This seems to be an intentional obfuscation of what was being removed. To be clear, all evidence suggests that the books being burned by the French and Soviets seems to have been outright National Socialist literature and propaganda, where as the Allied Information Control Division's censorship program covered Nazi literature, Nazi propaganda, militarist literature, propaganda critical of the occupation, and Nihilist literature.
If OC were actually being honest about this, he could have said clearly that "Nazi literature criticizing jews and freemasons" were banned. This is true, but he decided to obfuscate it as books that simply had nothing to do with Nazis. Just "criticism". The fact that he included "books of ideologies they didn't like and deemed as propaganda", is literally just another way of saying "National Socialist propaganda", shows his intentional dishonesty here.
Oh, and you are the pinnacle of truth? Glad you know everything and are confident enough to outright ban users over it.
Do you know what I hate most? Not mere stupidity, not even arrogance, not even maliciousness. It's this pure arrogance combined with stubbornness and ignorance. You represent that perfectly.
Just think, the comment you deleted CANNOT BE SEEN and you cannot be argued with. WHO THE FUCK would take YOUR word for anything you say? Who do you even want to convince?
And what the fuck is with your post history... you are a rabid janitor who is out of control, sniffing his own farts. You are just hated by most people, and you do a terrible job... unless your job is to ruin the forum.
You are the type of person who'd fit perfectly into some censorship job as a cogwheel in the machine of the Soviet Union. You know, for example when someone requests documents, you are the one striking through large swaths of text with a black marker. Or, in a higher position, you'd be the one determining which returning Soviet soldier has to be put into gulags for witnessing things he wasn't allowed to. Pathetic.
You're complaining that I've targeted intentional fraud designed to deceive people. I'm not arbitrating truth. He just happens to know what the truth is and is intentionally obfuscating it. It's not a difference of opinion, it is aggressive attempt to deceive. Had he engaged in simply stating his opinion honestly, it wouldn't have been an issue, as I said.
what were the books the allies burned?
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
Comment Removed for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
This seems to be an intentional obfuscation of what was being removed. To be clear, all evidence suggests that the books being burned by the French and Soviets seems to have been outright National Socialist literature and propaganda, where as the Allied Information Control Division's censorship program covered Nazi literature, Nazi propaganda, militarist literature, propaganda critical of the occupation, and Nihilist literature.
If OC were actually being honest about this, he could have said clearly that "Nazi literature criticizing jews and freemasons" were banned. This is true, but he decided to obfuscate it as books that simply had nothing to do with Nazis. Just "criticism". The fact that he included "books of ideologies they didn't like and deemed as propaganda", is literally just another way of saying "National Socialist propaganda", shows his intentional dishonesty here.
Oh, and you are the pinnacle of truth? Glad you know everything and are confident enough to outright ban users over it.
Do you know what I hate most? Not mere stupidity, not even arrogance, not even maliciousness. It's this pure arrogance combined with stubbornness and ignorance. You represent that perfectly.
Just think, the comment you deleted CANNOT BE SEEN and you cannot be argued with. WHO THE FUCK would take YOUR word for anything you say? Who do you even want to convince?
And what the fuck is with your post history... you are a rabid janitor who is out of control, sniffing his own farts. You are just hated by most people, and you do a terrible job... unless your job is to ruin the forum.
You are the type of person who'd fit perfectly into some censorship job as a cogwheel in the machine of the Soviet Union. You know, for example when someone requests documents, you are the one striking through large swaths of text with a black marker. Or, in a higher position, you'd be the one determining which returning Soviet soldier has to be put into gulags for witnessing things he wasn't allowed to. Pathetic.
You're complaining that I've targeted intentional fraud designed to deceive people. I'm not arbitrating truth. He just happens to know what the truth is and is intentionally obfuscating it. It's not a difference of opinion, it is aggressive attempt to deceive. Had he engaged in simply stating his opinion honestly, it wouldn't have been an issue, as I said.