Ryan Dawson would be my go-to though. I put him at the top for a reason.
/edit
If you really want to start understanding "What is going on" you need to go much further back. I would generally recommend "The Creature at Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, "The Progressive Era" by Rothbard & Newman, and "The Managerial Revolution" by James Burnham.
Btw, what are your top 5 pieces of evidence supporting the official story?
Excellent use of sarcasm in a misdirection attempt, but nobody's biting. It's possible to oppose a poorly-constructed argument without adopting the contrapositive. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Stuff like Zeitgeist and Loose Change were fascinating when I was very young, but I would urge you to watch the Ryan Dawson link I included over any others.
Not to think that they would do it (as politicians are so beneath contempt that they definitely would), even if they were able to pull something like that off, but that they would get away with it.
I have yet to hear an intelligent WTC conspiracy theory that is even remotely plausible. Military airplanes going into it? A missle hitting the Pentagon? The passengers being flown to bases to be executed? C'mon man.
I don't care about any official "story", I just know that the "steel beams don't melt" are BS. And that it's very unlikely for the reason specified earlier.
Not sure whether you're the arbiter of anything resembling the truth when you flippantly called months of documented dodgy aspects of the vaccine propaganda "unsubstantiated [opinions]".
You have a lot of hubris lecturing anyone about "insanity".
Nowhere does that comment say there were no dodgy aspects of vaccine propaganda, only that one loon who claimed that Pence could make Trump president who was so obsessed with hating on vaccines that he called T "the orange buffoon".
So you're just lying. And yes, even your own comment now demonstrates that I am a superior arbiter of truth than you.
What lie? Again, waiting for you to substantiate any of your verbal diarrhea.
Such rage-filled nonsense.
Here's the lie: show me where I asserted that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop.
No need -- you were already shown direct links where you're provably full of shit, and you just deflect.
No, I was already shown links where I was correct, and which you attempted to deflect by falsely asserting that I said that there were no dodgy aspects to vaccine agitprop.
"Objective" meaning what AOV approves of, of course.
And which he can demonstrate. But stay in your echo-chamber where vaccines don't even do the elderly any good.
You've been shown plenty, ignore it (again and again and again), go to emotional appeal, and waste everyone's time by deflecting or parroting the reverse. Anything, really, that gets you scot free from answering fuck all.
I'm done with you, go to Imp, maybe he can indulge you in whatever ridiculous conversations you two have.
I'm not aware of any 9/11 documentary that has been successfully scrubbed from existence no matter how outside of the mainstream it is.
Here's Ryan Dawson:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DfWlEAbmARe8/
Here's Alex Jones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkTCQjWOOgo
Here's Loose Change:
https://loosechange911.com/
Here's Zeitgiest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaIcXwhHgZI&t=866s
Ryan Dawson would be my go-to though. I put him at the top for a reason.
/edit
If you really want to start understanding "What is going on" you need to go much further back. I would generally recommend "The Creature at Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, "The Progressive Era" by Rothbard & Newman, and "The Managerial Revolution" by James Burnham.
Excellent use of sarcasm in a misdirection attempt, but nobody's biting. It's possible to oppose a poorly-constructed argument without adopting the contrapositive. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Stuff like Zeitgeist and Loose Change were fascinating when I was very young, but I would urge you to watch the Ryan Dawson link I included over any others.
The pentagon part is the most suspicious out of everything. I haven't seen too much but this video goes over a lot of good areas.
You probably had a day off. It's very easy to misremember things.
Not sure why you would think insane conspiracy theories would be closer to the truth.
Not to think that they would do it (as politicians are so beneath contempt that they definitely would), even if they were able to pull something like that off, but that they would get away with it.
I have yet to hear an intelligent WTC conspiracy theory that is even remotely plausible. Military airplanes going into it? A missle hitting the Pentagon? The passengers being flown to bases to be executed? C'mon man.
I don't care about any official "story", I just know that the "steel beams don't melt" are BS. And that it's very unlikely for the reason specified earlier.
Not sure whether you're the arbiter of anything resembling the truth when you flippantly called months of documented dodgy aspects of the vaccine propaganda "unsubstantiated [opinions]".
You have a lot of hubris lecturing anyone about "insanity".
Nowhere does that comment say there were no dodgy aspects of vaccine propaganda, only that one loon who claimed that Pence could make Trump president who was so obsessed with hating on vaccines that he called T "the orange buffoon".
So you're just lying. And yes, even your own comment now demonstrates that I am a superior arbiter of truth than you.
Still waiting on you to substantiate your claim of "unsubstantiated" vax opinions.
Trump ran Operation Warp Speed, and some people aren't happy with it for a number of reasons. I see nothing surprising or wrong about that at all.
Also, this:
Fuck you.
Ah yes, let's ignore your whopper of a lie, and troll a la Reddit for SOURCES.
How about you show me where I said that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop? Thanks.
Yes, because they are insane and obsessed. Availability of the vaccines is an objective good.
So well-informed.
What lie? Again, waiting for you to substantiate any of your verbal diarrhea.
No need -- you were already shown direct links where you're provably full of shit, and you just deflect.
"Objective" meaning what AOV approves of, of course. As past threads here, and many sources including Epoch Times show, that's extremely debatable.
Such rage-filled nonsense.
Here's the lie: show me where I asserted that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop.
No, I was already shown links where I was correct, and which you attempted to deflect by falsely asserting that I said that there were no dodgy aspects to vaccine agitprop.
And which he can demonstrate. But stay in your echo-chamber where vaccines don't even do the elderly any good.
You've been shown plenty, ignore it (again and again and again), go to emotional appeal, and waste everyone's time by deflecting or parroting the reverse. Anything, really, that gets you scot free from answering fuck all.
I'm done with you, go to Imp, maybe he can indulge you in whatever ridiculous conversations you two have.