Yeah. I'd consider israel to be a MASSIVE net negative.
Their culture is degenerate and corrosive, their economic contributions are a massive drain on others (namely Germany and USA), their philosophy is vile kikery, absolutely reprehensible. They argue about the concept of raping 3- year old babies - what the FUCK does that contribute to philosophy?
Given this, they'd rank even below countries like Somalia.
Can you name one country that has contributed more to art, science, philosophy, or economically than Israel?
Sure. Germany, Britain, France, Austria, USA, Russia, Sweden, Norway, Spain, Greece, Italy, Hungary, Japan, Korea. Is that enough? israel comes way down on the list, far below White nations.
I generally can’t understand why anyone would dislike them.
Uh, because 96% of US media is owned by jews (what you call the "Mainstream Media" is literally the jewish media), the entire finance system is owned by jews, the jews ran the Transatlantic Slave Trade, the jews spearheaded Bolshevism (and killed 20-50 million Russians plus the Holodomor), they spearheaded feminism and mass 3rd world importation, the jews brought a world war upon Hitler because he overthrew their finance system and arrested a Rothschild, the jews were kicked out 1030+ times out of 109+ countries and the biggest reason was treason by siding with the host country's enemies, usury, human sacrifice rituals, coin clipping, oh and the jews also own almost all politician in the US including Trump via things like AIPAC, zionist subversion of Christians, Epstein (he ran kind of a reward system for proven traitors by handing them children to fuck, cannibalism and torture videos, etc).
Your actual president is Netanyahu, which is why your country started a war with Iran on behalf of the jews. YOU filthy goyim will get NOTHING out of it, your life will only get worse.
And no, God won't embrace your beloved jewish overlords - they believe Jesus is rotting in hell in feces, and they literally worship Moloch (known as Satan) and believe they are tricking God with things like the Eruv.
until the day i die
Be careful what you wish for, that day may be sooner than later!
Khan, a student at the University of Delaware
Ah, so it's the upper echelon of the enrichment!
Fascinating. Still not going to watch pedowood goyslop.
Well, it's worse than that, but essentially, yes.
Well, the AfD is not ready to be in power as the Republicans are. Yet. They will be ready when all they ask for is a minor decrease in immigration of ~10%, or demanding loyalty to jews and israel as an immigration requirement, as the AfD will be THE zionist party loving israel unconditionally.
All their cultures, traditions, values, and everything else come from their religion.
Well, ok. That's quite a big claim, and it's also big matter of criticism, along with the idea that the deity they worship is Moloch, known as the Christian Satan, which represents essentially evil ("Synagogue of Satan"). Given that, the culture that emerges from that would be... not particularly nice.
Most of the genetic differences between human groups are too mild to account for most cultural differences
Here's a map of the average IQ by country. This is actually by far the biggest factor where genetics (particularly intelligence) determine culture.
For example blacks in Africa (IQ 60-65): Cannibalism, high brutality, a culture of rape being normal, never having invented the wheel or written language, having tribal wars, culture of near-zero work ethics, no planning into the future, shamanistic or plain insane belief systems.
Gypsies in Hungary (IQ ~71): Education generally stops around 8th class, common thievery and fraud, extreme littering, their yards look like shitholes, basically nowhere near sophisticated professions or jobs (lawyers, judges, bookkeeping, banking, healthcare). I haven't even seen a single gypsy cashier even.
In India (IQ ~77) there are practices which involve feces, like eating it, bathing in it, throwing it around in festivals. And notorious defecating in the open, and absolutely nauseating practices in food creation. Then there are the scam centers, the incompetent programmers ("foreign talent"), Bollywood.
In Japan (IQ ~106) work ethics are extraordinary and the code of honor valued to an extreme, unhealthy extent, even in corporate areas which makes it hard for employees to quit their jobs. Crime rate is also extremely low, and it's clearly distinct from the rest.
In Mexico (IQ ~87) gang violence occurs, drug and human trafficking, quite some corruption, but none of the crazy things.
