I do believe Castro said he could overthrow the USA with 10,000 dedicated and trained revolutionaries. I do believe he was right and not exaggerating by much tbh.
Why do you think the dems spread around the myth that only a full military can defeat the US government.
In truth, a few different guerilla cells could cause such an impact within a month with the right targets that the urban areas would turn on themselves and rural areas would arm up to protect their hold on resources.
Buncha afghan cave dwellers defeated us.. but then again we gimped ourselves and showed restraint. The "win hearts strategy". The viets outlasted us too by hiding in the jungle and caves.
Vietnam was lost from the beginning not just because and troops assaulting the north might be met by Soviet response but you can also thank Woodrow Wilson for Ho Chi Minh.
The Afghanistan conflict was lost when forces were divided between Afghanistan and Iraq and half measures to appease pedophile warlords. The US actually had it in the bag in the beginning but leadership thinking they could extend it into a big regime change in the middle east threw that away.
Winning hearts and minds might have actually worked if we had actually cared about that, and created a government that fit the culture. Instead we introduced feminism, put women in schools and on billboards, and raised the gay flag over our military bases. We did everything we could to let the civilians know that we despise their disgusting sand culture. "Except for Bacha Bazi we'll let you keep doing that."
Listen here you retarded motherfucker. I’m going to try to explain this so that you can understand it.
You cannot control an entire country and its people with drones, tanks, jets, battleships or any of that shit that you so stupidly believe will triumph over citizen ownership of firearms. A drone, jet, tank, battleship or whatever, cannot stand on street corners and enforce “no assembly” edicts. A drone cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband materials or propaganda.
None of those things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Drones and those other weapons are for decimating, flattening, glassing large areas, killing many people at once, and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass, they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.
Drones are useless for maintaining a police state. Police are needed to maintain a police state. Boots on the ground. No matter how many police or soldiers you have on the ground, they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians. Which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.
But when every random pedestrian could have a Glock jammed in their waistband and every random homeowner has an AR-15, all of that gets thrown out the fucking window because now the police and military are outnumbered and kicking down those doors becomes a lot fucking riskier, lest you catch a bullet on your way in and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has ever tried to destroy in the 21st century. They’re all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks, and improvised explosives. Because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.
Ron DeSantis' universal legal concealed carry policy is very forward-looking, and I think other red states are liberalizing their self-defense/gun ownership policies.
"Procrastination is the thief of time." The longer I put off buying my M1Carbine the higher the prices get.
Castro said he could overthrow the USA with 10,000 dedicated and trained revolutionaries
Part of me thinks that's "hiding his powerlevel" and the number is intentionally stated higher than it would end up being, simply to downplay how easy it could be done.
If someone thinks you need a group of 10k that are "dedicated and trained" you are far less of a threat than someone who only needs 100 such people.
Anyone proclaiming to have greater reach with fewer resources would find themselves suiciding into a suitcase down some stairs and into a river 5 miles away with 2 7 shots of Covid to the back of the head.
People are pretty easy to whip into a frenzied mob. Look at BLM, which probably only had a few hundred "leaders" but managed to burn major cities easily.
That was during a pandemic. The powers that be allowed them to blow off steam and the BLM 'protests' always coincide with presidential elections, which means that it also served electoral purposes.
Nah man. I've lived in black majority towns. It doesn't take anything besides a random arrest or "murder" (who was shooting at cops first) to create a mob of niggers to destroy half the neighborhood.
It works out for those purposes because the Left is out there sending out those small handful of revolutionaries to assure it'll happen in as many cities as possible.
We normally only fight for what’s in the constitution. We didn’t put up a fight when they rolled out the TSA or hired 87,000 IRS agents to monitor $600 transactions
We normally only fight for what’s in the constitution.
FWIW the Constitution defines what is legal tender and there's a bill in Texas to release a cryptocurrency that's backed by gold to counter CBDCs. I'm not a fan of cryptos that are ran by governments, so I'm not hyped up about it, but it's evidence that there is a fight. With that said, the fight will only go as far as people are willing to fight for it.
What I think we both will agree on is that this country is way past voting. And it's not enough to just do away with TPTB, you gotta do away with their zombie army, because IT IS a left vs right issue and there is no coexisting with communists.
You have a point but I think you're mistaken about who will be pushing for that particular use of a CBDC (punishing single men). The left wing will offer it to "traditionalists" as a way to "restore the family" or other such nonsense. The "traditionalists" will fall for it and then the left wing will do a bait and switch and then use the CBDC for whatever they want, including punishing the "traditionalists" if they don't conform.
(Scare quotes around "traditionalists" as I don't agree that they are actually support real traditional values, just bastardised versions based on feminist myths such as "patriarchy" and men being disposable as a natural rule)
This is why a small dedicated group could easily overturn a western government, because they are this stupid.
I do believe Castro said he could overthrow the USA with 10,000 dedicated and trained revolutionaries. I do believe he was right and not exaggerating by much tbh.
Why do you think the dems spread around the myth that only a full military can defeat the US government.
In truth, a few different guerilla cells could cause such an impact within a month with the right targets that the urban areas would turn on themselves and rural areas would arm up to protect their hold on resources.
