Maybe you weren't clear with: "There isn't a difference."?
No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.
So you think hiring 90% of a certain race ("preference") vs 100% ("exclusive") is such a big difference that one is ideological, and the other is natural? If we'd go by nature, it would be 99%+ btw... so wouldn't it make sense to assume the former with the "preference" is the ideological one that is deviating from the norm? Maybe an ideology that ignores everything except pure selfish monetary benefit, that is sociopathically utilitarian in that pursuit? At which % does it start to become more like the leftists' ideology? 75%? 60%? 50%? 0%? They literally have quotas btw.
National Socialism.
It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense... in that case damn that filthy evolution!
Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.
That's exactly what I said in the past too. Boy was that stupid. Common conservative rhetoric nonsense. But let me highlight their agendas in a comparison:
Marxist Socialists: They believe in "equality", believing all humans are born equal, and stripped of equality due to the inherent corruption of society. Thus altering society according to their ideas of wealth equality should bring society to a "fair" and "just" status.
Problem: Equality is a fabrication, a myth, entertained only as an idea, as fiction, but with no root in reality. So it ended in genocide and a LOT of corruption to a point bribery was often occurring.
National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country. They seek to eliminate harmful vectors like degeneracy and usury, usually coming from foreigners in order to improve all people of the country.
The rest? Not sure if that matters much, but being nationally protectionist is clearly important to them. Communists called them "capitalists" if that means anything.
And here is the third side: Conservatives: They have no inherent belief except to preserve the status quo, and maybe lean towards Libertarianism while ignoring all consequences in a naive way. They are patriotic to the imagination of what their country is, but they have zero intent to EVER restore it to its former glory. Instead they pride themselves about how they are not "racist" (and accuse leftists to be), how they are the ones who actually love homosexuality and transvestites. But it should just be reasonable, you know? At least inform the parents that you are going to chop their dicks off - that is the right amount of pushback for them. They long settled with the idea of homosexual marriage, and that the "cultural melting pot" is forever going to haunt them and their children.
The political spectrum is a triangle, "left" and "right" is insufficient to describe them. It leads to the mistake that you conflate 2 ideologies that are in staunch opposition to another.
It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense
Then let's get back to you admitting your bullshit.
This is not about you crying about 'common sense' and 'pointing out patterns'. This is me calling you out about Judeo-Capitalism, and you pretending to be stupid.
National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country.
Nope, this is an explicit lie. National Socialism is not nativistic, and it's not anti-foreign. It is about the gleichschaltung of a race into a Volksgemeinschaft administered by the state. "Foreigners" are not really a concept because it would not be within the state anyway. A state's boundaries become the boundaries of the 'blood'. It's not about removing foreign interference from a state, it's about abolishing that state and making a new one.
Nativism is totally irrelevant. The nation doesn't have to be of a region for the state to occupy it.
Removing foreign influences is literally what the German National Socialists did. They removed jewish influences (pro-degeneracy, Marxism, usury) in politics, media, culture, economy and lo and behold, somehow an unprecedented economic boom occurred, the culture recuperated, child prostitutes were no more, rampant homosexuality and transvestism was gone, and Germany became a world power.
I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies. The NSDAP did literally none of those things. None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost. Followed by the fact that culture hadn't changed, homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself, and usury as a concept really doesn't apply here because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis, and only the largest organizations sponsoring re-armamentation got loans anyways, and those were subsidized by money printing.
The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period. The SDP lost the election because after having recovered the German economy from their own policies, they were pledging to re-institute all of the old policies. Nazi revisionism took credit for an economy that had already recovered, and then proceeded to lie about how good the economy was after it had already made it, while the economy immediately turned to shit due to central planning and high-inflation of printed money again. This is because of the National Socialist's Socialist policies. This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.
Of course they are
No they wouldn't. That's what Gleichshaltung is about. Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.
Who the fuck cares about muh' Gleichschaltung even?
It's your policy.
I don't know how the hell you crafted your theories up, but it doesn't seem to have much connection to reality.
They're not mine, Hitler wrote them down. This is one of the reasons you can't lie about it. Your position is his position.
And by the way,
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.
I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies.
I don't lie. Lying is pathetic and truth is on my side.
The NSDAP did literally none of those things.
Uh, based! But still, they are complaining about the holocaust till today. But yeah, they pretty much removed a lot of bad influences from the people.
None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost.
Did you even check the links I provided before? The book burnings are quite relevant to this btw. "What type of books were burned?" is something nobody asks:
A recently published book, Gay Berlin, reveals the history of the city as a liberal hotbed of homosexuality before the Nazis came to power in 1933. Berlin was known as a mecca for cross-dressers, transsexuals, and those seeking male-to-female surgery.
The Frankfurt School, a group of German-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century, has been credited as the architects of leftism.
They, including Magnus Hirschfeld, were the authors. They also created the terms "homosexual" and "transvestite." Please don't belittle jewish contributions!
homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself
What, there were 2 closeted homosexuals? And that is equal to a "liberal hotbed of homosexuality"? Oh come on, that attempt was very cheap.
because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis
Good. Being in debt is not something anyone should strive for.
The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period.
Oh, you mean before Hitler replaced the currency with a system in which 1 hour of labor equaled 1 of the currency? Was it when people were pushing wheelbarrows of money due to hyper-inflation, which was urgent because over the course of 1 day it may have become worthless? Was it before or after Germany stopped paying insane reparations for WWI? Was it after or before they arrested a Rothschild? I think you are mixing up time a bit.
This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.
What? I can't find anything about that. Did you just make it up?
Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.
