Actions speak louder than words. But words spouted through literal and figurative megaphones can still be heard for miles – especially in a polarized political climate.
Take GOP Sen. John Kennedy's comments about Mexico at a recent hearing.
"Without the people of America, Mexico, figuratively speaking, would be eating cat food out of a can and living in a tent behind an Outback," the Louisiana congressman said. He was questioning Drug Enforcement Administration Administrator Anne Milgram and inquired about fentanyl moving from Mexico to the U.S. while also comparing the countries' economies.
You’re not allowed to identify failure in non-white, non-male, non-Christian, or non-LGBT populations. Blacks could become 100% of murderers, gays could become 100% of STD carriers, women could become 100% of in-debt college students and failed CEOs, Muslims could become 100% of religious terrorists, and you would still be required to pretend that there is no correlation between protected demographics and shitty behavior.
David Oliver is an entertainment, lifestyle and wellness reporter at USA TODAY covering diversity and inclusion. He has a master's degree in nonfiction writing from Johns Hopkins University and a bachelor's degree in journalism from the University of Maryland.
Sometimes, there’s only one word for someone/something. You’ve nailed it here with “turbofaggot.” I’ve seen enough of this turbofaggot’s work that if I read something and agreed with him I’d question my own judgment on whatever the issue was.
It's not vulgar nor racist, but it is in bad taste to try to take credit for everything good in another country. Needlessly denigrating other people is not 'based'.
Yes, they send it to their families, not to 'the country'. Nor would Mexico be eating catfood. Stuff the arrogance, little boy. Your Drag Queen Empire ain't all that great.
Yes, they send it to their families, not to 'the country'.
No sweetie they send it to their families to spend on their country. Figure out basic economics please….
Nor would Mexico be eating catfood.
Again a lie, Mexico gets more income exporting food which is subsidized by America if they lost the income from remittances they would easily be eating shit
Clearly you've never been there. Their entire pathetic excuse for a satrapy would be on fire within a week if they were ever actually forced to fend for themselves.
Every time they bring out “dehumanizing” remind them that if gender is a social construct, then so is humanity
That’s racist and vulgar?
You’re not allowed to identify failure in non-white, non-male, non-Christian, or non-LGBT populations. Blacks could become 100% of murderers, gays could become 100% of STD carriers, women could become 100% of in-debt college students and failed CEOs, Muslims could become 100% of religious terrorists, and you would still be required to pretend that there is no correlation between protected demographics and shitty behavior.
Someone needs to research the correlation between Outback and economic downturn.
Seriously, check out this turbofaggot's article history. https://archive.is/ingrQ
He literally shit out two articles with nearly identical titles back to back once, both of them unbelievably gay:
Why would anyone ever even pretend to take anything this soylord writes seriously? I'm stunned people don't literally piss on him when they meet him.
https://archive.is/gnzuh
There is a pattern for those of you who care to notice. Also daily reminder that physiognomy is real.
Gee, maybe we should round them up, put them in camps and gas them.
Stop with this shit, really.
We can't arrive at more merciful solutions if we refuse to acknowledge the problem.
Considering the high correlation between turbofaggotry and degenerative hedonism, he probably loves being pissed on.
Sometimes, there’s only one word for someone/something. You’ve nailed it here with “turbofaggot.” I’ve seen enough of this turbofaggot’s work that if I read something and agreed with him I’d question my own judgment on whatever the issue was.
Mexico takes like 1/3 of our GDP between the remittances and the drugs, but the bad guy is the one with mean words.
fucking CRY ABOUT IT
Vulgar yes, racist no. Can you criticize a country only if it is white?
Where’s the vulgarity?
...But is it false?
These leftist cunts will push "hate speech" until everyone is on board and the First Amendment means nothing.
It's not vulgar nor racist, but it is in bad taste to try to take credit for everything good in another country. Needlessly denigrating other people is not 'based'.
Mexicos main source of income is remissions from the US and has been for decades
It'd do just fine without remissions from the US.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 which is why the 15 million Mexicans in America illegally don’t send money home. Make a better argument princess
I think 15 million is probably a conservative estimate at this point.
I was speaking purely about Mexicans, the overall is close to double that
Yes, they send it to their families, not to 'the country'. Nor would Mexico be eating catfood. Stuff the arrogance, little boy. Your Drag Queen Empire ain't all that great.
No sweetie they send it to their families to spend on their country. Figure out basic economics please….
Again a lie, Mexico gets more income exporting food which is subsidized by America if they lost the income from remittances they would easily be eating shit
Clearly you've never been there. Their entire pathetic excuse for a satrapy would be on fire within a week if they were ever actually forced to fend for themselves.