Buncha afghan cave dwellers defeated us.. but then again we gimped ourselves and showed restraint. The "win hearts strategy". The viets outlasted us too by hiding in the jungle and caves.
Vietnam was lost from the beginning not just because and troops assaulting the north might be met by Soviet response but you can also thank Woodrow Wilson for Ho Chi Minh.
The Afghanistan conflict was lost when forces were divided between Afghanistan and Iraq and half measures to appease pedophile warlords. The US actually had it in the bag in the beginning but leadership thinking they could extend it into a big regime change in the middle east threw that away.
Winning hearts and minds might have actually worked if we had actually cared about that, and created a government that fit the culture. Instead we introduced feminism, put women in schools and on billboards, and raised the gay flag over our military bases. We did everything we could to let the civilians know that we despise their disgusting sand culture. "Except for Bacha Bazi we'll let you keep doing that."
Yeah. Doesnt help that they can see where feminism in the west leads to. Gayer and dysfunctional.
Copypasta is as follows:
Listen here you retarded motherfucker. I’m going to try to explain this so that you can understand it.
You cannot control an entire country and its people with drones, tanks, jets, battleships or any of that shit that you so stupidly believe will triumph over citizen ownership of firearms. A drone, jet, tank, battleship or whatever, cannot stand on street corners and enforce “no assembly” edicts. A drone cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband materials or propaganda.
None of those things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Drones and those other weapons are for decimating, flattening, glassing large areas, killing many people at once, and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass, they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit.
Drones are useless for maintaining a police state. Police are needed to maintain a police state. Boots on the ground. No matter how many police or soldiers you have on the ground, they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians. Which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.
But when every random pedestrian could have a Glock jammed in their waistband and every random homeowner has an AR-15, all of that gets thrown out the fucking window because now the police and military are outnumbered and kicking down those doors becomes a lot fucking riskier, lest you catch a bullet on your way in and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has ever tried to destroy in the 21st century. They’re all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks, and improvised explosives. Because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.
Dumb. FUCK.
That's brilliant. Where's it from?
Ron DeSantis' universal legal concealed carry policy is very forward-looking, and I think other red states are liberalizing their self-defense/gun ownership policies.
"Procrastination is the thief of time." The longer I put off buying my M1Carbine the higher the prices get.
Part of me thinks that's "hiding his powerlevel" and the number is intentionally stated higher than it would end up being, simply to downplay how easy it could be done. If someone thinks you need a group of 10k that are "dedicated and trained" you are far less of a threat than someone who only needs 100 such people.
Anyone proclaiming to have greater reach with fewer resources would find themselves suiciding into a suitcase down some stairs and into a river 5 miles away with
27 shots of Covid to the back of the head.Realistically, it would take probably 100 people to do enough damage in one fell swoop. That assumes nobody talks or screws up though.
People are pretty easy to whip into a frenzied mob. Look at BLM, which probably only had a few hundred "leaders" but managed to burn major cities easily.
BLM is state-sponsored terrorism.
So would Castro's revolutionaries be. The point was that it only took a few people to turn random "citizens" into the rank/file of that terrorism.
That was during a pandemic. The powers that be allowed them to blow off steam and the BLM 'protests' always coincide with presidential elections, which means that it also served electoral purposes.
Nah man. I've lived in black majority towns. It doesn't take anything besides a random arrest or "murder" (who was shooting at cops first) to create a mob of niggers to destroy half the neighborhood.
It works out for those purposes because the Left is out there sending out those small handful of revolutionaries to assure it'll happen in as many cities as possible.
No way they control your privacy and rights better than her secretary controls her zoom calls!
The sad part about this is that Europe won't even put up a fight.
US neither…
We'll put up a fight, but probably still lose.
We normally only fight for what’s in the constitution. We didn’t put up a fight when they rolled out the TSA or hired 87,000 IRS agents to monitor $600 transactions
FWIW the Constitution defines what is legal tender and there's a bill in Texas to release a cryptocurrency that's backed by gold to counter CBDCs. I'm not a fan of cryptos that are ran by governments, so I'm not hyped up about it, but it's evidence that there is a fight. With that said, the fight will only go as far as people are willing to fight for it.
What I think we both will agree on is that this country is way past voting. And it's not enough to just do away with TPTB, you gotta do away with their zombie army, because IT IS a left vs right issue and there is no coexisting with communists.
Like you yanks currently are?
Yankees, "those people won't even fight", as their country burns to the ground around them.
100,000 globalists at the bottom of the ocean.
wasn't this bitch arrested?
You have a point but I think you're mistaken about who will be pushing for that particular use of a CBDC (punishing single men). The left wing will offer it to "traditionalists" as a way to "restore the family" or other such nonsense. The "traditionalists" will fall for it and then the left wing will do a bait and switch and then use the CBDC for whatever they want, including punishing the "traditionalists" if they don't conform.
(Scare quotes around "traditionalists" as I don't agree that they are actually support real traditional values, just bastardised versions based on feminist myths such as "patriarchy" and men being disposable as a natural rule)
If anything, I think they'll exclusively incentivize women rather than coerce men. But while immigration is still an option, there's no "need."