So clearly average intelligence by country (aka race) is the underlying pattern. Some variance exists (the Chinese are quite weird for IQ ~104), but there are no Whites or Orientals who gang rape or rape babies to cure AIDS for example. Calling these differences "mild" is quite an understatement, if the right word would be "extreme."
such as the cultural differences between the east and west Germans is clearly coming from decades of Communist rule on one side and not the other.
Sure. So are all countries in Europe different from each other to varying degrees. The difference between any European country and India however are still extreme.
African Christians and Europeans Christians actually have similar cultures due to Christianity making their cultures similar.
Essentially Christianity is a perversion of what it actually is in Africa. They simply rebound to voodoo and shamanism again, and use Christianity as a veneer. The same applies with Islam too of course. So no, minimal similarities.
it's the fastest possible form of social change.
Well, that's debatable, but not too relevant. In essence religion is an extension of a culture, and it follows the goals of that culture. The Christian God doesn't not demand human sacrifices because of luck, but because Whites do not want to have human sacrifice rituals. Christianity uncoincidentally demands its followers to do what Whites already did or know they should do. This goes for all other religions as well.
You cannot swap Christianity with Islam while keeping the cultures (and therefore populations) for example, because neither of these cultures' populations would want it. It simply goes against their collective wills.
Voodoo fits blacks in Africa, just as Christianity fits Whites, or Greek/Roman belief systems fit them 2+ millennia ago, or Hinduism fits Indians, or Judaism fits Jews. Religion has always been a reflection of the culture that inhabited it - and if it doesn't fit well enough, it could branch off and create sub-versions of it like Protestants, Evangelicals, Amish, Catholics, Orthodox, etc. Historically it's not a smooth, fluent process of course.
The people we refer to as "Assyrian Christians" have basically nothing in common with the people who worshiped Ashur, even genetically at this point
Well, that's quite reasonable. If the people cease to exist who have religion X, religion X also ceases to exist.
Culture can change quite violently, and can be heavily based on external factors.
True, communism is one example. But communism basically abolished Christianity in the Soviet Union and replaced it with a worship of "Socialism" and "Equality." Sure, that was slower, but the cultural change was so rapid (basically like a tyrannical foreign occupation) that it took time for religion to follow. That's an anomaly, and I am talking about generalities.
I am glad I figured out the misunderstanding.
The religion informs everything else.
If that were true all atheists would be the same, including a lot of Japanese, Chinese and Koreans. Clearly that's not the case. The Chinese slave laborer is different than me for example.
The reason it's an ethnic group is from the religion.
Genetics -> race -> culture <->>> religion.
While culture and religion influence each other, culture affects religion way more. Culture is an extension of the collective being of a given population, manifesting itself in tradition, behaviors, legal systems, government, economic systems, level of technology, religion, language and more. It's not about art exhibits in museums.
all of it is defined by the religion.
Then why are Europeans different even though they have similar religions? And why are Christian Africans WAY different than European Christians? Why are South Americans different than North Americans even though they share the same religion?
Religion is clearly not the reason. It's culture. And culture derives from race. And race derives from genetics.
Without Judaism, jews can not exist.
That doesn't apply to any other ethnic group on the planet though, and if true (which isn't), it would be unique to jews. Which would be weird because there were and are many atheist jews. And atheists tend towards leftist ideologies. There are atheists from all countries, and I don't see many similarities between them all over the world.
Religions come and go, culture is way more consistent and slow-changing.
Thinking about it today, I see where the confusion may come from.
"Jewish" is not a matter of religion. It has to be understood like a nationality. It is a combination of race (genetics), culture, religion, language, traditions. You can be an atheist jew (which many consider themselves to be), indicating that religion is just a factor that is optional.
Communists in general and communist Jews are notoriously atheist. Many Jews also don't speak Yiddish. However even many among those have a special loyalty towards Jews and even take part in Jewish traditions.
It appears there is wide-spread consensus about this, even Jews see it that way. So this was never about religion.
Normal people don't scream incessently about "early life" and are not paranoid of jews.
I didn't say he was "normal." I said for normal people there was sufficient evidence to substantiate a claim like that. If it's true or not is irrelevant. And it is not your prerogative to determine what claims are wrong or correct.
