Remember, the computer has literally zero reference to reality. If you tell it enough times that 2+2=5, it's going to accept that as part of it's training. If that bad lesson is taught into the system, and you carry this AI around to solve problems, it's going to have not only logic errors, but a kind of unconscious logic error if it were a person.

Hold on, hold on. Not too long ago you were telling us all how AI was "based" because computers were some kind of logical oracle that "understand that the data can not be wrong", even defending your ludicrous comments when I pointed out that computers and AI just follow their programming and could easily be wrong when programmed badly (yes, data can be wrong, for example a datum stating that "2+2=5" is wrong, despite your bizarre insistence that data is some kind of magical substance of truth).

Now suddenly AI isn't "based" (in reality), but rather has "zero reference to reality" and is going to carry "bad lesson(s) taught into the system" and make "logic errors", exactly as I was pointing out.

You are so really good at writing long-winded comments that sound intelligent but actually you are just full of shit, much like ChatGPT.

And if he hadn't got sick and never showed weakness, she might have divorced him a few years later taking his children and resources. The harsh truth for men is the current laws mean they are entirely at the mercy of the women they are in relationships with, and it's just luck whether or not she decides to pull the trigger.

There may be graphene oxide in these injections, but I doubt it. I've seen the actual manufacturing protocol from various released documents, and although some details are still redacted, it's pretty clear there is no step that adds graphene oxide, so if this was to be present it would be unintentional contaminant or intentional addition outside the official protocol; in both cases the "official" documents aren't going to reveal much about this.

I'm just annoyed that people could be so stupid to mistake an electon microscopy sample preparation protocol for the manufacturing protocol for these injections. Even for someone who doesn't know about electron microscopy sample preparation, it's pretty obvious that the protocol in question doesn't refer to manufacture of the injections themselves. But one mention of the word "graphene oxide" and "OMG! I saw the word graphene oxide in a document released by Pfizer! This must mean it is really in the shots!" and we have bullshit headlines like "Pfizer Confirms Via FOIA Graphene Oxide in the Clot Shots".

Some researchers over-hyping their discoveries with fun-sounding acronyms and lots of language such as "could one day offer" is nothing new. Human hubris knows no limits, but where are our flying cars already?

Two papers you randomly plucked out of the literature regarding graphene oxide say nothing about whether it's a useful adjuvant in the real world. Most likely it's more researchers over-hyping their research using fancy terminology such as "nano-adjuvant", which is laughable since most functional structures within cells are proteins and protein complexes that are already in the scale of nanometers, but that's usually not what people mean when they are talking about "nano" this and that.

Oh! You found references to graphene oxide as a potential ingredient in vaccines in the scientific literature! Therefore, obviously all vaccines must have graphene oxide in them! What a stupid argument. It's a red herring.

The expression of the spike protein is toxic enough by itself (and maybe the LNPs themselves), without needing to invoke some other toxic components, yet alone the ludicrous graphene oxide "nanobot" hypothesis (as if humans have technology that advanced).

There's plenty of information in those documents that's not "innocuous", such as the damning information about the LNP distribution following injection in animal models, but this electron microscopy protocol is red herring. In my opinion, the whole graphene oxide "conspiracy" is a fake story spread to discredit those opposed to these injections.

This is absolute bullshit. The document in question refers to a protocol to perform electron microscopy on a sample of the purified spike protein (expressed according to the sequence in these injections). It is NOT the protocol to manufacture these injections. Seriously, people should learn how to read and interpret the information they are reading, rather than jumping to stupid conclusions because they are too dumb or lazy or understand what they are reading.

Related trivia: Easter and Passover actually overlap fairly often - they are both approximately the first full moon after the equinox, though details differ due to the actual calendars being used. Ramadan, on the other hand, becomes earlier each year as the Islamic calendar is purely lunar, and thus has "years" that are shorter than a solar year, so the dates cycle through a solar calendar over the years. The overlap with Easter will occur every X years based on the calendar length.

Sure but repenting means an honest and sincere attempt to stop sinning. Asking for forgiveness with faux repentance isn't going to fool God.

You are lacking meaning in your life. You've probably already figured that out, but it can't hurt someone else offering the same diagnosis.

You need to find meaning. It's there. I can't tell you want it will be, because it must come from within yourself. But I can tell you that it won't be in a romantic relationship or is unlikely to come from a job.

The good news is this has been a question for men throughout history, so there is much written but many men searching for the same thing. In religious texts, in philosophical texts, in our myths and legends. So the best I can suggest is to search for that meaning in the words of our fathers and their fathers. And in yourself.

You have a point but I think you're mistaken about who will be pushing for that particular use of a CBDC (punishing single men). The left wing will offer it to "traditionalists" as a way to "restore the family" or other such nonsense. The "traditionalists" will fall for it and then the left wing will do a bait and switch and then use the CBDC for whatever they want, including punishing the "traditionalists" if they don't conform.

(Scare quotes around "traditionalists" as I don't agree that they are actually support real traditional values, just bastardised versions based on feminist myths such as "patriarchy" and men being disposable as a natural rule)

That's about the lowest I've seen from you so far.

Given how OpenAI has kept GPT3 under tight control, I doubt the weights will ever be released officially, but other freely available models might come close eventually; I suppose the weights might end up being leaked. Resource-wise they are very heavy due to the number of parameters so running on consumer grade hardware will be tricky.

Sure you can run these on a CPU, they're just usually painfully slow.

It's easy to run the smaller models locally with a GPU, no one needs a stupid video to teach them when the info is easily found. Good luck running GPT3+ or even getting hold of the weights to deploy on a compute node.

Boys were being brainwashed for far longer than trans was much of a thing, and no one cared. It's why we're in such a mess - first thing when anyone points out gynocentrism is an issue, white knights like you come and pretend you're looking out for boys when really you're just trying to earn brownie points thinking it'll get you some pussy.

Of course. The trans issue affects women. A man losing his kids isn't important because it doesn't help women. And their wellbeing is less important than protecting whatever a woman (their mother) wants.

Not in the sense that they want wear a dress, get fake tits and become a sex freak, but in the sense that they want the freedom of choice that women have.

Plenty of MRAs simply want the rights that men were traditionally given, such as being considered fairly for jobs that they are capable of performing (instead of being discriminated against in favour of women with less ability) and being guaranteed rights to see and bring up their children (instead of being assumed by default to be unfit parents or worse). Yet, even so-called "traditionalists" do not support men having these rights if it would be a detriment to women.

There will, obviously, be no quotas for men despite them being a minority. The quotas being proposed for women will be lower limit to ensure a range of 51% to 100%.

Turtles all the way down.

She's not going to fuck you, bro.

It just goes to show that the problem of trans-women raping women in prison is vastly eclipsed by biological woman raping women in prison, yet almost everyone focuses on the former issue and doesn't care about the latter. This is mainly because they are sexist against men and in favour of women.

No, Windows 2000 was based on Windows NT. It has a completely different lineage to Windows 95/98. Windows 2000 became Windows XP, and the 95/98/Me side was abandoned.

When it's FtM it's a male. When it's MtF it's a male. When it's a male it's a male. When it's a female it was because of a male in some way. That's the point. Feminists and their allies will always claim the perpetrator is male or the fault lies with men.

Meh. You probably think those men discriminated against when being admitted to medical school are just "feeling sorry for themselves" and should shut up. Doubt you even see it as wrong.