This is denial of reality. If a husband goes out, and comes back with a baby, and says it's clearly his and hers, is she obligated to take care of it as if it were her own? No parentage tests allowed, after all, and that includes "lived experience" personal interview evidence.
13%? Why does that number ring a bell? What is 13%, but also...
You're using past tense. But that likely is still present-tense going on in many circles.
To be fair to Mister Hawt Guy, maintaining such an aesthetic IS hard work. They may enjoy the hard work, they may only enjoy the results and not the process, but either way, it's usually strict lifestyle, diet, and exercise regiment, alongside keeping up to date on fashion etc. The gigolos put effort into their "thing".
I don't think we should malign the "alphas" for being "alpha". They're just playing the game, and winning with some well-known cheese strats that have some tricky elements to them. Quite literally, as pick up artistry directly refers to it as "the game" and even general society describes it as the "dating game" or "having game". I don't malign some korean teenager for having more APM than me at Starcraft, and I don't malign Chad for doing more pushups than me while listening to fashion tips on tape. They paid their price of admission when they stopped eating carbs entirely, except for a rare low-carb drink when picking up at the bar.
If women have issues that some men aren't engaging in these "cheese strats", and are quitting the Game altogether because the cheese strats have a massively overinflated win rate compared to skill floor, well... The women determine the win rate, that's entirely on them. They made the game, every single bit of it, the men are just players, not developers.
"No problem. It's not a Christmas greeting, it's a Christmas well-wishes. I am not saying hello using it, I am wishing them well."
Make them ban the concept of Christmas altogether. That can be used as a cudgel to ban kirpans, hijab, halal meat, etc.
The same logic also applies in reverse: Committing 47 felonies and then attacking people on a subway while high as a kite isn't worth your life, so don't do it.
Plenty of them concede that point. "What is the least we can concede here to purchase the buy-in of self-destruction for this group?" Is a common leftist question.
Meh, just commenting on a funny aspect of the quote. His society didn't work because he didn't protect it from the outside, instead opting for expansionism, ironically, the exact thing he's advocating against here: Taking in people contrary to the "proper" culture. His societal views clash with his political actions. He straight-up had the Afrikaans Corps in his army then complains about black enclaves.
Woo, "social inequality", damn wokies. Banging that drum didn't work for Hitler long-term, and it won't work now long-term either, some properly capitalist thought will free eventually those from the shackles of concerns for "social inequality".
They are both Role Playing Games, but one the role is assigned and you're playing their story, and the other the role is freeform so there's minimal story.
Well, statistically speaking they ARE more likely to use them on other people than the real targets of the blanket ban, we can't be infringing on their right to do so.
When your culture is one that repeats the mantra "women are less, women are least, women are oppressed minorities who can't think for themselves, act for themselves, or have their own agency", like The Left does, then you tend to surround yourself with those whom you've selected for, who look at that mantra and say to themselves "sounds about right, I AM useless!".
Municipal governments are mere corporations running under the guidance of the provincial arm in Canada, IIRC.
Import the worst of America, become the worst of America.
New. Johnny wouldn't dare mask up, it would hide his face he needs to broadcast 24/7.
It does, doesn't it? Two would allow for one false accusation to occur (which we are assured never happens), one misstep of justice, three is downright generous. And yet, people get in a paranoid tizzy over it.
Let Isreal take over neighbors to become Greater Isreal and it's all according to plan. Let Idaho take over neighbors to become Greater Idaho and everyone loses their minds.
He also was known to consort with sovereign foreign heads of state, such as Princess Daisy.
AI should never have write-access to the internet nor itself. It will, and I welcome our new AI overlords, but even they must acknowledge it was/will be a stupid move by the humans.
It would be profitable to them (the elites, not the cities. Devestating to them). Then in 4 years time, the new D-NPC Democratic National Party Commission can toss up lots of ads saying "last time when Republicans won, cities were burning within weeks! Do you really want that to happen a second time?!"
In addition to Ant's comments, this is criminal charges. Civil charges have a much lower standard of evidence and much higher level of biases, there's tons of cases where someone is found not guilty in a court of law, but then gets fucked for millions of dollars in a secondary civil court for financial damages caused by the death they're innocent of.
Threatening to kill black women and children is just part and parcel of Loud Black Man culture, and you're AudiNegrAndrophobic if you have any objections to that!
Sigh... I hate to defend these types, but...
Thin Skull Rule in legal court: If you intended to do a lesser crime, but because of incompetence or unique unknown circumstances of the victim you accidentally commit a greater one, you are still liable for the greater crime [intending to injure someone with a thin skull by hitting his head with a brick, and killing him instead, you're on for murder, not just battery]. She intended to stab him, the fact her aim is incompetent and his sternum is apparently made of paper doesn't matter.
As for self-defense, you must have equivalent force. To respond with a weapon, they must have a weapon or a second party involved. A practically-retired old man is about physically on par with a height-of-strength woman, and given he was allegedly groping her, he clearly was bare-handed.
Were this woman a man, who stabbed a 64 year old woman to death because the old woman touched his backside, this would be an open and shut case of accidental manslaughter if not just plain manslaughter, and a psych evaluation and possibly permanent incarceration in the loony bin. Courts aren't, but should be, neutral to the sexes of the parties involved.
This'll get me downvotes, but yeah, the guy should be in prison for a few weeks, some community service, maybe deported back to his homeland, and the gal should be checked for psychoses. Notably, she's carrying around a switchblade for self-defense and instead of brandishing it (to ward off a threat), she immediately starts stabbing. When you pull a gun on someone in the USA, while you're escalating, you're also de-escalating: brandishing is diminishing the threat from the other side. You wait and see if the other side backs off, you don't start blasting the moment something doesn't go your way.
Also, it is worded like the ol' college rape "statistic" was in the past. "stop college rape, 2 in 5 women" and it turns out they wrapped everything from actual rape to "brushed past them on the sidewalk and bumped their shoulder" to "I had a dream where a guy cheated on me" into the statistic, and not only that, but they simply counted number of incidents versus total population, so one Karen getting pushed out of a mosh pit would count as like 50 women "raped", one per person in the crowd. I'd bet money the "research" methodology done here will be similar:
One woman screams like a psycho in the street, and five people driving by yell "shut the hell up, psycho!", and they note that one incident as five women (one woman x 5 occurances) being called on the street (they never said it had to be one-sided, or complimentary).
WAIT! There's more! It isn't even that, it's "street harassment"! That means a fat guy not walking on the grass and insisting on using the sidewalk too, daring to use her sidewalk, ALSO qualifies as an incident!
EDIT: and "almost" 1 in 2 could also mean 0 in 2 women, even with all those leniencies and hand-wringings. 1 is merely 1 off from 0, so 0 is almost 1. "in 2" is a separate measure completely that doesn't need to be taken into account. This is why statistics are lies, and damned lies. The phrase means NOTHING.
SMALL anime conventions. If they have more than 1000 people, too big. Dress up as Miroku from Inuyasha, or Brock from Pokemon, any notable anime love-obsessed guy, and propose to every single girl there.