Incompatibility of culture comes from... culture genetic selection pressure.
Culture is informed by genetics, and genetics, in turn influence culture.
Ultimately, Africans, as a demographic group, both require and crave authoritarian rule to establish enough stability to have some semblance of civilization. Individuals can exist within the European framework, but as a population, they will destroy that framework, as we can bear witness to. Jews have selected to deceive and subvert, in order to weaken a host demographic and engorge themselves on it until a peoples immune response kicks in. While the Jew is adapted to European people far better than the African, they're adapted in the way of the lamprey.
Culture is only minimally informed by genetics. Any actual cultural impact from genetics is going to in along term evolutionary time frame across a broad spectrum. Human societies have gender roles because of genetic and biological imperatives. The difference between any particular ethnic group, it's place, and it's time are largely irrelevant from a genetic perspective.
Ultimately, Africans, as a demographic group, both require and crave authoritarian rule to establish enough stability to have some semblance of civilization.
Uninformed and assinine.
The range of cultures across the African continent varies wildly. If you're going to claim that something has an effect on culture, you should be aiming at the high number of man-eating predators, low amounts of protein, and geographic isolation; even then that only applies to specific regions.
Individuals can exist within the European framework, but as a population, they will destroy that framework, as we can bear witness to.
Again, this is nonsense. Not only do individuals exist in Europe, but individualism as a philosophy stems from Europe.
Jews have selected to deceive and subvert, in order to weaken a host demographic and engorge themselves on it until a peoples immune response kicks in.
Just more racist assertions based off of nothing. It's wrong from basically from every angle that you can take that sentence. There's no such thing as a 'host demographic'. You've ascribed Jews as inherently parasitical, when we know that they tend to form an independently wealthy & educated class in many societies, not based on parasitism but on saving money, work habits, and literacy. There is also no such thing as a "people's immune response". That is simply not a thing because that's not how humans interact with each other. Humans respond negatively to negative actions by other humans, they are not extensions of a collective summoned to action by some larger 'collective soul'. Your just making shit up at this point.
While the Jew is adapted to European people far better than the African, they're adapted in the way of the lamprey.
More ignorance. Jewish Communities have existed in Africa, possibly longer than they have existed in Europe. Again, not with parasitism, but with trade. Trade is not parasitical, unless your a socialist.
No it isn't, because most societies are explicitly not racially homogenous, nor do they even accept most western definitions of race. There is no 'collective soul' that responds to anything.
Humans are factional. Race is just one facet of factionalism. It can spawn from ideology, but racial and ethnic factionalism always bubbles up, because the lines are so clearly drawn. Are you familiar with Politics?
Culture is informed by genetics, and genetics, in turn influence culture.
Ultimately, Africans, as a demographic group, both require and crave authoritarian rule to establish enough stability to have some semblance of civilization. Individuals can exist within the European framework, but as a population, they will destroy that framework, as we can bear witness to. Jews have selected to deceive and subvert, in order to weaken a host demographic and engorge themselves on it until a peoples immune response kicks in. While the Jew is adapted to European people far better than the African, they're adapted in the way of the lamprey.
Culture is only minimally informed by genetics. Any actual cultural impact from genetics is going to in along term evolutionary time frame across a broad spectrum. Human societies have gender roles because of genetic and biological imperatives. The difference between any particular ethnic group, it's place, and it's time are largely irrelevant from a genetic perspective.
Uninformed and assinine.
The range of cultures across the African continent varies wildly. If you're going to claim that something has an effect on culture, you should be aiming at the high number of man-eating predators, low amounts of protein, and geographic isolation; even then that only applies to specific regions.
Again, this is nonsense. Not only do individuals exist in Europe, but individualism as a philosophy stems from Europe.
Just more racist assertions based off of nothing. It's wrong from basically from every angle that you can take that sentence. There's no such thing as a 'host demographic'. You've ascribed Jews as inherently parasitical, when we know that they tend to form an independently wealthy & educated class in many societies, not based on parasitism but on saving money, work habits, and literacy. There is also no such thing as a "people's immune response". That is simply not a thing because that's not how humans interact with each other. Humans respond negatively to negative actions by other humans, they are not extensions of a collective summoned to action by some larger 'collective soul'. Your just making shit up at this point.
More ignorance. Jewish Communities have existed in Africa, possibly longer than they have existed in Europe. Again, not with parasitism, but with trade. Trade is not parasitical, unless your a socialist.
There absolutely is. It's sometimes called racism, sometimes called anti-semitism. Anti-racism is immunosuppression.
No it isn't, because most societies are explicitly not racially homogenous, nor do they even accept most western definitions of race. There is no 'collective soul' that responds to anything.
Humans are factional. Race is just one facet of factionalism. It can spawn from ideology, but racial and ethnic factionalism always bubbles up, because the lines are so clearly drawn. Are you familiar with Politics?