7
SufferableKant 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can't tell if this surgeon has never seen a human male naked, or it they're just taking the piss and trolling their patients.

5
SufferableKant 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was going to spend the weekend binging on two-for-one Diarrhea Dragon takeaway, but this photo motivated me to go and hit the iron instead.

13
SufferableKant 13 points ago +13 / -0

I used to be a lot more sympathetic towards their argument for early term abortions.

But over the past two or three years my respect for this has soured after seeing how adamant they are in demanding the right to abortions up to the third trimester, and witnessing how they seem to be abusing abortions as means of contraception.

23
SufferableKant 23 points ago +23 / -0

The sad part is you cannot even discuss that like with them "What is moral about murdering babies?", because they are so far gone that they truly believe they're not babies until after birth.

12
SufferableKant 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Go woke, go broke" ceases to apply in cases where the goal is not in fact, to produce a profit from their product.

"Why wouldn't a company want to make a profit?" you ask.

If the goal is instead to spread propaganda, then any losses they incur are just operating expenses, and are easily subsidised by their ESG racket.

13
SufferableKant 13 points ago +13 / -0

I am amazed that they are still alive still drawing after all these years.

Even if the usual causes hadn't taken their toll, I'd have thought the relentless mockery from the people photoshopping their comics would have at least make them quit drawing.

3
SufferableKant 3 points ago +3 / -0

The vehicle despawning drove me nuts all the way back to the first one, haha.

You see a nice car you want to grab, it takes a turn behind a building, and when you catch up, it's disappeared into oblivion. Infuriating.

But yeah, GTA with a more realistic fully-simulated world would be pretty fucking amazing.

26
SufferableKant 26 points ago +26 / -0

This is sadly common across most of the creative spaces (music, visuals, writing), and also the subset of developers that gravitate towards gamedev (as opposed to generic office jobs).

Maybe it's just rose-tinted glasses, but how often in the past few years have you picked up a game and thought "Why does it still have this problem? The industry solved this YEARS ago!".

IMHO the bar is dropping, and the industry as an average is becoming less and less competent.

25
SufferableKant 25 points ago +25 / -0

GTA IV was decent, but it was let down by the constant nagging cellphone mechanic and the needy and obnoxious friendship/relationship mechanic constantly getting in the way of all the action and missions.

GTA V singleplayer was fun at launch IMHO. I enjoyed the campaign. But the way they've exploited and capitalised on the multiplayer version is just depressing.

Lastly, time to start a fight with an unpopular opinion: Vice City was the best 3D GTA, not San Andreas.

7
SufferableKant 7 points ago +8 / -1

It's significantly worse, IMHO.

Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.

OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.

6
SufferableKant 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not that far off TBH.

Earlier this year there was a news story about a university offering freshmen women bodies-with-front-holes classes on how to safely get into OnlyFans.

It's not that much of a stretch to see them putting together "entrepreneur" funds that will loan gift money to strong, brave, and independent young female entrepreneurs to assist in buying a nice 4K camera and some studio lights for their business endeavour. All written off as a corporate responsibility tax break.

I'm surprised the alphabet people haven't been more vocal in demanding fair representation in porn though. The existing audience won't want to watch it. So the obvious solution is that the government (i.e., the taxpayer) should subsidise the companies on the condition they hire them (i.e. pay them to hire ugly danger hairs).

Hell, there was drama the past week or two about a "Family Sex Show" in the UK, that was basically just child grooming in a "we are kind and caring leftists" disguise, and that was funded by the tax payer.

17
SufferableKant 17 points ago +17 / -0

Correct.

They can control what you spend your money on, who you purchase from, how often you're allowed to do so, and tweak rates and fees to encourage or discourage your spending habits.

You'll be forced to behave in a socially appropriate manner (according to their standards) if you want the privilege of continued access to your money.

I can see it now already: quotas and caps on what you're allowed to spend on based upon your "carbon footprint", which you can temporarily raise by climbing up a tier on your social credit score by using your social media accounts to "organically" parrot promote their ESG goals.

Want to eat meat this month? You better get started shilling for Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity, and hope that it's believable enough that sufficient people hit the Like button for you to rank up.

2
SufferableKant 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually wonder how many of the incels would make use of prostitutes or escorts if prostitution has legalized tomorrow.

It seems that a lot of them still have the mainstream shame and revulsion to having to explicitly pay up front for sex. They seem to still want that illusion that the woman enjoyed their dinner date and the trip to the theater and whatever; and that the reason she's having sex with him is because she likes his personality.

I reckon this contributes a lot to why they prefer OnlyFans instead of just random porn stars on PH or whatever. They don't want to watch even the exact same video of the exact same girl doing the exact same thing. They want to watch live and pretend they're the only one in the room, and they want to interact live because it makes them feel "involved" and like they're "contributing" in some way to her enjoyment performance.

Any sane person would point out you could take that same money and just visit a decent classy escort, but I guess there is some underlying need for plausible deniability or something.

27
SufferableKant 27 points ago +27 / -0

"Here's why Authoritarianism is actually a good thing, and 10 reasons why it will work perfectly this time as long as We are in charge!"

1
SufferableKant 1 point ago +1 / -0

One look at the title of the post and my first thought was "Wow, these people really hate gingers."

6
SufferableKant 6 points ago +6 / -0

I f***ing told you so

— Orwell, probably

11
SufferableKant 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're already acting like the only reason the human race is still alive is thanks to all their genius decisions over the past 2 years, and despite all the resistance from naysayers like us.

Next up they'll probably double down on their line that the world is about to end any second now from climate change, and that the only thing stopping this from happening is your ongoing obedience in following their every instruction down to the letter.

9
SufferableKant 9 points ago +9 / -0

They got to feel like heroes while sitting inside on their phones whole day doing nothing, and for throwing away other people's freedoms.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›