5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Look at the second reason why you shouldn’t preorder

FTFY

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You attempted to defend "antisemitism". Which refers to race. It doesn't disappear when a Jew converts. But when defending it, you said that religious Jews are cursed until they convert. That's not antisemitism, that's just anti-Judaism.

So you contradicted yourself, but you're good at that. Quick, think of a distraction!

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

source? Fiddler on the Roof?

Source? What I already gave you, but you apparently didn't listen. There were strong anti-Jewish reactions everywhere precisely because Eastern Europeans Jews were so poor and uncultured.

Yes, Christianity was indeed a Jewish movement because God used the Jews. People have a problem admitting that here but it's fairly simple.

But that suggests that there is something fundamentally Jewish about Christianity. Also, this makes quite little sense. So communism and Christianity are both Jewish? They're polar opposites.

Lol to think that the influence of ethnoreligious culture ends when you stop believing in God is just so naive. Ashkenazis are atheist by default.

OK, so Marxism shows the influence of Jeiwshness because his father was a Jew who converted to Christianity, but by that standard, it's much less Jewish than Christianity.

I don't think you have your definitions or your thinking straight. What does it mean for an ideology or movement to "be Jewish"? Does it say something about the ideology or movement itself? If not, then isn't it tautological to say "communism is Jewish because [allegedly] most communists were Jews?"

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know, which is why I specifed that his is what they claim. The same people who say that piracy is theft will pull stunts like these.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

So basically, consequentialist or deontological?

I like to think of myself as the latter, but I probably have at least some aspects of the former. It's all fine and good to have great principles, but if the principles lead to bad results, you know, you shall know them by their fruits.

11
AntonioOfVenice 11 points ago +11 / -0

Jan 30

Why is this only coming out now? Or is it the usual Twitter users posting old news?

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another big tell for something like this is "British citizen".

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +9 / -0

If it is theft to download a movie you haven't paid for, as these goons claim, is it also not theft to take away a movie I have paid for?

Fortunately, I don't do the latter.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Simply, no.

No substantiation? You're becoming lazy even by your standards.

Yes, the apostles were Jews, but they were not evil. Why? Because they did not do evil. Obviously.

I guess Christianity was a 'Jewish movement' according to you then.

That makes utterly no sense.

It makes perfect sense. I'm sure you'll cry about Redditors again, but this is the fallacy of composition. There is nothing Jewish about communism, in fact, it is very anti-religious.

14
AntonioOfVenice 14 points ago +14 / -0

Step 1: associate a criminal with Trump.
Step 2: suggest that the prosecution was retaliation.

I don't care about his criticisms of Trump, but I wish for this warmonger to go to prison as David Petraeus should have.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

If people were being attacked for being from the city of Rome, would people try to blame that on claims that the Romans killed Jesus Christ?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Antisemitism refers to an ethnicity/race. So the Apostle Paul was cursed?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it? An overachieving minority population had already existed in Russia in the Germans, but they were never pogromed. What gives?

Were Jews even overachievers? Weren't they just very poor peasants? There's a reason everywhere Jews fled the pogroms to, they created an anti-Jewish backlash.

The Jewish guy Karl Marx? Yeah that guy.

Why are they only Jews when it suits you? By your standards, the Apostles were all Jews (and evil).

Either we do the reddit source? source?? thing or we go from the premise.

Hahaha. You're actually posting unsubstantiated claims, which you believe but have no idea why you believe them, and have the temerity to attack other people for asking you to back it up.

NO, I don't present evidence for my claims! We work from my unsubstantiated claims OR you're a Redditor.

No wonder the right is such a total, complete and total mess.

I find it ludicrous that even if you accepted that most Communist intellectuals were Jewish, that wouldn't prove Communism is a Jewish movement. I don't even know how that makes sense.

I find your position ludicrous, because there would still be nothing inherently 'Jewish' about Communism.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again this is super basic. Pick up your pumpkin latte at the counter

Indeed very basic.

Is it any surprise that people who believe in their own supremacy and form ethnic mercantile cliques become extremely disliked?

That wasn't the reason for the pogroms, was it?

Should we start with Jewish Karl Marx?

Whose father converted to Judaism, who wrote a pretty harsh essay on the "Jewish question"? That guy?

Communism is an intellectual movement and most of the intellects (as with half or more of the party membership) were Jewish.

You just keep repeating stuff without presenting evidence or making a case for how your claims would even make a difference. This is really basic stuff, man.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

So why are they, according to you, in control of everything and dominating you Aryan pure supermen in every way?

21
AntonioOfVenice 21 points ago +21 / -0

"People" who do this aren't human

But he will also tell you that the Nazis were bad because they considered Jews less than human.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is such a low information voter take. You could literally say this about anyone

And people would have an answer for it if you said it about "anyone". I assume you think it's very "high-information" to believe that a literal rando is pulling the strings because she spouted stupid and evil crap on TV once?

Oh yeah here we go again, those poor Jewish intellectuals always having to destroy the world's culture because they were so downtrodden

Explaining is not justifying. Is it any surprise that people who are the victims of pogroms would support movements that are AgainstThat?

And you completely elided basically a century of communism by starting in 1919, and didn't explain how Jewish overrepresentation would mean that "Communism is Jewish".

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't entirely sure whether you had called the Iraq War that or this new Iran War. I'm glad to see that even rabid neocons are running away from this Iran War like the rats that they are.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You think a whackjob woman is extremely influential? It makes little sense.

And the argument about communism wouldn't follow even if your claim about 50% were correct. How would Jewish overrepresentation (no doubt correct, probably due to the pogroms, but 50% seems fishy) in the Bolshevik Party make Communism itself somehow "Jewish"? And it's not as if communism started in 1919.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I agree the 'democracies' are definitely fake. But it would also be ridiculous to think that NGOs are the power behind the throne.

On the face of it, it's pretty absurd. Because you know as well as I do that the first group for whom Europe will become unlivable is Jews. So it has to rely on some pretty crazy theories about "Jews wanting to destroy Europe for some reason".

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Barbara Spectre is a literal nobody. The Rothschilds? I don't know if they're involved. Communism isn't Jewish, come on.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disasters???? That's not what you said a while back.

The Iraq War? The first was a success until the UN took a total win and traded it for a "draw". The second was a huge success, one for the history books. Until Obama took a war that was 99% won... and lost!

And valid plan? They didn't even have a plan for the Strait of Hormuz, although this probably won't stop you from saying that it was an AMAZING SUCCESS.

view more: Next ›