it is is your suspicions. If you don't have proof by now you won't ever.
The attack was battery, but probably not assault.
Assault is an act causing a reasonable person to feel a threat of violence, but if you don't see it coming there's no assault.
Being surrounded by the blacks after was assault, because being attacked already he had a reasonable expectation of more violence.
Kirk was an honest guy, but he got surrounded by Televangelist church-cult types that were all about using him to get power.
When Kirk was assassinated their first thought was how can they jockey to get more control or influence. Maybe not all of them, but a lot, including this 'blood on the hands guy'.
Every once in a while a man wins in a court case like this.
But courts will rule against you any way they can. Example, if a woman keeps a written log of what her boss does and says that's evidence of a "pattern" then he's automatically guilty, if a man keeps the log they'll say it's just fiction made up after the fact and throw it out or a jury will just ignore it.
So you need to collect the best evidence you can and then you'll only win the most egregious of case, but you can win. But if they cartoon villain say "I fired him only because he's a man and I'm a man-hating lesbian" and it's just your recollection then you missed your chance.
Message is clear, nothing will ever change until money is on the line.
Lives in jeopardy from collapsing bridges? No big deal.
To stop the discrimination against men the men have to sue in court, not just the institution but the persons involved, and make them pay up.
If you're in a state that allows it, secretly record everything. Every interaction.
Oh what?! Where's the download link that's huge news.
Last I heard they just had to release info not under investigation so Pam Blondi announced "new information" and a new active investigation-coverup. If that gets shut down by public pressure they'll just classify everything.
I think she's just a Sarah Palin type.
Used to talking loud and getting her way at home and in personal life, because reasonably attractive woman, but in government you have to make deals and trade power. Gets frustrated she can't get her way and storms off.
I only glanced at her manifesto but seemed like tl;dr was "nothing changes, buh-bye"
It takes a lot more effort than a class project to write your compiler in a text editor you also wrote saving to your own file system where any mistake can crash your OS that you wrote. Few have done it.
Also I saw some of the code for my classmates' assemblers and while they compiled the test files they made Pajeet code look like masterpieces.
He says latest episode so he's talking about the the American remake Ghosts (2021-present) that's even worse.
I had checked it out only because the first one or two seasons of iZombie were fun. Mindless but fun. Well in iZombie they made the average-looking lead actress kind of attractive with clothing and camera, but in Ghosts they actually made her less attractive than her normal self.
There's only one kind of show that's purposely going to make their lead actress look bad - the worst kind.
I hadn't even heard of this person.
What's more disgusting is the wikipedia article; it's written like fan fiction.
Heineman and a friend traveled to Los Angeles to compete in a regional qualifying round [of Space Invaders tournament]
Person was living in Los Angeles so they... traveled across town. Riding the bus is noteworthy apparently.
It's one of these things where they spin it up to make the tranny look good because trans. Atari 2600 space invaders was about as hard as Pong, the competition mode had no shields so it was just doing the exact same thing over and over for two hours.
Basically "first video game rube exploited for company PR event".
Following the transition, Heineman lived as a lesbian
Wow. All that work to arrive at the same place.
In terms of the mentally ill I'm actually impressed with Terry Davis and his TempleOS - an OS, compiler, assembler, his HolyC C with shortcuts, etc all totally from scratch while schizophrenic. That's actually amazing.
The topic was gain of function research and the inevitable use of AI and biotech to create deadly disease even targeting individuals.
Tucker gets hyperbolic sometimes, but I don't think even literally it's a crazy proposition.
Technology gives individuals more power, so ultimately our only options are preventing any individuals from exercising that power or regressing technology or extinction.
For some context, anybody today with a few thousand dollars and some talent can print smallpox into a live virus. Future is going to get crazy.
You can save face to yourself, that's where cognitive dissonance comes from; you convince yourself that you 'won' the argument because of a 'gotcha' even though you know and everybody else knows that is absurd.
What you're doing is the same principle as a tranny putting on lipstick to feel pretty. It's just weird and gross, but you must have some thought going on in your head that makes you do that. Or not.
Nice of Jewtube to keep the thumbnail on the deleted video so I could find it on Rumble.
Case anybody wants to watch it.
Air show was in USA. Was this written by AI or are BBC doing some weird newspeak?
Apparently the printed part was claimed by the seller to be made from plastic that melts at 220 F, which was higher than the official part at 180 F, but whoever printed it used the wrong plastic so it melted at 120 F. It also didn't have a metal insert to prevent collapse even if it did melt like the official part.
So 3d printing wasn't entirely the issue except you're trusting a rando individual instead of a business that has multiple customers and probably at least one employee involved that doesn't want to go to jail.