Your own source admits that Wakefield hasn't denounced his work, so no, he hasn't 'admitted that he made it all up'.
I then pointed out that he was involved in two documentaries that present striking, if somewhat biased, anecdotal evidence. You can draw your own conclusions if you deign to watch them.
I fail to see how (a)being right and (b) being reasonable makes me a moron.
'The guy who did the study' is, presumably, Andrew Wakefield, and he didn't 'make it all up'. He suggested in a research paper that some research be done investigating the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
He then went on to produce two documentaries (Vaxxed I&II, available on Bitchute) that will probably confirm your suspicion that vaccines can cause autism. The data is anecdotal -- because scientists refuse to do official studies -- but it's much more convincing that you think. I'm talking perfectly healthy children getting the shots and within 24 hours they end up with dead eyes, and are non-functional for the rest of their lives.
"laurithorne's" suggestion is typical of someone that hasn't looked into the issue. Yes, diagnosis of autism has exploded, so some of the correlation with vaccines is expected and harmless, but the extremely violent reactions are... stunning.
Jews aren't intelligent, or at least neither any more or less so than (white) gentiles. They're simply manipulative.
There's a reason that if your buddy does something clever you'll say ''Look at this Einstein!''... instead of Cavendish, Gauss, Watt or any number of actually intelligent people. And the reason isn't because Einstein was smart.
Okay, yeah, I 100% agree with you. I really (really) liked looking at the slim, attractive oriental chicks. The only problem is that chicks can't have organic conversations about... anything, so their, um, profundity bogs things down. Unfortunately, the next generation is going to think that it's real. At this point: maybe there's no fighting it?
Nah, it starts just great. One of the best things I've ever seen. And then... chicks everywhere. It's not bad, and they even diss the eminently dissable Madame Curie, but... it's not bad... but it is as bad as I say.
I'll have to look that up. I always thought that literature was one of the places where chicks do a pretty good job. The only major chick that wrote under a male synonym that I can think of is George Elliot -- and that was only because her writing was explicitly feminist, and she thought that men wouldn't stand for such whining from a chick.
I know you have some 'hot takes', but is this really just it? I mean: women can just look around and realize that 'male privilege' doesn't exist. When I was a kid I played basketball for fun, and there was no 'tall privilege' -- they were just better (except as point-guards).
You're usually more right than you're wrong.
... that's because SE Asian women worship white men as gods that stride the earth. A 40-yr old kissless virgin will drown in pussy over here. A guy with even a hint of game is like a super-model.