References to physical appearance have been heavily edited. The word “fat” has been removed from every book - Augustus Gloop in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory may still look like a ball of dough, but can now only be described as “enormous”.
In the same story, the Oompa-Loompas are no longer “tiny”, “titchy” or “no higher than my knee” but merely small. And where once they were “small men”, they are now “small people”.
Passages not written by Dahl have also been added. In The Witches, a paragraph explaining that witches are bald beneath their wigs ends with the new line: “There are plenty of other reasons why women might wear wigs and there is certainly nothing wrong with that.”
In previous editions of James and the Giant Peach, the Centipede sings: “Aunt Sponge was terrifically fat/And tremendously flabby at that,” and, “Aunt Spiker was thin as a wire/And dry as a bone, only drier.”
Both verses have been removed, and in their place are the underwhelming rhymes: “Aunt Sponge was a nasty old brute/And deserved to be squashed by the fruit,” and, “Aunt Spiker was much of the same/And deserves half of the blame.”
Fantastic Mr Fox’s three sons have become daughters.
Matilda reads Jane Austen rather than Rudyard Kipling, and a witch posing as “a cashier in a supermarket” now works as “a top scientist”.
One of Dahl’s most popular lines from The Twits is: “You can have a wonky nose and a crooked mouth and a double chin and stick-out teeth, but if you have good thoughts they will shine out of your face like sunbeams.” It has been edited to take out the “double chin”.
So they even removed the pro-fat line...seems fatphobic
A mention in Esio Trot of tortoises being “backward” - the joke behind the book’s title - has been excised.
The words “black” and “white” have been removed: characters no longer turn “white with fear” and the Big Friendly Giant in The BFG cannot wear a black cloak.
The changes were made by the publisher, Puffin, and the Roald Dahl Story Company, now owned by Netflix, with sensitivity readers hired to scrutinise the text.
If I recall correctly (and it's literally been many decades), only (the first?) part of The Jungle Book is about Mowgli and his bullshit. The rest of it is basically animal fables, which girls like, too.
Fuck Jane Austen and whatever boring crap she wrote.
Oh, that’s… That’s not why they’re cancelling Kipling, my dude…
The guy was much more than The Jungle Book…
Though how much of that was featured in Matilda, vis a vis simply replacing one “conservative male author” with a “progressive (for her time) feminist author”, I do not know…
Kipling was like… The antithesis of modern “wokie” literature… Hence his erasure, lol…
I've read Jane Austen's oeuvre pretty much entirely. I would be seriously hesitant to describe her as a progressive. She does a pretty good job of refraining from making any actual opinion and mostly just pokes fun at the sensibilities of the upper-class of late 1700's England. Each book ends in a wedding, happily ever after style, and it's pretty clear that the ideas of the upper-class are justified once more after she's teased them a little. It's pure literary comedy in the classical sense.
Fair enough. I more meant that she was a woman, not writing under a pseudonym, in that time period…
Her actual work may not be all that “progressive” by today’s standards, but she was still a massive outlier for the time…
Like Mary Shelley, or the Bronte sisters, et al…
That’s why liberals today (or whatever we want to call the ones doing the censoring) look up to her so much, rather than anything to do with a) her own written words, or b) whatever her actual beliefs and views on things may have been…
So they even removed the pro-fat line...seems fatphobic
now owned by Netflix
now owned by Netflix
now owned by Netflix
If I recall correctly (and it's literally been many decades), only (the first?) part of The Jungle Book is about Mowgli and his bullshit. The rest of it is basically animal fables, which girls like, too.
Fuck Jane Austen and whatever boring crap she wrote.
Oh, that’s… That’s not why they’re cancelling Kipling, my dude…
The guy was much more than The Jungle Book…
Though how much of that was featured in Matilda, vis a vis simply replacing one “conservative male author” with a “progressive (for her time) feminist author”, I do not know…
Kipling was like… The antithesis of modern “wokie” literature… Hence his erasure, lol…
I've read Jane Austen's oeuvre pretty much entirely. I would be seriously hesitant to describe her as a progressive. She does a pretty good job of refraining from making any actual opinion and mostly just pokes fun at the sensibilities of the upper-class of late 1700's England. Each book ends in a wedding, happily ever after style, and it's pretty clear that the ideas of the upper-class are justified once more after she's teased them a little. It's pure literary comedy in the classical sense.
Fair enough. I more meant that she was a woman, not writing under a pseudonym, in that time period…
Her actual work may not be all that “progressive” by today’s standards, but she was still a massive outlier for the time…
Like Mary Shelley, or the Bronte sisters, et al…
That’s why liberals today (or whatever we want to call the ones doing the censoring) look up to her so much, rather than anything to do with a) her own written words, or b) whatever her actual beliefs and views on things may have been…