During Olympics foreigners are required, as guests. And the Red Cross from Switzerland that visited the concentration camps and made reports. And other Whites can be guests as well. This "foreigner" thing was really only about jews to be honest. Germany had no problems with Austrians, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Belgians, Swiss, etc.
It's your policy.
No. Literally nobody cares about it.
Your position is his position.
I haven't told you my views at all. What Hitler did at his time was reasonable (arrest and deport communists, degenerates, self-declared enemies of Germany), but today we are facing much bigger issues.
Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.
Oh, not "solely"... you can add Feminism and Consumerism to the mix too, if that's any consolation.
Maybe you weren't clear with: "There isn't a difference."?
So you think hiring 90% of a certain race ("preference") vs 100% ("exclusive") is such a big difference that one is ideological, and the other is natural? If we'd go by nature, it would be 99%+ btw... so wouldn't it make sense to assume the former with the "preference" is the ideological one that is deviating from the norm? Maybe an ideology that ignores everything except pure selfish monetary benefit, that is sociopathically utilitarian in that pursuit? At which % does it start to become more like the leftists' ideology? 75%? 60%? 50%? 0%? They literally have quotas btw.
It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense... in that case damn that filthy evolution!
That's exactly what I said in the past too. Boy was that stupid. Common conservative rhetoric nonsense. But let me highlight their agendas in a comparison:
Marxist Socialists: They believe in "equality", believing all humans are born equal, and stripped of equality due to the inherent corruption of society. Thus altering society according to their ideas of wealth equality should bring society to a "fair" and "just" status.
Problem: Equality is a fabrication, a myth, entertained only as an idea, as fiction, but with no root in reality. So it ended in genocide and a LOT of corruption to a point bribery was often occurring.
National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country. They seek to eliminate harmful vectors like degeneracy and usury, usually coming from foreigners in order to improve all people of the country.
The rest? Not sure if that matters much, but being nationally protectionist is clearly important to them. Communists called them "capitalists" if that means anything.
And here is the third side: Conservatives: They have no inherent belief except to preserve the status quo, and maybe lean towards Libertarianism while ignoring all consequences in a naive way. They are patriotic to the imagination of what their country is, but they have zero intent to EVER restore it to its former glory. Instead they pride themselves about how they are not "racist" (and accuse leftists to be), how they are the ones who actually love homosexuality and transvestites. But it should just be reasonable, you know? At least inform the parents that you are going to chop their dicks off - that is the right amount of pushback for them. They long settled with the idea of homosexual marriage, and that the "cultural melting pot" is forever going to haunt them and their children.
The political spectrum is a triangle, "left" and "right" is insufficient to describe them. It leads to the mistake that you conflate 2 ideologies that are in staunch opposition to another.
Then let's get back to you admitting your bullshit.
This is not about you crying about 'common sense' and 'pointing out patterns'. This is me calling you out about Judeo-Capitalism, and you pretending to be stupid.
Nope, this is an explicit lie. National Socialism is not nativistic, and it's not anti-foreign. It is about the gleichschaltung of a race into a Volksgemeinschaft administered by the state. "Foreigners" are not really a concept because it would not be within the state anyway. A state's boundaries become the boundaries of the 'blood'. It's not about removing foreign interference from a state, it's about abolishing that state and making a new one.
Nativism is totally irrelevant. The nation doesn't have to be of a region for the state to occupy it.
I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies. The NSDAP did literally none of those things. None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost. Followed by the fact that culture hadn't changed, homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself, and usury as a concept really doesn't apply here because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis, and only the largest organizations sponsoring re-armamentation got loans anyways, and those were subsidized by money printing.
The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period. The SDP lost the election because after having recovered the German economy from their own policies, they were pledging to re-institute all of the old policies. Nazi revisionism took credit for an economy that had already recovered, and then proceeded to lie about how good the economy was after it had already made it, while the economy immediately turned to shit due to central planning and high-inflation of printed money again. This is because of the National Socialist's Socialist policies. This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.
No they wouldn't. That's what Gleichshaltung is about. Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.
It's your policy.
They're not mine, Hitler wrote them down. This is one of the reasons you can't lie about it. Your position is his position.
And by the way,
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.
I don't lie. Lying is pathetic and truth is on my side.
Uh, based! But still, they are complaining about the holocaust till today. But yeah, they pretty much removed a lot of bad influences from the people.
Did you even check the links I provided before? The book burnings are quite relevant to this btw. "What type of books were burned?" is something nobody asks:
They, including Magnus Hirschfeld, were the authors. They also created the terms "homosexual" and "transvestite." Please don't belittle jewish contributions!
What, there were 2 closeted homosexuals? And that is equal to a "liberal hotbed of homosexuality"? Oh come on, that attempt was very cheap.
Good. Being in debt is not something anyone should strive for.
Oh, you mean before Hitler replaced the currency with a system in which 1 hour of labor equaled 1 of the currency? Was it when people were pushing wheelbarrows of money due to hyper-inflation, which was urgent because over the course of 1 day it may have become worthless? Was it before or after Germany stopped paying insane reparations for WWI? Was it after or before they arrested a Rothschild? I think you are mixing up time a bit.
What? I can't find anything about that. Did you just make it up?
During Olympics foreigners are required, as guests. And the Red Cross from Switzerland that visited the concentration camps and made reports. And other Whites can be guests as well. This "foreigner" thing was really only about jews to be honest. Germany had no problems with Austrians, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Belgians, Swiss, etc.
No. Literally nobody cares about it.
I haven't told you my views at all. What Hitler did at his time was reasonable (arrest and deport communists, degenerates, self-declared enemies of Germany), but today we are facing much bigger issues.
Oh, not "solely"... you can add Feminism and Consumerism to the mix too, if that's any consolation.