Joel (((Shulkin))).

But it's just confirmation bias, I'm sure.

Schizophrenic people exist.

Marx knew the Jews god was money, but Jews embraced Marxism, killed the Tsar, and eventually overthrew the government. Marx was wrong. The Jew's god is power.

Just because some Irish judeophile pushed Jewish work a little further (and yes, critical race theory is almost entirely a Jewish work), doesn't get them off the hook. This shit goes back to the assassination of Alexander II and the embrace of terrorist marxism in the pale of settlement.

Pretty good analysis, though America would have to deal with the "South Africa" problem while somehow maintaining deterrence.

Ain't no ally of mine.

The mass exodus of eastern european jews, fleeing pogroms and landing in NYC?

A Mao type leftist force could only come about through a civil war. If it ever gets to that point, you better damned well be sure the left doesn't win, because that's when we'd get killing fields. Honestly, we might regardless of who wins, but better the right wingers be holding the rifles than kneeling at the ditch.

Maybe a bit, but this is looking like a weak leftist government. Good chance of a hyperinflationary cycle coming up. Right wing populism is going to explode when the economy goes sour. It's not about optics. It's about support. Hard times will create strong men.

Nah, it's shorthand for rough haplogroup. Similar halpogroups can, but not always, merge. Too divergent haplogroups conflict invariably. Arabs genocide Armenians. English fuck French.

Humans are factional. Race is just one facet of factionalism. It can spawn from ideology, but racial and ethnic factionalism always bubbles up, because the lines are so clearly drawn. Are you familiar with Politics?

There is also no such thing as a "people's immune response".

There absolutely is. It's sometimes called racism, sometimes called anti-semitism. Anti-racism is immunosuppression.

Incompatibility of culture comes from... culture genetic selection pressure.

Culture is informed by genetics, and genetics, in turn influence culture.

Ultimately, Africans, as a demographic group, both require and crave authoritarian rule to establish enough stability to have some semblance of civilization. Individuals can exist within the European framework, but as a population, they will destroy that framework, as we can bear witness to. Jews have selected to deceive and subvert, in order to weaken a host demographic and engorge themselves on it until a peoples immune response kicks in. While the Jew is adapted to European people far better than the African, they're adapted in the way of the lamprey.

You mean by the faggots?

Agreed. But a European has no more business being ruled by a Jew than an African has being ruled by a European. Incompatibility leads to conflict. It's natural. Inequality will always exist, but the greater the diversity, the greater the inequality.

Let Jews pilfer fellow Jews. Let Africans murder fellow Africans.

No, not really. It's because that one group stands out in many of the worst ways. They're the 13/50 of finance, academia, media, and policy.

He really needs to change his name to Gillberg. The SEC will completely forget he exists.

It absolutely is, which is why it needs to be normalized again, and the only way to do that is to show why antisemitism exists. The actions of Jews.

Yeah, I did at one time, but honestly, it's a grasp at trying to find some noteworthy accomplishment. Heavily Irish influence on those musical styles. It's like giving them zoot suits.

Pre-Reconstruction, really.

Name the Jew. Not with animosity, but with fact. Eventually, they'll recoil, and opportunities to roll back their corrupting presence will present itself.

Hart-Cellar destroyed America. Cloward-Piven destroyed America. The Federal Reserve destroyed America.

I wasn't naming Democrats. That's just a cohencidence. There are two R's in that list. Zeldin is a garbage. Kutsoff may or may not be terrible.

Neat-o. Totally makes up for...

Michael Bennet (D-CO) Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) Jacky Rosen (D-NV)* Brian Schatz (D-HI) Bernard Sanders (I-VT) Charles Schumer (D-NY) Ron Wyden (D-OR) Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)## David Cicilline (D-RI) Stephen Cohen (D-TN) Susan Davis (D-CA) Ted Deutch (D-FL) Eliot Engel (D-NY) Lois Frankel (D-FL) Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) David Kutsoff (R-TN) Andy Levin (D-MI)* Mike Levin (D-CA)* Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) Nita Lowey (D-NY) Elaine Luria (D-VA)* Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) Dean Phillips (D-MN)* Jamie Raskin (D-MD) Max Rose (D-NY)* Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) Adam Schiff (D-CA) Kim Schrier (D-WA)* Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) Brad Sherman (D-CA) Brad Schneider (D-IL) Elissa Slotkin (D-MI)* Susan Wild (D-PA)* John Yarmuth (D-KY) Lee Zeldin (R-NY)

That's two completely different things. Not to mention, I've seen very little resistance to inter-racial coupling.

It's a very cheap virtue signal that avoids some potentially nasty repercussions.

I've literally never met a single man that said he wanted to marry 'within his own race', of any race. It's just not a thing that most men do.

I've met plenty. That probably more a reflection of who we are as individuals, than any useful anecdotal evidence. Statistical evidence would disagree with your personal experience, anyway.

Nah. Most people don't support interracial relationships, beyond lip service, as evidenced by their engagement in them. This shit is so kids see it, and have a false perception of people from races that will probably steal their bike.