7
Ralt 7 points ago +7 / -0

It was a great abuse of the FBI that gave fuel to democrats and the media but was any of it illegal?

First, you need to realize that the FBI generally exists to abuse people, not to save them or provide the american people a service. If they provided a service, they would be a business.

Why aren't Republicans doing more to highlight all that happened?

They're dumb cucks who are just progressives driving the speed limit. They have the same goals as leftists, just two decades slower. The extremely pro-MAGA people like MTG seem decent as far as I've looked into them, but you have like 5 or 10 of them compared to the entire party of uniparty useful idiots.

2
Ralt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stuff like Zeitgeist and Loose Change were fascinating when I was very young, but I would urge you to watch the Ryan Dawson link I included over any others.

5
Ralt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not aware of any 9/11 documentary that has been successfully scrubbed from existence no matter how outside of the mainstream it is.

Here's Ryan Dawson:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DfWlEAbmARe8/

Here's Alex Jones:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkTCQjWOOgo

Here's Loose Change:

https://loosechange911.com/

Here's Zeitgiest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaIcXwhHgZI&t=866s

Ryan Dawson would be my go-to though. I put him at the top for a reason.

/edit

If you really want to start understanding "What is going on" you need to go much further back. I would generally recommend "The Creature at Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, "The Progressive Era" by Rothbard & Newman, and "The Managerial Revolution" by James Burnham.

4
Ralt 4 points ago +4 / -0

I might steal it once it becomes widely available. I sure as fuck am not giving them a single cent. Stop funding your enemies.

4
Ralt 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can definitely echo the others opinions on the speed of the chapters. I kept purposefully not reading the book so I would have something to say when the thread rolled around, but it just lead to me being completely out of sync. This is very arbitrary, but I think if we were doing 6 chapters per week it would fit better. Idk though, everyone reads at a different speed.

I was 3 chapters ahead most of the time, now I'm 3 chapters behind because I ended up a little too enthralled with other books.

I found the bit where they got him to explain his marriage as a pretense for arresting him one of the most human interactions I've ever read. "Yes, tell us more about your 'customs', we just need you to admit to breaking laws once more, and look into the camera while you do it..."

I love the complete sham of a congress they set up to be "elected", reminds me of ours. It was also wonderful to see him immediately realize "Wait, we fed the results of the election into Mike, and I'm supposed to trust that even remotely?".

Then Heinlein calls "tricking the other side into striking first" as the "pearl harbor" stategy, holy mother of based revisionist history I didn't expect that. Even when I talk to people about false flags and pretense for war, they much more easily accept chicanery around WW1 than WW2.

Really liked the Profs speech on government and tradition and taxes, very anarchist. The only thing better than that was them following up and telling him "Well, if that's the constitution you want, you're going to need to be king to create it". The ways Heinlein flits between anarchy and monarchy while treating democracy as a tool to fool the people, feels like the most modern thing about the book.

It feels like Heinlein is constantly avoiding describing combat, chapter 23 was so short! I can't blame him though, violence is always hard to write.

I wish I had read this before reading The Expanse, I would have been far less impressed by the idea of throwing meteors.

16
Ralt 16 points ago +16 / -0

To be fair, he doesn't actually teach much of anything of value. He's infotainment at best.

If you want to actually learn something about hardware, Louis Rossmann is excellent even if he's mostly moved into lobbying for right to repair.

5
Ralt 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because the USA has been "socialist" since like 1890? Why would the USA try to stop what the USA has been purposefully spreading for over a hundred years?

Socialism is a weird word for it, I think James Burnham described what modern governance is best in The Managerial Revolution (I'm only halfway through, but it's enlightening).

After reading your other comments though, I'm not sure why I'm clicking save on this comment. You've had several excellent book recommendations, including Burnham and Hoppe, and you've purposefully just decided to scream incoherently.

