Do you understand the difference between not allowing pre-launch reviews for a game that can be pre-ordered and one that is FTP?
Second paragraph. Fucking lol. Unironically yes they do. Ethics are like locks, for friends and neighbors.
"You're such a hypocrite. Youre only shooting people in the other army!"
Alt tab right click close?
Alternatively, I'm not sure I can conceptualize the legal state of declining to fulfill a requirement for entry, and then... being faced with the consequence of... not being allowed entry somehow being the fault of the person setting the requirements.
What's the tort violation otherwise?
It's not a contract you monkey.
Dota has been getting updates, substantial massive tons of content updates for 20 years, and its still around 65 G. I trust this one
Holy shit.
Overwatch is my favorite bad game, and I played it up until the Hong Kong bullshit and haven't participated with anything blizzard since so I'm excited as well, especially since the Toad's philosophy is anti everything I disliked about overwatch
I mean you're clearly not familiar with the guy who has been in continuous development on the same game for nearly 20 years.
But sure I guess.
Wat. We're talking about the dota 2 developer. Like you're realize that. He's the ultimate "built it in a cave, with a bunch of scraps."
This is exactly how dota 2 was relased, beta keys. So sure it's "silly" for the developer of the most successful esport of all time to develop a similar game using similar marketing for the same company.
And YES there is a secret sauce. Its nothing. The secret sauce is being secret and keeping retards out of your process flow. Which is helped by the dude being anonymous for so long, and not broadcasting his design choices.
I don't get how your brain works. But I've made that clear before
This brought me so much joy. But it's a great immediate lesson on what entitled children these retards are.
As I say, Journalists are the bottom of the piss barrel of professions (the list of piss professions is long and includes cops, nurses, actors, journalists, and some others) and you don't usually get to see it so clearly and easily laid out in real time.
I mean if you don't know anything about the guy developing it what you said might make sense.
But the Frog being involved is about the only trustworthy name in game development.
So Sauron is Lord Business
Same. I bought Xbox live for the first time when I was 16, and had an unbroken subscription from then until last year. Nearly 20 years. And I havent missed it for a second since I canceled it.
For about a year before that my Xbox was glorified Netflix box. And now it doesn't even get used for that anymore.
Wild how much goodwill and loyalty corporations have burned through recently
Genuinely I don't think her being a Jew is the insult.
But I do think the reason she so deeply and gleefully desired to deliver the insult is because she's a Jew.
Small distinction but important.
I've said I fall for propaganda and advertising like I drink. The sophisticated stuff doesn't work on me at all really.
But your cigar has a spiderweb based artwork on it or cool skull? I'm interested
I thought you were banned again
Sometimes it's just impotence and lack of creativity too.
I use the hitler example with Normies I'm trying to chip at. Was he more evil than the Toolbox Killers just because he had a higher bodycount? Most of the time I can get them to agree it's AT LEAST debateable
It goes both ways though your dad turning out positive could just be the coincidence.
My in laws being a great example, they'd tell you they were great Christian parents, and they are 2 for 8 in keeping their kids in the church, but 3 for 8 in producing pagans, and 2 for 8 for serial deviance.
Sometimes parents are garbage and produce positive offspring by accident.
This is the point where you loose the thread because the enlightenment isn't the cause of this at all, the enlightenment was the tiniest, merest blip of rationalism in the unending centuries of incantatism.
The moment was brief and glorious and of fucking course the people who crushed it had to steal its language and pretend to be carrying the torch of rationality.
The truth is the enlightenment died as swiftly as it came, and it's promise was forgotten until about 30 years ago, were again it lasted maybe a decade before being snuffed out with exteme prejudice.
Rationalism isnt an ideology, its a framework for decision making, and recognizing whether all people are or are not capable of it is fundamental to its nature. If the conclusion is that blacks as a class simply can't be taught, the enlightenment doesn't give them voting rights anyway because muh dignaty. Quite the contrary.
His version is a good example of when that phrase is true. I only just recently started the books, and the entire opening is a great example of it. There's dialogue that gets moved around, chronology that gets changed a bit and scenes added and subtracted but every one of them is aiming to communicate what took Tolkein 3 pages to exposit abstractly.
Now when people say "it has to be changed a little" they mean "we combined these two characters and deleted three plot lines so the whole no longer makes sense because hiring 2 actors is too expensive" (see Harry potter) or they mean some modern audiences bullshit
The entire point of the rights existence is to stop us all from regressing into constant warlord violence. That's the "Order" part. We find a way to coexist and a set of rules to manage our interactions with people we disagree with. Disagree with to the point of violence without those rules.
The result is Capital C Civilization. Structures that take humanity from mud into the stars.
That's the ideal. At its base level it's honorable, admirable, and wraps nihilists and christians in a wide warm embrace that improves the lives of everyone.
The glory of Civilization is delayed gratification writ large. The rule that says, if you don't steal Unga's Oranges makes him more willing to spend time growing oranges. And so you give up a free orange to have 20 cheap ones.
The cascade of that simple idea is everything fundamental to anything good humans have built.
The left has none of that. All their moralizing is referential. Its all concerning managing what IS and rejecting possibility.
So damn right were better than them
You've mischaracterized the second group.
The first group is easy because they don't think linearly from principle to derive moral rules like fully actualized humans. In this way they aren't really any different than most normies. What they believe is down to chance rather than anything else. But normies can't be considered to have a self so it's by the by.
For the second group, is far more akin to an alien race. What they believe is completely logical and consistent. They start from a different value set than most of humanity however and that leads to conclusions that seem ludicrous.
Your system of language and values DOESNT HAVE ready made definitions for what they are, which is why it's a struggle to map them appropriately in your picture of the world. Like trying to plot four dimensional objects on paper, it just doesn't fit.
No no you can't do that because racism.
The part I dont get it how you can be deep in the pit enough to end up here, but you still don't get it.
You're replying to the wrong guy mate.
I don't think he's reachable tho. Neocon piece of shit that he is.
Tribalism as a scare word is why we're in this mess.
Fuck off cunt.
There isn't one. The character design is solid having played it now.