Between the two Xmen though the console versions of TMNT were actually better than the arcades in most respects (especially the genesis one).
While you didn't ask, I would recommend Alien vs predator and D&D as good beat em up games as they actually include combo moves for each character.
Sociopaths and egotists are always looking for reasons to do generally unacceptable things but in a socially accepted context. Its why so many people decided to simp for covid laws and draconian measures despite how badly it screwed everyone over because it meant looking good even though they were doing evil. They're not losing their minds, its far more likely they only protect free speech because its socially accepted thing to do but really do want to just plain censor and report people to ruin their lives for the fun of it.
It's doubtful these people even care if they actually helped anyone. They got to hurt people and call them pedos (even though they most certainly aren't by any practical metric) and that's all that matters. There isn't going to be a single child actually helped by conflating child rights with anime characters many of whom display non-child like behavior.
If anything it'll be the like UK where children are routinely abused because discussion is routinely diverted (such as running wild with the claim that the rape gangs aren't real because one accuser listed 3 innocent men she didn't like while ignoring the several actual child rape gang members that she did list). It'll only actually increase the amount of child abuse occurring while limited actual police and civil response to it.
In addition the guy who married Hatsune Miku got completely screwed over lol. He married the program on a limited time 3D girl projector system which got turned off permanently a few months afterwards. Leave him alone, he is legitimately a victim of live service bullshit.
What's weird to me is how self defeating the meme is. The news report on the left is massively inaccurate to an obvious comical extent while the report on the right has absolutely nothing actually inaccurate with it.
So like what is the intended message "if you like the f35 defunding you are the same as those who lie about the ar15 to get it banned?". What about the f35 being prohibitively expensive and unnecessary is a lie?
Funnily enough, the voice actor change for Soldier 11 is only barely noticeable (slight different in pitch and tone) while Lycaon is a major change. These changes were basically inevitable though since having these characters unvoiced heavily damaged the game's story quality (nothing quite like the chapter 5 ending sequence where all the major parties introduced show up to rescue the main characters only to have like 3 of the characters actually be voiced)
I also don't quite get how what they did stops AI. If having characters be unvoiced damages the narrative impact of a given scene, it only incentivizes the use of AI to replace you so that the consumer gets the intended scene. Voluntarily doing this to yourself is dumb.
What's the Canadian excuse? MAID, got run over by a horse, system so corrupt the only party that will actually do something different (even the "conservative" Pollivere won't stop mass immigration) the PPC is not allowed to have airtime and can't run in Ontario and immigration is so high and native population so low that we've already been demographically replaced.
We were 30 mill in 2000s. We are 40 million now with 500000 officially coming in every year.
It's Canada, the country was literally founded on misappropriation of government tax grants to railway construction companies that funded Macdonald's election campaign. Macdonald was the first PM BTW. I don't think there's been any significant period in Canadian history that isn't filled with rampant corruption. We're basically the Ukraine of North America in terms of money laundering.
Assuming representative sample it's 1 in 5 for all women of prime reproductive age and only slightly below 1 in 5 for those older than 25. The survey does state that the it all women sampled so technically the "yes report" count could be a lot higher because the sampling includes women who never reported because they were never approached (cynical as it is to believe some women are so awful they would report anyone who approached them). It is however telling that the survey reports men heavily fear legal consequences and rejection while women near overwhelmingly just fear the person not being attractive more than anything else.
The survey also says men will on average need to meet 10 women before a long-term relationship is established. So the average man can expect at least 2 women they meet to be the nightmares people they want to avoid before they find a single woman they will have a meaningful relation with that hopefully pans out well.
Unfortunately yes. Low alcohol consumption across the board, COVID lockdowns and limited reasons to go there (you absolutely do not want to involve alcohol while dating if you are worried about getting legally harassed later on).
"About 18% of all women in the sample and 22% of women in the age 18-25 group stated that they reported someone to an authority figure for approaching them sexually or romantically." - https://datepsychology.com/risk-aversion-and-dating/ I can't seem to archive the website
I have a 1 in 5 chance of having my life fucked over everytime I approach a woman. Well golly gee why don't men want to line up to get systemically harassed? Exactly how many women will a man have to approach to find the one for them?
So it's going to be Afghanistan again but this time we give all the equipment to the Russians?
Just to clarify I don't think anyone should stay it's just weird how the west isn't even trying to not lose billions in military equipment.
