11
anonymous570861 11 points ago +11 / -0

Even if Prince Harry has got a hard-on for some slightly brown skin, there are a million women who look like Meghan Markle who aren't hollywoke retards who demand he humiliate himself, his family and his people.

A million women who look like her who are also in their late teens to early 20s. Prince Harry had his first child with Meghan Markle when Markle was 38. I really hope those kids aren't mentally slow or mentally unstable.

24
anonymous570861 24 points ago +24 / -0

Prince Harry is a prime example of someone with White guilt going to extreme ends to amend for their past "transgressions" against Non-Whites. Dude had a Nazi outfit for some costume party (that might been on Halloween? I forget) just to be an edgy boy and now he has turned into a total simp for a mid 30s (when they first met) aged mulatto Wokeshevik bitch.

Even if she wasn't a bitch or a Wokeshevik, even if you're one of those people that find her extremely attractive, a wealthy man like Prince Harry who is also LITERALLY ROYALTY could do so much better. It takes alot of White guilt for a man to lower himself like that.

23
anonymous570861 23 points ago +26 / -3

National Socialism is the only form of socialism that has ever actually worked in history and Socialist Lefties hate it.

To be, clear, I still prefer what most people would call "Capitalism", though that is a bullshit word that Marx made up.

18
anonymous570861 18 points ago +18 / -0

You're both equally ridiculous

I have way more evidence to back up my theory than Imp does his. That said, I understand that is not something easy to see for most people and I try not to press the issue on most people. But with Imp, he is essentially like people who think Jews run everything & have a plan for White Genocide, except he thinks women run everything & have a plan for Male Genocide.

Imp already has alot of the same puzzle pieces as I do, so I try to press the issue with him in a way that I wouldn't with other people. Unless someone like you specifically asked me to try to convert them, I am not trying.

33
anonymous570861 33 points ago +36 / -3

ConPro : "Stop noticing that!"

Now if you could just notice the religious & ethnic background of the wealthy elite people enabling most women to rule over most men.

1
anonymous570861 1 point ago +2 / -1

Both of these comments glow.

A glowie would want you to be caught doing Minecraft activities, and be specifically indentified as "rightwing" or one of their various scapegoats like MRAs, Incels, PUAs, Red Pillers, White indentarians, Christian indentarians, etc.

You and I both know that the Wokeshevik media & their Wokeshevik followers will harp on the same few incidents to make Whites, Men, Christians and Rightwingers look bad.

Rightwingers & non-Woke in general don't have enough people doing Minecraft activities to win the culture war with Minecraft activities alone. As such, Minecraft activities tend to do more harm than good, since the hard power of Minecraft is outnumbered by the soft power of Woke Media propaganda. So I advice those considering Minecraft activity to not be caught, but also to think of the optics for their political side if they get caught.

Also my message is for those already considering Minecraft activities, not those who have no interest in such a thing. Like I said, I am NOT asking anyone to risk their life and/or livelihood.

1
anonymous570861 1 point ago +2 / -1

Committing redacted is precisely what most westerners should be doing.

This looks like a good time for me to bring out my Minecraft players guide.

I'm not going to tell anyone to risk their life and/or livelihood to do something "in Minecraft". That is a personal choice you have to make for yourself. But if you decide to do anything in Minecraft, you must also do it "in Black Ops" so to speak.

Civil disobedience is a form of criminal activism, but only the left is allowed to do it. So if you choose to engage in rightwing civil disobedience in Minecraft, you better think less like an activist and more like a criminal. Activists want glory, criminals don't want to be caught.

Obviously the bigger the target, the more unwanted attention you will get from Minecraft police, so targets big or small, choose what you personally think you can handle. Targeting Minecraft property is usually more effective than targeting Minecraft people, it is generally easier to get away with.

Regardless do what you can to not be caught. Don't go bragging. Don't have a manifesto. Also try not to make your side look bad, dress like a lefty if you engage in Minecraft activity. If you get caught, spout lefty platitudes.

4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +7 / -3

I think it's just women trying to normalize it.

(((Women.)))

by folx
5
anonymous570861 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Asexual" and "Aromantic" is elite brainwashing, mainly targeted toward girls & young women. An elite scheme taking advantage of the low female libido to convince girls & women that they must not have a sex drive or romanatic feelings at all. Elites make it look trendy because girls & women eat that shit up. This is just another way for elites to prevent Whites from breeding.

