Chauvin didn't seem surprised by the verdict, and the judge gave him massive grounds for appeal. Not trying to be too tinfoily here, but this seemed a bit like engineered failure. Considering the environment, I'm not sure Chauvin would even want to beat the charges right now.
Doubt it. The only "white" male was a jewish chemist. Then you had 5 white women, likely afflicted with white guilt. Then you had 4 blacks and 2 mutts.
The women and the jew were going to go along with the black men. The mutts were going wherever the wind blew.
The only marginal surprise is the West African immigrant being on board, but not a massive shock.
What came first, the ideology that rejects "the establishment" or the radical anti-establishment student? That would be an interesting thing to look into.
E: this was a silly comment I didn't hat time to extrapolate on earlier. I should give you more effort. apologies. i'll attempt to give you a more reasoned approach tomorrow (if I still recall). we have so much common ground, yet we have vast differences on how we get to it.
If you say 'many' assassins were Jews, and it's only one, I am pretty sure you are under a misapprehension.
Fair enough. Many members of the organization that plotted the assassination were Jewish (around 15%, but I can't find a source on that). That's in a nation that's less than 1% ethnically Jewish. Tends to stand out.
I assert that the overwhelming majority of Eastern European Jews had nothing at all to do with any radical ideology.
That's a fair assessment. The more pressing question is whether radical ideologues skewed Jewish.
I know nothing of that. Insofar as I know, they were very capitalist middlemen.
My understanding is they generally lived in small communal settlements in the Pale. Socialism was a way of life. The immigrants skewed younger, though.
Yes, they were God-fearers par excellence.
The cross means nothing to them but the symbol of a religion they're at odds with. Nothing to do with god fearing. By most accounts, they didn't seem particularly religious.
Anyway, the point was, it's a situation that creates some fertile ground for Socialism to take root in America, and seed bearers of the ideology. Organizations like the United Hebrew Trades start popping up. Later on, offshoots of the Bund. Yes, they weren't Marxist in 1880, but that was changing in the 1900s. They found success in textiles, and upward economic mobility, allowing access to education and academic fields.
This is just setting the stage for the Frankfurt School to find success in America, when relocated to Columbia University.
Okay, you're going to pick hairs, and I'll have to cite Narodnaya Volya Jewish membership (and other Russian revolutionary political organizations), and you'll say only one active jewish assassin, the organization didn't matter, then we'll have to discuss the socialist living conditions Jews were accustomed to, then we'll probably eventually get into whether Jewish Bolshevism was a thing or not... which sounds kind of fun, but I probably won't have time for this can of worms today.
Also, kikels, because they refused to use a mark that looked similar to a cross.
Just establishing a baseline framework. If were not on the same page on this, nothing else I'd say would make sense.
Marxism caught on better in the Pale than most anywhere else, for understandable reasons. Many of the revolutionaries that would go on to kill Tsar Alexander II were of Jewish background. That assassination was the catalyst for the pogroms,with many Eastern European Jews fleeing to America in the 1880-1920s. Particularly New York. They brought with them their socialist and Marxist ideologies, and set up some of the earliest Socialist organizations in America.
Are we still in general agreement?
Jews being members of something, and Jews being donors to something, does not make it a fact that Jews own that thing to advocate for their Jewish dominance in a race war against all other peoples.
Who the fuck made that claim?
You really need to stop putting words in other people's mouth. I don't like the causes Jews generally advocate for with their financial and media influence, but "Jewish dominance in a race war" ain't it.
But besides that, politicians live or die by their donors, and they're relatively cheap, for what you get. Are you really disputing that?
Probably not a coincidence, though not necessarily intentional either. The risk of sterilization is an acceptable trade off for herd immunity. There are too many people, and a reduction in birth is desirable. Herd immunity is beneficial to those currently living. It's a win-win.
Not my own personal belief, but it seems to be the way modern academics view the world, which spills into their fruits.
Nope, that was Japanese flesh in his Wallachian boipucci.