5
Ralt 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's funny to me, how exactly like Communists Libertarians can be, constantly focused on revolution, but the angle this books takes is thankfully smarter. Heinlein seems very aware that you only need a highly motivated percentage to enact a coup, and the way they don't shy away from violence, a lot of modern Libertarians could learn a thing or two about. It did make me laugh how they talked about Lenin's cadre but after learning about Lenin's trip to America and funding, it just comes off like Heinlein wasn't aware of his whole history.

It's funny to me how much I don't give a shit about the computer being trans, as it's a computer and not some 5 year old kid.

Wyoming feels like a man to me, but perhaps that's because I've never met a woman who pointedly cares about freedom, and certainly not to the point where they would do violence, gladly, to achieve it.

I certainly liked the Prof going on his spiel about "rational anarchy", as that is just how most people act online. Sure downloading copyrighted video is against the rules, but no one actively gives a shit and probably even the majority routinely break those rules. It also reminded me of learning about agorism, and realizing that I had been a natural agorist for all of my 20's, just funny to see it all written down and codified.

4
Ralt 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is beautiful. I didn't suggest WINE because I figured recommending linux just to run 16-bit winapps would be complete overkill, the fact someone ported WINE onto windows is incredibly recursive and pleasing.

5
Ralt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've really liked it thus far but that's not surprising, I really enjoyed him immediately going to the "selling children" aspect of...whatever this society is. I became aware of peoples screeching about dave rubins test tube kids right after I finished reading the bit about host-mothers, was funny.

The anachronisms are super funny, and it really took my brain a second to adapt to the speaking pattern. I downloaded a few different versions before I realized the broken english was on purpose.

4
Ralt 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is good feedback I feel. If OP is targeting us weirdos, it won't really go far. We already automatically hate Hasan, or don't even know about him.

I feel that this videos content would fucking kill it on like a TheQuartering or RekeitaLaw, but Hasan is just too easy of a target for us, he's literally retarded.

2
Ralt 2 points ago +3 / -1

I didn't say anything about this issue or the content of this specific video, just about Chris himself.

2
Ralt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just FYI, Chris and crew are weird as fuck. I definitely get more information about China than I had before watching their show, but just be aware of what is publicly known about falun gong and the connections to china uncensored and other NTD media.

The guy I'm linking is a complete China simp, just fyi, but, I found his criticisms on Chris to be true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x15Cmhgb70

4
Ralt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cool, I just finished what I was reading and will totally interrupt my next planned reads for this one.

It's awesome that you've kept up on this, btw.

7
Ralt 7 points ago +7 / -0

Last week Github's recommendation was just a list of various DDoS tools pre-configured to attack Russian business/government sites. Normally a felony, now happily promoted on the top of trending of one of the largest websites from one of the largest American companies.

Let alone the fact that it will spawn a Russian side of the "hAcKeRs" narrative, where they can claim we do it to.

7
Ralt 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good, anything that bites into the bullshit of intellectual property I give a thumbs up.

7
Ralt 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's an optional ad, that you could literally turn off, and you are being compensated to look at it monetarily.

Look into Brendan Eich, he's responsible for the whole thing, and I find him palatable. You may not.

9
Ralt 9 points ago +9 / -0

I doubt you will get him to totally reverse course.

Instead, promote "real" subversive leftist writing and thinkers. Manufacturing Consent by Chomsky is a great place to start from before he completely lost his Marbles and began supporting the war machine.

3
Ralt 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's super adorable that you think they need to justify any of their actions. If you must browse reddit, at least delete your account.

6
Ralt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anyone know the name of the female actor? I'd like to look her up and see if she's been raked across the coals or if she's publicly repented, etc.

3
Ralt 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the contemporary republican party could stand behind even 1/5th of what the Jacksonians did, maybe I wouldn't despise them.

-1
Ralt -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh no, I'm only up several thousand percent! Whatever will I do!!!!!!

12
Ralt 12 points ago +12 / -0

FWIW, Intel has hidden chips in chips since '08 (Intel-ME), and AMD since 2013 (AMD-PSP).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

This is just another layer of shit on top of shit from shitheads.

1
Ralt 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are not free to preach, as they have been physically removed, so to speak.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›