Trust the science!
The person that electrocuted drug dealer killed does indeed look like a child, but it's the electrocuted drug dealer who is on trial, not the dead child he killed and admitted to have killed.
Kudos to their honesty, I suppose, though not their genocidal racial prejudice.
They fear bringing His gaze upon themselves so much that they can't even write down a word commonly associated with Him. Whether you pronounce it Yahweh or Jehovah, He is one God well known to love us, we should not fear His attention... Though I suppose evildoers should. Hmm. How odd.
My company wage-matches on a retirement plan, so my "savings" are simply the maximum on that they're willing to match. After all, 100% ROI instantaneously is about the best you can ever do in the markets. But I'm not allowed to touch for many, many years, without jumping through a LOT of hoops. Savings I actually realistically have access to? Probably a year, assuming ideal conditions.
This "OTH" race seems pretty reasonable. We clearly need more OTHs in politics. They're bimodal, either hating whitey or know whitey is core to the society, so they already map onto the political landscape pretty well.
"We have detected several 'teen' lifeforms converging on this location!"
"Just 'teen'?"
"Yes. There is no further descriptors available. Wait, new information is coming in... Some of them may possibly be future doctors and engineers."
No issues here for kotakuinaction2.win, using Brave with basic NoScript.
There's middle ground. 100-hour JRPGs that aren't open-world.
He's a Jew in spirit. Also by familial relation, he has a Jewish daughter. Might be enough for them.
How about the ones who committed the crimes 23+ hours ago? Or does the UK only convict the people who have aged out of criminality, to ensure the crime rate stays high?
It's clearly changing market forces. Economic pressures.
Monkey Pox still exists, it's not like they eradicated the disease, but they chose in their wisdom to memory hole it once they realized the spread vector.
Eww, they want to have less AI and more "localizers" in their translation team? Big red flag.
Same virtue applies: There's nothing stopping you from running in your district. And nothing stopping everyone else from voting on you.
You could just, you know, NOT make babies. But then there wouldn't be a lucrative business side-hustle.
The issue isn't "boomers". It's that in the demographics, for 18-29, "likely voters" number in the dozens, while for 65+, "likely voters" is nearly 100% of the demo.
It doesn't matter how you poll, how the retweets go, how many memes feature you... If your demographic is useless when it comes to voting day.
There are WAY more aged 18-64, than 65+. But if they're busy jerking off to OnlyFans or the best of 4chan's conspiracy boards about how voting does nothing, instead of voting, while the people who don't know what a "computer" is just reliably mindlessly go in massive blocks to the voting booths, well, the result seems obvious.
Even way back then, it wasn't him, it was some off-chance by an intern writer.
I could see one out, thanks to Black Myth Wukong airing their own dirty laundry during its development, about SBI: Find some communique, some email or phone record or meeting minutes, prior to the hiring, that shows it was done under duress. BlackMyth went on public record stating that the wokists blackmailed and threatened their business, and they chose to not engage, and got a massive smear campaign as a result.
Of course, they should only do this if such is true. If they engaged in this practice willingly, they should be full-throated supporting their own decision, not whinging and half-backtracking-but-not-really about it. But if they came out and said "Yes, Sarkessain is in the credits, we were extorted and afraid, and didn't know what to do, but now that its out and can stand on its own merits without the journo's threats... fuck 'em." it MIGHT help.
Smart homes, dumb people. Smart people, dumb homes.
I don't think there's a "right answer" except to have maybe googled her name once in passing prior to hiring her, but without a time machine, there's no real solution. The taint is present now. Ousting it publicly would get tentative buy-in from true gamers, but would lose the sheep who read Kotaku who would inevitably write many smear articles.
Even if it was 100% game balancing consultation... For some reason...
This is the idiot who in an interview, got a question of "name a single game. Any game at all... Seriously, just say one game title that you've ever played, in your entire life... If you need a second to think about it, go ahead, just one game.", and couldn't answer.
If you're that uninformed about video games, you're not going to be able to balance one.
The fact she is married to a man, and has a daughter, is clearly proof that she's gay. Don't you see?!
The real answer is "if game fun, why main character attractive? Ahh, must be because main character gay. Straights cannot be interesting or attractive, categorically. Therefore, since interesting AND attractive: Gay."
Remember, they view themselves as all that is good in the world, and define "evil" as simply "not them". Therefore, if they find something good, it must be "them". And it is only the actions of "evil" that try to seek to prove otherwise.
In the modern era of mass-reporting and botted emails, that's all it takes to engage in cancel culture.
Taking the longshot long-term bet, I see.