I don’t know if that’s the excuse but I know there will be an excuse, excuses are all feminists have.
I swear, there is a particular strain of faggotry found in modern leftists, especially the young ones, where their brains simply cannot parse the distinction between fiction and reality. Or like, they can’t engage with the two differently, which is incredibly unhealthy.
Sometimes, there’s only one word for someone/something. You’ve nailed it here with “turbofaggot.” I’ve seen enough of this turbofaggot’s work that if I read something and agreed with him I’d question my own judgment on whatever the issue was.
The perfect satirist doesn’t exist. Every satirist, no matter how committed to the joke, will always break down eventually if placed under enough pressure from the people whose agendas and beliefs the satirist is attacking. It’s inevitable.
(Reads OP)
…okay, there is one perfect satirist.
🎶 I cut down trees, 🎵 my coffee shop fails
That’s what stood out to me! I suppose to add to it, it’s a little rich referring to a “quiet” season for your business that only lasted a year and so only experienced each season once. Sounds like what really happened is his business was just quiet, full stop - probably because his business model was retarded.
The phrase I generally hear is “it’s never enough.” That is, it doesn’t matter how much you bend the knee, these SJW retards will come up with a reason to keep holding you accountable for what they claim are your sins, keep finding a way to make a country with a super leftist coward-government that can’t wait to give people like him everything they want a “colonialist death camp.”
So she’s as gay as Dumbledore! Anyone remember that one tranny’s whacked-out list of 100 writing rules from a few years back, that went viral as it got made fun of from every corner of the Internet? I remember out of all 100 rules the one single one that made me nod in agreement was saying, do characterization in the work itself, not on Twitter afterwards.
If they could just make a simple argument about “here’s why there was educational or social value in showing this movie,” people could engage with it and debate if necessary. But leftists always take things three steps further than necessary, probably because their main positions are indefensible in a liberal (old definition) society. “I don’t have to make an argument for why I showed the movie because YOU HAVE NO FUCKING RIGHTS YOUR KIDS ARE MINE, ALL MINE HAHAHAHA!!!” And they say everyone else uses systems and structures to s few with THEM..,
Yeah I think I give some credit to the OP’s explanation of this being “a Rorschach” — people with agendas are going to see the meaning or solution they want to see. I’ve noticed lately the trans activists are trying out words like “disfiguring” in their discourse, trying to seed the conversation with the idea that going through natural puberty despite the Internet convincing you you’re the other gender is akin to being maimed, and it’s blatant what they’re doing, it’s all setting up the argument that waiting until 18 to transition is akin to cutting off someone’s limbs in terms of how “bad” it is so we NEED to start kids early. You’re right, man, the agenda-mongers will see this and say it proves we need to trans more kids. God damnit!
I went to law school in my late 30s, surrounded by Zoomers. I’m not sure “mature and thought provoking” can realistically describe Zoomers or any of the things they actually consume or interact with regularly. They are, by and large, not a serious cohort.
“He’s Muslim?!? Oh shit, that’s high enough in the stack that I’m okay with him human trafficking. …wait, the victims WERE white though, right?”
My pet peeve with satire or attempts at it is something I’ll call the giveaway stinger line, bolded here: “lol women are so dumb. btw how come I have trouble getting dates.” It’s just so lazy. That one comic about the peasant who says “we should improve society somewhat” has the shit eating bad guy give his spiel and then he says “I am very smart” as a giveaway stinger line.
Like, just learn to do some fucking satire. Trust your audience that they can figure out who is meant to be the target of your joke.
Anyway, women on TikTok are retarded.
I notice they always use a term like “holla at” for the same behavior described by “cat-call” when it’s done by a favored demographic. I suppose it’s only “cat-calling” when it’s in one direction on the progressive stack.
Wrapped up in every single thing of this general nature, to also include #MeToo and #YesAllWomen, ostentatiously whining about walking alone at night, and everything else you can think of, is a woman trying to smuggle the following proposition into your attention without saying it outright:
“I am attractive enough that men want me.” (Edit: and maybe even more specifically, “I am attractive enough to where the number of men who want me is higher than the number of men I would take.” Hence the certainty that she will be assaulted!)
That’s it, that’s all. “I’m doing this so I don’t get assaulted” implies someone has assaulted her, or that she thinks it likely someone will, and that all derives backward to what women naturally want: to be seen as attractive. There are giveaways in other parts of female rhetoric: note how Lizzo doesn’t say “I’m obese as hell and fuck you if you don’t like it” (which I would respect, honestly) but instead she says “I’m obese and I’m the new beauty standard!” Thats all modern day feminism is, and why it’s so youth-oriented and wrapped up in dating strategy and the language of dating. Women want to feel pretty, but some of them can’t admit that and have to sneak the idea through while wrapped up in empowerment and fierceness and YAS KWEEN rhetoric. I for one am not fooled.
Relatedly, looking at the picture, is this teacher a she/her or a “she/her”? I legit can’t tell anymore.
Ah, she even uses the “I didn’t feel safe” line. That’s like the Masonic “sign of great distress” or whatever it’s called. If you say you don’t feel “safe” all the other landwhales and limp-wrists will come to your defense.
To paraphrase the black Cleopatra actress, “Men did it first, but women could have five it first absolutely.”
It’ll be fine, they’ll just cast Lizzo as Willie Wonka and then no one will even notice how fucked up the story kinda is. Just don’t use real chocolate and candy in the sets or the movie might never finish production.
They have started putting these types of mutants in Lego sets, as well as amputees and other monstrosities.
And see as a 80s/90s kids we “diversified” our Lego guys and other action figures by making them amputees the old fashioned way…
Honestly, next time you’re watching TV, pay attention to the kids in commercials. It must be some kind of trend to cast only the weirdest looking children in anything, even ads, and preferably ones where the combination of their weird looks and stylistic choices like clothes and hair makes them look completely genderless.
It’s just the going thing right now. It’s not as blatant as the apparent requirement that every female adult role be filled by a shambling fatass with a bizarre skin condition, but the goofy androgynous kid casting is quietly on the rise. Ones that stand out in my mind are the “what’s a computer?” girl and the kid from a recent commercial where a dad turns a shed into a giant version of the kid’s favorite snow globe. I don’t even remember what the ad was selling, but then I also could never figure out if the kid was a boy or girl.
Of course the real fun will begin when they do the next round of remakes. They won’t be able to do a “race-blind” casting of Ariel or Charlie or Tinkerbell, because think how enraged all the “their race doesn’t matter” leftists will be if a (now) black character is cast as white (or anything besides black really). If you want to know, look up their frothing rage over the announcement that some of the Lilo n Stitch live remake actors aren’t as tan as they think they should be.
Always some goddamn index or scorecard or what the fuck ever. People should have the guts to tell them to shove the numbers up their commie asses.
Where would a title be other than the greeting of the cover letter? If someone called me up all angry about “misgendering” them there, my first reaction would be shock that they read any part of a cover letter.
Haha, the weapon kit. They’ve spent years seeding people’s minds with the idea that there is a trans genocide and that any perceived inconvenience they encounter is part of that genocide… and then they arm the alleged targets of the nonexistent genocide. I wonder what they’re hoping will happen?!?!
And I can’t wait until they suddenly know nothing about it when some troon kills someone for a perceived bad look in their direction or something. A bunch of mentally ill people with weapons, what could go wrong.