Also a literal no actual choices election because all the parties have the same opinion and policies just different platitudes.
And if you do get a party that has a different opinion like the PPC they no platform them and also prevent them from running in critical portions of the country like ontario.
"The People’s Party of Canada has been blocked from registering its name for a provincial party in Ontario by a Toronto man, who began running in election campaigns as a “Peoples Political Party” candidate years before Maxime Bernier created his national party" - Literally denying people the right to vote for this party over some no-name jackass (notice the journalist does not list their name) registering under the same party name.
None of them are honest with their beliefs. They're just doing it because Trump doesn't shoot back and they want to look good even though they're doing evil. There's not a single line from these morons about how Trudeau has made Canada weaker than it ever has been and how we'll probably identify more with India or Muslim in the future thanks to how bad immigration control has been (and how we still do not have any actual party that will do anything about it). All of our major institutions and hospitals run DEI. That's how bad it is.
TBF can you legally sell something that is worthless? China only buys canadian land because its a minor haven from their government and that clearly didn't work out for them either. There is no value from the country.
Source: Am canadian.
Demons are basically born and thrown out to go kill people and get stronger. They don't have families and they don't really give crud for each other. They fake human emotions and concepts to give them a predator advantage over their human prey.
I'm rejecting infinite possibilities to flat out state that its much more likely that something very unlikely to happen will not happen. That's not dubious. You can absolutely be confident that in the absence of infinite possibilities that something unlikely to happen won't happen.
Neither is it dubious to state the industry will continue to do what its already doing. Nor is it ridiculous to assume innate human qualities would be a factor in what will happen. It is not contradictory for someone to argue that infinite possibilities is ridiculous but then conclude that given 50 years humanity will never suddenly mutate into 50 armed beings and win mortal Kombat. The rejection of infinite possibilities and the focus on a grounded reality is what makes the never conclusion valid.
If you want this "too realistic" thing to be believable then you to need to get off the idea of "time makes anything possible" mentality that ignores omni-present industry factors (such as finances, human error and cultural values) and instead describe exactly what factors are needed for this to happen and the likelihood of it happening in the next 50 years. Taking refuge in the infinite possibilities of future is not going to somehow make "too realistic" games believable when there currently is and always has been an incentive to not make games anywhere near realistic; either from today with its complete inability to understand history or respect history or back then where people just wanted graphics but not realism since it would affect the gameplay.
Not to mention the human factors of different subjective views on physics, realism and the fact that someone would have to work very very hard to make a game like this.
The problem with this line of thinking is that are basically trying to compute infinity. At which then there is no point questioning what might happen because we are working with a mystery box of infinite possibilities. I'm just pointing out that realistically speaking we are never going to achieve ideals such as too realistic or proper immersion that doesn't rely on innate human belief to accept a hypothetical situation as real. There will always be something else that the industry would rather focus on because its both easier and more rewarding to do that then it is to make the "ultimate" product.
We are a point in time where culture is so fucked that it cannot possibly imagine ancient history without shoving minorities into it. That our most advanced societies are either police states (or rapidly becoming) or have cultures convinced that people who were never important in the country built the country. In 50 years its would be very unlikely for this mindset to have gone away and its effects on making immersive settings is going to last potentially forever. We won't have realistic settings if we still allow without question extreme mythologies like WW2 being fought between prosthetic british ladies and black female nazis. The human brain will detect these incredibly obvious failures and no amount of gaslighting or highly realistic graphics is going to fix that. Technology cannot make up for the lack of enthusiasm, creativity or respect for the craft that the industry will always experience.
Does it matter if Pierre Poilievre costs the conservative party the election? They still want to keep immigration the same way as all the other parties do. They still have the same economic policies as all the other parties do. They state they were against lockdowns and other curbing of freedoms that the liberal government did but they didn't do much or anything at all until after sentiment turned against lockdown policies. We are stuck in a deadlock between three parties all of which are fundamentally the same but offer different platitudes.
As for annexed Canada, no amount of economic policies is going to change the fact that Canada has had too many years of corruption and too few years growing any industry that might have made Canada a powerful country. We cannot fight and win against thousands of tanks with our 72. Or fight thousands of aircraft with our hundreds. Nor can we counter aircraft carriers, rocket artillery or even regular self-propelled artillery with our own because we don't have any.