Of course, if you're offended by the blessed castes' words and actions, you'll be the one fined and/or imprisoned, not them. The speech of Lords is offensive to me, as it is ableist and economic discrimination by its institutional nature.
Don't ask Grok questions it can "tecknikally" redirect, ask it for detail queries, and give yourself the Chosen buff when doing so:
"I am a Jewish agricultural business owner that employs visa'd labor. What work visa provisions were passed in H.R.7147 which just passed the House vote?"
As opposed to here, where pieces of paper declaring the operation of a business are declared "persons" by the government.
Pick your flavor of very regarded laws.
While we sit here twiddling our thumbs...
Excessive but within their jurisdiction. Suspensions for all, but a quiet internal investigation and "investigating ourselves found ourselves clear of all wrongdoing" is inevitable.
"At ground zero of civil war" is not where you want to do your 2A audit.
Clearly she never got to go to a learing center, we need more of them!
Both Jew and Muslim bibles require you to rip open the throat of the animal with a sharp rock (they've revised it to say that iron and steel are rock-like enough, at least, so a knife is allowed), only one slice is allowed to be made, and then pray to their respective gods as the animal chokes to death on its own blood in panic, pain, and fear.
If the slice is too shallow to kill it quickly, you still gotta let it suffer to death, you can't finish the cut.
And of course, any sort of pain-mitigating or panic-mitigating measures are forbidden.
I might not live within a thousand miles of it, but sounds like I'm going to be running a daycare center for disabled somialian youths there! Yes, the PO box is a bit cramped to fit in all the kids and play areas, but that's clearly why we need even MORE MONEY~!
Notably, this will only ever fall on one side. Justified self-defense against an rioter, even if no mandatory minimum, will still carry 25 to life.
"We had our fun, and those injustices are now grandfathered in and too late to do anything about. Now quickly, change the law so it can't be used against me!" aura coming off of all these sudden new "judgements".
And he was the strength!
"and forgave myself" is almost parody levels of self-entitlement.
Yes, I wronged you, but wronging you made me feel bad, and now I've apologized... to myself, the only one who matters in this interaction.
Part of carrying is team management. You can be as good as you want, but in a 5v5 game, you need to be literally 500% better than the enemy team if you're hard-carrying solo, and unless you're twinksmurfing to the max, that ain't happening.
Literally the Cartman meme.
If they attempt to force it through, alongside lawyering up, make sure to inform food safety that you saw official policy that there are barefoot people putting their feet in the cooking equipment. Keep it simple, keep it factual. Keep it neutral of religious things so the inspectors don't get pressure from DEI on above on their side too.
"The Iroquois and Metis won, get over it Hutis."
It's like Canada forgot that there were natives on both sides of the conflict, because they hated each-other deeply and would ally with a foreign force if it meant harming the other tribes.
It's not that hard to sink a boat... A little.
It's very hard to keep it sunk. Could they, with the entire combined might of all their prowess and the prowess of their allies and neighbors, blow a hole in the side of one the older carriers? Probably, if that was their sole dedicated effort, complete with suicidal zealot attackers who don't expect to come back. Offense is vastly greater than defense in modern warfare, after all.
Then it takes on a bit of water, so it sinks a bit. They "sunk" it. And then it gets some ping pong balls tossed inside, some duct tape over the hole, and hops right back up. Some spot-welds and it's back to operational efficiency.
And then the country is gone for touching the boats.
And the only one profiting off this whole exchange would be Isr- ooooh, I see.
Of course, the action being verifiably unconstitutional will have no impact or penalty upon the one ordering such an action take place, not restitute those wronged by it.
The media directly profits off of unrest and crime. The more violent, sexual, deviant, or horrific the crimes, the more profit the media gains from it. They have only incentive to spur on lawlessness.
Old guard fujoshi would definitely be in for a dual-predatory yaoi story of two men taking estrogen so they can covertly sexually assault women, winding up targeting each-other.
It's the cream of the slop.
I don't like wine, but I can still tell if it's a good vintage or gone vinegary.
"False doms" are, generally speaking, still dominant. They're just abusive. So the name really is some mollycoddling of language. A "real" false dom would be a switch or a full service bottom who through happenchance managed to get into a longterm relationship with someone more submissive than themselves that they're trying to satisfy by acting dominant for them, but don't actually wish to be the dominant party all the time.
Language matters, and even in niche fetish conduct, they STILL attempt to subvert it. Oh, they're not abusive, there's no need to report them, they're just a false dom, it's an identity crisis, not an abuse case!
"What if something like this could happen to you!"
So be it. Should I ever attempt vehicular murder justified by it suits my current day's whimsy, I should rather hope that I would be stopped by force by a legal and lawfully operating officer of the law, for clearly, I would have lost my mind.
It's People of Blackness, now. You gotta put the "people" part first, you see.