16
MostlyPeacefulPoster 16 points ago +16 / -0

The democrats are the fuck you got mine party. After they get citizenship, the next agenda on their list is stealing as many resources from the other citizens which the democrats help the most with.

17
MostlyPeacefulPoster 17 points ago +18 / -1

The West hasn't been a Christian nation since ____ conquered Western countries 200 years ago.

11
MostlyPeacefulPoster 11 points ago +11 / -0

The worst part about it is that our society treats her as if she's anything more than a retard. A McDonalds worker adds more value to society than this woman.

6
MostlyPeacefulPoster 6 points ago +7 / -1

We're at the point with technology that if you aren't watching something in-person, then you can't know for certain whether it's real or fake.

32
MostlyPeacefulPoster 32 points ago +32 / -0

They apologize because they're advised by their lawyer that if they apologize they might get let off the hook. They don't really mean it. Though yes, I agree with your sentiment. I would double down by issuing a statement of how retarded the UK is.

23
MostlyPeacefulPoster 23 points ago +23 / -0

The elite in charge hate humanity. Every action they take and the media they promote and consume suggests this.

Take Jewish author, Yuval Harari, who wrote the book Sapiens. That book is promoted everywhere and Yuval has been invited out to speak at very significant events including the UN and WEF, etc... if you've read the book, it's clear that Yuval has a total and complete disdain for humanity. I have never read something more soulless in my life. Yet our elite celebrate this.

Another great example of the total disdain for humanity is the theology surrounding the Frankfurt School whose ideas were mostly founded by Carl Grünberg, a Jewish man, which was that the forefather of modern Social Justice and Critical Theory. The ideas at the core essentially being that all differences among humans is due to oppression from one group to another thereby ignoring all innate differences between groups of humans and pitting all humans against one another as oppressor or oppressed. This ideology is seen by our elites as ideal who've enshrined it into law by way of "Human Rights" which makes it illegal to make decisions to your own benefit which considers differences between groups of humans as being due to the nature of humans rather than due to oppression. The elite absolutely despise the fact that there are differences between humans because that is what being human means and they push this ideology on everyone that essentially makes it illegal to recognize differences as anything different than being caused by oppression. So when people point out what it truly means to be human, the elite get angry because they dislike humanity.

It would seem the elite have an ideal of what they want humanity to be that is actually in opposition to what humans truly are and because of this the elite hate humanity and anything that recognizes the truth of what humans are.

-3
MostlyPeacefulPoster -3 points ago +8 / -11

Tradcucks should not be confused with tradcons. A true traditional conservative would suggest women shouldn't vote, women shouldn't be in education, women shouldn't have wealth/assets of their own, that women should be considered property of men, that child support shouldn't exist, that the legal age of marriage should be 12yo, income tax should be abolished, the central bank should be abolished, etc... you know how things used to be traditionally. 1960s men are tradcucks because by the 1960s, feminism had already wrought its corruption through society. There are very few tradcons in society.

3
MostlyPeacefulPoster 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, it was a government op to refer to pajeets as Asians in order to hide them among the rest. Asian gangs could be Muslims, Indians, Chinese. Indian gangs is obvious. Muslim gangs is obvious. That's why they use Asian to hide what's truly going on.

51
MostlyPeacefulPoster 51 points ago +52 / -1

Think about all the mean stuff White people are posting on social media. What do you think the middle-easterners and Indians (please don't call them Asians as that's offensive to Asians and entirely a EU bullshit term trying to be forced on everyone else) are posting on their feeds? I guarantee it's 10x worse and not one of them is being arrested for it.

This is obviously a crackdown on White people specifically.

7
MostlyPeacefulPoster 7 points ago +12 / -5

Vance is dangerous. He hasn't actually presented anything tangible to help birth rates and families but he says he cares about birth rates and families. He says he cares about White births too but does he cares about them more than mixed-race and/or non-Whites? Doubtful and he'd of course never say that. So what's his policies? What policy ideas does he have to promote children and families? Until he's clear on that he's dangerous because the go-to for most politicians is tax + spend or something worse like implementing laws meant to control men but not control women's behavior and that's a bad move for solving the children+family situation.

23
MostlyPeacefulPoster 23 points ago +24 / -1

That's not really good evidence tbh. I knew a woman who was dead set against the covid vaccine but she got the covid vaccine because she wanted to travel. Women are easily influenced by things like the covid scenario. The statement you linked is pretty weak. I'd say there's like a 75% chance she got the covid vaccine.

2
MostlyPeacefulPoster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I think when all is said and done, DeSantis is the better politician for sure but I meant more in regards to their values/beliefs in what they would try to accomplish. They seem mostly the same. Although DeSantis might "get more done", he also would likely be far more willing to compromise to get things done while Trump was not so willing. The compromising isn't necessarily a good thing. Sometimes it's better to do nothing then make bad deals. I think overall between the two, it would probably still be a wash in terms of good they do for the country. I don't think either represent the radical change most people want.

4
MostlyPeacefulPoster 4 points ago +4 / -0

It really depends how one goes about trying to raise the birth rates. Remember, what ultimately gives women their power is their monopoly on sex. The only way to have kids is for women to have sex with men. This can have a reverse impact of lowering women's value if done properly.

4
MostlyPeacefulPoster 4 points ago +4 / -0

What morons. It's easy enough to know what the real meaning is if you look for it. The original says someone who lays with men refering to men laying with men or men having intimate relationships with men instead of women or HOMO fucking SEXUALs. Homosexual is just the modern way of saying what the Bible intended in modern words. There's no mistranslation.

5
MostlyPeacefulPoster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Disney+ is one of the cheapest forms of entertainment. What she really should be telling people to do is stop shopping for new clothes they don't really need, stop dying your hair when your natural color is fine, stop traveling and stop eating out at restaurants. That's probably the 4 biggest waste of money people spend things on that they really shouldn't be.

6
MostlyPeacefulPoster 6 points ago +7 / -1

Governments often get baby-making wrong. How do governments reduce birth rates? They "restrict and control" women. They don't pay women to have less kids, they tell women they have to have less kids or you will be penalized.

Often governments fail to do the reverse. They say to women, hey have more kids and we'll reward you. Women do not respond to this. If you want higher birth rates then you must force women into it. Have more kids OR WE WILL PUNISH YOU. Then you will get positive results.

7
MostlyPeacefulPoster 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because the man is responsible for his woman. I realize most men have had their balls cutoff by the government and let their woman rule over them but in reality HE'S STUPPOSER TO KEEP HIS BITCH UNDER CONTROL. She attacked the person responsibility for the argument because if the man was doing his job he either would have beat up his own woman or already have beat the second woman before she attacked him. Unfortunately, in modern gynocratic societies, men have 0 control over women which is why men should stay clear of women entirely.

1
MostlyPeacefulPoster 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ironically, White Supremacists have more in common with Black Supremacists than they do non-supremacist whites.

view more: Next ›