We should not embrace censorship here!
I disagree.
Censorship is required for the continuing function of any nation.
On a nation state level we used to go to great lengths to prevent other nations from propagandizing to our people. This was most prevalent with Russia. We stopped policing this and look what happens?
I have no issue with free debate, mind you.
I encourage it.
When it comes to publication or large scale distribution of materials harmful to the function of society, that's when there's an issue.
Why should we let elves freely print and disseminate homosexual tranny agitprop? Does this benefit the nation in any way? Of course not. It actively harms the nation.
Which is why I included this line:
Jury is out on whether that's a good or bad thing.
It could have been good, or it could have just ended the nation quicker.
You can say that the blacks would have bred like rabbits, you know?
Has nothing to do with democrats.
The whole country would have been overrun.
Unpopular opinion:
Without Roe v. Wade the United States would already have failed.
Jury is out on whether that's a good or bad thing.
The Samurai hates the negro.
Okinawans are pretty racepilled at this point.
Case dismissed.
🦞 BRING OUT THE DANCIN' LAHBSTAHS. 🦞
I don't give an inch anymore.
These days I tell kids to their face what is happening and what's to come.
They all reject it, until what I say is coming next comes to pass. That part puts the fear of God back into them.
Doesn't matter, you can still fake it.
The point is that instead of a well known and/or positive female role model they use a literally-who nobody that accomplished nothing in their life.
Communist nations all told women to get back into the fucking kitchen until the leadership consolidated power and realized they could become more rich by forcing women into factories.
then run to tradcuckery and beg for forgiveness while keeping their stolen wealth.
What wealth would they keep?
Under traditional Islam and Christianity all of a wife's belongings are the property of the husband. Unless the husband commits adultery he will never lose ownership of his wife, barring that the wife commits adultery in which case she is killed.
Christianity.
Women, fear your husbands.
In a just world this would be considered high treason and Tim Cook's corpse would be hanging from a lightpost outside a court house or city hall.
They aren't doing this in favor of feminism.
If they were, they'd be installing a statue of some well-known woman.
Instead, they're replacing a statue of one of the most well-known men in history with a literally-who.
If they were being serious about supplanting men instead of simply undermining western history, they'd have proposed putting up a statue of Marie Curie.
The rub is that they do not want to advance the idea that western culture has achieved anything.
That wasn't my impression, but we've already seen I've been wrong once in the thread.
This is why I changed my post.
You originally left me two rather hostile posts, but changed the other after rereading. I respect that.
I don't have a timestamp because I watched it a day or so ago, but when Schafer asked Fuentes about race nixing, Fuentes answered almost immediately that he was against it. Schafer then brought up the name of a black guy that Fuentes is friends with who holds a similar view, Bryson Gray.
No, people re-post clips of his stuff online. Even on YouTube.
And so I have to ask:
Are those channels supporting his views, opposed to them, or neutral?
I ask that because what you've said so far about Fuentes and his views leads me to believe you've only gotten clips that put him in a bad light. Especially since you tried to conflate him with Patriot Front.
I like Fuentes, though I disagree with him on certain issues. However, he's one of the most brutally honest when it comes to politics that I've seen.
So you listened to cherry picked and edited segments put together by people that hate him?
If you actually listened to this interview you'd say none of what you said prior.
He still had to be prompted and danced around it to see the reaction he could expect.
Wrong.
When asked he answered directly immediately.
Your viewpoint is invariably tempered by leftist media whom you claim to be against.
That's pathetic.
I'm not going to listen to a full livestream of someone I don't like and don't respect
As aside:
You should do exactly that. I listen to a lot of ConInc grifter streams, leftist streams, and all kinds of other bullshit.
Doing such is the only way you can honestly address and respond to conflicting opinions.
I fucking hate Destiny and Hasan, but I'd be intellectually dishonest if I simply discarded their opinions without a second thought because of their reputation.
If China wins, America will forever be the continent of murdering black men on an industrial scale.
Hard disagree.
If China wins blacks will be exterminated and America will become a lesson in how to not fall for the guiles of lesser races.
China does not care in the slightest about the leftist takes on race.
I don't even know what to say to you man.
I understand we have to, to continue humanity, but that doesn't mean it's logically a good idea.
"To continue to exist we have to do this, but it's not a good idea."
Just stop.
Take a step back and think about what you're saying.
It's not about emotions, dude.
Do you think having children is a worthwhile endeavor?
By the way, there's an entire argument against you that I'm ignoring. Care to guess what it is?
You're tripling down on bullshit, man.
I ask again:
Are you serious with this line of argument?
Can you think of nothing of value outside of money?
Why do you think a family exists? Why do you think the Christian view is that a woman is to fear her husband, and a husband to love his wife? Why does a marriage only exist as through and under God?
You're making a distinction where there is none.
No, they don't.
You're completely wrong and putting words in someone else's mouth.
What are you even arguing?
No traditionalist wants a dual income household.
You're doubling down.
It's not about what you think.
You stated that no man on Earth could testify as to gaining value from their marriage.
That is obviously retarded.
I disagree.
They already print money for it. They'd just print it harder like they're doing now, and the white vote would have been eclipsed.
The only solution in that situation would be a violent ethnic cleansing and retaking of land by force.