So, don't evoke what normal people consider to be evidence
It doesn't matter what people think about it. Those with sufficient intelligence are more likely to properly assess information, or even look it up themselves (which you still haven't btw). Only because the lowest common denominator is too bad at evaluating claims, doesn't mean you should ban people based on what a hypothetical idiot is capable to process.
As for being in court, you can not establish that someone is secretly a jew because you saw a surname and assumed their religion.
In court the rule of in dubeo pro reo exists, which has a whole lot of reasons, like preventing excess of power, ensuring legal protocol for police, requiring and properly assessing evidence, and not abusing the accused in various ways.
This is not a court. This is mere people talking. In a court you couldn't even claim 2+2=4 without an "expert" (hyperbolically speaking). And I don't think it's even secretly - it's quite obvious, but nobody is talking about it. Nobody is explicitly saying they are not jews either, as to not draw attention to it, because people would flock and debunk that claim easily.
Several. Turns out Muslims aren't a race either.
Do I really need to specify what "White" means?... Caucasians. Not Turkeys, not Arabs, not Jews, not Orientals, not Eskimos, I mean actual native Europeans whose ancestors lived in Europe for 1000+ years.
So could it be that with "several" you meant 0 then? Because all Muhammads you claim to know are NOT native Europeans, but foreigners with bright skin colors?
It's certain for at least 2 out of 3. and for the third one it's just "likely" (50%+). It doesn't matter what YOU think about that, especially if you put up unreasonable levels of scrutiny. But to normal people it is enough evidence to confidently claim that. If anything, it would be an unexpected surprise if it weren't true. It's not a court, and in dubio pro reo does not apply.
And you just ban people out of personal whim. Have you even bothered to look it up before you ban people out of your personal disagreement?
You literally do not know that they are jews
How many Whites have you ever seen who are named Muhammad? Clearly the name is a strong indicator of origin, just as skin color is a strong indicator of race, and education/profession is a strong indicator of IQ.
It sounds like some janitorial tyranny, halfway or more to Reddit. Go over to Gaming, at least there are no overly censorial mods, and you can be open about what you say.
It's easy to look up. Rittenhouse shot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Joseph Rosenbaum - 100% jew. It's among the most jewiest names possible.
Gaige Grosskreutz - Quite a jewish name, and indeed has family and neighbors who are jewish.
Anthony Huber - Uncertain, but it appears to be a jewish family name.
You are fully aware that all of them were white
Wrong, jews are not White, they consider themselves something else. In fact they like to switch around as needed, but they internally they consider themselves distinct from Whites. To which we all can happily agree.
So your accusation is defamatory (accusing of lying) and based on ignorance.
I don't think it was ever identified that any of them were jews
Your ignorance is not an argument. At least 2, likely 3 out of 3 were jews.
The other two were a communist
All 3 were communists. Weren't they literally all members of Antifa anyway? Antifa was originally created as a violent arm of jewish communists in Germany, and it appears to still be that, but internationally.
Given this
Your premises are wrong. Just admit that you exert tyrannical janitorial powers all due to ideological reasons. At least don't lie and pretend you are something you are clearly not.
I am glad people start to realize the truth.
The entire Covid hysteria was the end of my tolerance for bullshit.
You're complaining that I've targeted intentional fraud
You accuse him of "lying", not fraud, because fraud is a criminal act that is intended to gain material personal advantage, and it does not necessitate the act of lying. Deception and psychological tricks can do it too.
I'm not arbitrating truth.
That's exactly what you did. Here:
To be clear, all evidence suggests that the books being burned by the French and Soviets [...]
You claimed X happened, someone else (probably) said Y happened, and you claim that you are right and he is wrong. And not only did you delete his comment (to deprive everybody from reading it), you also banned him (so that he cannot even prove his points).
He just happens to know what the truth is and is intentionally obfuscating it.
Isn't that the standard thought process of all who persecute dissidents since humanity exists, neatly summarized in the word "denial"? It suggests there is an unquestionable truth, and then some bigot asshole chooses to be evil and say the wrong thing for the lulz. Then he gets censored, jailed, burned, killed, etc.
Had he engaged in simply stating his opinion honestly, it wouldn't have been an issue, as I said.