The LGBT alaphabet sickness is most pushed on Whites, with Non-Whites (like half-Asian Jaiden here) being collateral damage. Young confused White kids see LGBT pride as a way to feel special because their racial pride & racial indentity has been supressed by elites.

by folx
6
anonymous570861 6 points ago +6 / -0

In the real version of The Emperor's New Clothes, Netflix makes shows where only stupid hicks can't see his clothes; the New York Times calls everyone who can't see it Nazis; studies are generated that show a correlation between brain damage and not seeing the clothes; social media posts pointing out the lack of clothes get tagged with fact checks about how the clothes really exist, if not automatically deleted for hate speech

This has basically played out with

GamerGate

9/11

Covid

Covid's Origins

The 2020 US Presidential Election

The January 6th Capital Protest

And more.

Daring to question the media narrative gets you labeled terms such as a Sexist, Racist, Anti-Semite, Nazi, Terrorist Sympathizer, Terrorist, etc. The Media wants to decide the real events, including your real motivations & mind state.

5
anonymous570861 5 points ago +5 / -0

AA isn't actually capable of pulling off framing himself as a centrist.

Who is AA?

4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not like she won't caucus with Democrats most of the time anyway.

All the time. She might vote with Democrats most of the time, but she will caucus with Democrats all the time. Caucusing is about which party is in charge.

4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +5 / -1

Kanye West is my first choice but I am under no illusion that he can actually win a primary or general election. He is a protest vote for me and I dont' give a shit if the "lesser evil" doesn't win. Republican populists have to know that being better than Democrats & NeoCons isn't enough. They don't have to go full Adolf, they just need to know that America First means America First and not Israel First or Jews First.

And I will absolutely campaign for Ye like he could win, the more votes for a Jew namer, the better. It sends a message.

15
anonymous570861 15 points ago +15 / -0

Just really tired of super hero deconstruction.

The best one ever done was the comedy movie Mystery Men in 1999

5
anonymous570861 5 points ago +6 / -1

This Balenciaga one is also good.

Look at that nose. BASED!

24
anonymous570861 24 points ago +24 / -0

Alex Jones did say Sandy Hook was a hoax.

Very naive of him to think that the government would fake a mass shooting instead of killing innocent people.

5
anonymous570861 5 points ago +7 / -2

Donald Trump hints that Kanye West ambushed him into a meeting with Nick Fuentes.

Thank you Kayne, very cool!

6
anonymous570861 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to be a Democrat, and would frequent Daily Kos. I seen the Wokeshevik takeover of the left in real time on that site among others.

9
anonymous570861 9 points ago +9 / -0

in a more feminine way.

You didn't have to cross that out, Joe Biden loves appointing unqualified Femshevik women to positions of importance,

see Kamala Harris & Ketanji Brown Jackson.

1
anonymous570861 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women having to compete with widespread pornography

Women have never had to compete with porn. Masterbation has never been competition to sex.

Men want to fuck hot women.

Men want to fuck women who are pretty enough, and men have higher sex drives than women. This is why even complete pigs of women get more attention on dating websites than average looking men.

Women want to fuck handsome, high status, high income men.

Women want to be wow'd more than they want to be fucked. Women have low sex drives. Money is one way of wow-ing women, and just as man's ideal woman is hot but he will settle for pretty enough, women tend to settle for guys with steady income that will spend money on them. Another way of wow-ing is having a good talk game, I have seen some ugly dudes pull women because their talk game was amazing, they didn't have alot money either (they also weren't tall, which women do like) and again, women will settle for a guy that just talks good enough.

Anyways, this is less about changing women's overall sexual habbits and more about changing women's overall relationship habbits. I would agrue it changes both but the former will be less than the latter, which will be most noticable.

You also ignored the previous commenter's point about artificial wombs removing the biological clock issue for women. That is one of men's biggest edges in finding wives.

If this gives men an edge, that edge is pretty dull but that is neither here or there.

Anyways women already have access to surrogates now but those surrogates are of course other women. So artificial wombs will give men some control in this area.

1
anonymous570861 1 point ago +2 / -1

Even if the technology works perfectly (which it won't)

That is a fair criticism, and we will have to see what happens when artificial wombs hit the market. It will likely only be the rich to have this tech at first, so the people selling this tech will want the tech to be adequate enough for buyers to pay top dollar. And there should be improvements in the tech by the time the tech is affordable for the general public.

even if it isn't used for all sorts of crazy eugenics nonsense (which it will be)

Eugenics is good.

how will destroying families all together help improve family structures?

No one said anything about destorying families. While I don't think it should be common for single guys to start families by themselves, the mere option being there will improve the sexual & romantic market place significantly in men's favor. When you take away women's natural advantages, they have to offer more in relationship, men can afford to be more picky.

Artificial wombs is only one part. The other part will be artificial eggs and realistic sex robots. When single men have options other than women for having children and even the act of sex itself, women will have to step up their game in a relationship to compete. This is basic sexual economics.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›