And what if you just called it a lie (even "fraud" to make it sound scarier) so that you have a publicly legitimately appearing excuse to ban him? What if YOU were the dishonest one? You lied about it being a "fraud" after all (ignorance or an attempt to deceive?), so will you punish yourself too? Of course not, honesty, which you demand from others, is not important for you. You just want a particular narrative to prevail. And if others lie, but it's something that aligns with you, they don't face repercussions.
That is censorship. Just admit it.
The books burned by the Nazis were pseudo-science books mostly written by leftists. For example hyper-sexualization books, sexualization books meant for minors, "gender theory", and various other degenerate things. Also books that meant to lie about history.
You know, the same as today.
Oh, and you are the pinnacle of truth? Glad you know everything and are confident enough to outright ban users over it.
Do you know what I hate most? Not mere stupidity, not even arrogance, not even maliciousness. It's this pure arrogance combined with stubbornness and ignorance. You represent that perfectly.
Just think, the comment you deleted CANNOT BE SEEN and you cannot be argued with. WHO THE FUCK would take YOUR word for anything you say? Who do you even want to convince?
And what the fuck is with your post history... you are a rabid janitor who is out of control, sniffing his own farts. You are just hated by most people, and you do a terrible job... unless your job is to ruin the forum.
You are the type of person who'd fit perfectly into some censorship job as a cogwheel in the machine of the Soviet Union. You know, for example when someone requests documents, you are the one striking through large swaths of text with a black marker. Or, in a higher position, you'd be the one determining which returning Soviet soldier has to be put into gulags for witnessing things he wasn't allowed to. Pathetic.
It's almost like the victors of WWII wrote history, and it happens to align perfectly with their narratives and their intent to push homosexuality and racial "diversity."
Imagine I tell you about 2 games and everything I say about the first is positive, and everything I say about the second is negative. Oh and if you question anything, or ask questions, I can legally apply violence.
What a coincidence! Truly peculiar.
And immediately debased it.
You mean during the war that was forced upon Germany? Or before, in which case do you have some source to read up on that?
I mean the economic boom occurred anyway, so regardless of that, it lasted long enough for that.
Read Gobbels accounts of the war.
How about you link something instead of me having to go through data for hours, in order to eventually counter myself? I tried to look for it myself btw, but it seems made up.
I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies.
I don't lie. Lying is pathetic and truth is on my side.
The NSDAP did literally none of those things.
Uh, based! But still, they are complaining about the holocaust till today. But yeah, they pretty much removed a lot of bad influences from the people.
None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost.
Did you even check the links I provided before? The book burnings are quite relevant to this btw. "What type of books were burned?" is something nobody asks:
A recently published book, Gay Berlin, reveals the history of the city as a liberal hotbed of homosexuality before the Nazis came to power in 1933. Berlin was known as a mecca for cross-dressers, transsexuals, and those seeking male-to-female surgery.
The Frankfurt School, a group of German-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century, has been credited as the architects of leftism.
They, including Magnus Hirschfeld, were the authors. They also created the terms "homosexual" and "transvestite." Please don't belittle jewish contributions!
homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself
What, there were 2 closeted homosexuals? And that is equal to a "liberal hotbed of homosexuality"? Oh come on, that attempt was very cheap.
because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis
Good. Being in debt is not something anyone should strive for.
The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period.
Oh, you mean before Hitler replaced the currency with a system in which 1 hour of labor equaled 1 of the currency? Was it when people were pushing wheelbarrows of money due to hyper-inflation, which was urgent because over the course of 1 day it may have become worthless? Was it before or after Germany stopped paying insane reparations for WWI? Was it after or before they arrested a Rothschild? I think you are mixing up time a bit.
This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.
What? I can't find anything about that. Did you just make it up?
Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.
During Olympics foreigners are required, as guests. And the Red Cross from Switzerland that visited the concentration camps and made reports. And other Whites can be guests as well. This "foreigner" thing was really only about jews to be honest. Germany had no problems with Austrians, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Belgians, Swiss, etc.
It's your policy.
No. Literally nobody cares about it.
Your position is his position.
I haven't told you my views at all. What Hitler did at his time was reasonable (arrest and deport communists, degenerates, self-declared enemies of Germany), but today we are facing much bigger issues.
Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.
Oh, not "solely"... you can add Feminism and Consumerism to the mix too, if that's any consolation.
No, you're intentionally assuming things.
Maybe you weren't clear with: "There isn't a difference."?
No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.
So you think hiring 90% of a certain race ("preference") vs 100% ("exclusive") is such a big difference that one is ideological, and the other is natural? If we'd go by nature, it would be 99%+ btw... so wouldn't it make sense to assume the former with the "preference" is the ideological one that is deviating from the norm? Maybe an ideology that ignores everything except pure selfish monetary benefit, that is sociopathically utilitarian in that pursuit? At which % does it start to become more like the leftists' ideology? 75%? 60%? 50%? 0%? They literally have quotas btw.
National Socialism.
It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense... in that case damn that filthy evolution!
Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.
That's exactly what I said in the past too. Boy was that stupid. Common conservative rhetoric nonsense. But let me highlight their agendas in a comparison:
Marxist Socialists: They believe in "equality", believing all humans are born equal, and stripped of equality due to the inherent corruption of society. Thus altering society according to their ideas of wealth equality should bring society to a "fair" and "just" status.
Problem: Equality is a fabrication, a myth, entertained only as an idea, as fiction, but with no root in reality. So it ended in genocide and a LOT of corruption to a point bribery was often occurring.
National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country. They seek to eliminate harmful vectors like degeneracy and usury, usually coming from foreigners in order to improve all people of the country.
The rest? Not sure if that matters much, but being nationally protectionist is clearly important to them. Communists called them "capitalists" if that means anything.
And here is the third side: Conservatives: They have no inherent belief except to preserve the status quo, and maybe lean towards Libertarianism while ignoring all consequences in a naive way. They are patriotic to the imagination of what their country is, but they have zero intent to EVER restore it to its former glory. Instead they pride themselves about how they are not "racist" (and accuse leftists to be), how they are the ones who actually love homosexuality and transvestites. But it should just be reasonable, you know? At least inform the parents that you are going to chop their dicks off - that is the right amount of pushback for them. They long settled with the idea of homosexual marriage, and that the "cultural melting pot" is forever going to haunt them and their children.
The political spectrum is a triangle, "left" and "right" is insufficient to describe them. It leads to the mistake that you conflate 2 ideologies that are in staunch opposition to another.
No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group.
Oligarchy is not the result of mere hierarchy. And it also matters if it's merit that lands you there or pure exploitative-amoral behavior. You could argue it's normal that it's the latter.
You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.
One? Well, someone did some research and calculation. If the Rothschild wouldn't be artificially excluded from these lists, they'd all occupy the top 9. Of the "official" top 9, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg are jewish. So of the top 18 there are 12 jews, which makes it 66%. That's a little more than "one", isn't it?
There isn't a difference.
So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same? We are entering 2+2=5 area here. They are not the same, you just pretend it is out of ideological reasons. Maybe you believe the only relevant distinction is "racist" vs "non-racist"?
Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior.
Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals. So what "ideology" are you talking about? "Common sense?"
or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.
So do we have to talk about the very concept of "change"? This is just some wild, baseline nonsense in a desperate attempt to make a point. You know it's nonsense, but you will play it in hopes it lands.
Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas. After WWII, things started to change. The Marxists have taken over the US Democrat party, and it slowly turned into the neo-Marxist mess it is today. Not a single person would vote for both, the US Democrats of the past and today.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
- They promote degeneracy, weakening the cultural-societal foundation of our people
- They promote the mass importation of foreigners, which effectively is a genetic genocide
- They promote the resource transfer from Whites to foreigners (welfare)
- They promote race mixing ("cultural melting pot")
- They promote acts of violence against Whites
- They accuse Whites of "racism" whenever possible, but ignore things like racial groups that discriminate against Whites
- They enact injustice directed against Whites
- They have Antifa as "civil" troops to target White dissidents
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
In a 2021 lecture at Yale University titled “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,” psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani described her “fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step, like I did the world a favor.”
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
Leftism was invented by whites.
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
Why am I blocked? Even with a private window... is Hungary blocked?