It's interesting how hard he keeps trying to hide his 'power level' knowing that his positions are so fundamentally repulsive to the general population that most people would reject him immediately out of hand.
Honestly, If he had any capacity for nuance instead of cultivation to outrage, he could make a genuine argument.
I've made the argument that universal suffrage should be ended and a property requirement be reintroduced, and I've also argued the point that political freedoms are far less relevant and important than political freedoms. These are sentiments that most people initially bristle against, but with a simple explanation they can at the very least appreciate the perspective.
Hell, I can stand here and make you an ethno-nationalist argument for Ireland; I'd base it off of an indigenous anti-colonial framework. And I can I probably get your average person to see the perspective of why women shouldn't have the right to vote (by explaining the problems of universal suffrage, and limiting the scope of governmental jurisdiction, and using the family as the base political unit besides the individual).
The problem with Nick, besides that he's not even a conservative, is that he isn't capable of making those arguments. He's rather just rant about "the femoids". It's worthless resentment pandering. It makes his self-aggrandizement even more patently stupid.
Fuentes does almost nothing to hide his power level, what are you talking about?
The only thing he's done recently is lay off the memeocaust references after getting banned from nearly everything for it.
He's openly against race mixing, against women in positions of power, anti-Israel, pro-Christian, etc.
I feel like you've never actually watched a stream or speech Fuentes has made and instead base your views around content others have made about him. Am I incorrect in this assumption?
I'm not going to listen to a full livestream of someone I don't like and don't respect. Instead, I've just listened to his rants and a good portion of the interview that OP linked.
He's openly against race mixing, against women in positions of power
He still had to be prompted and danced around it to see the reaction he could expect.
So you listened to cherry picked and edited segments put together by people that hate him?
If you actually listened to this interview you'd say none of what you said prior.
He still had to be prompted and danced around it to see the reaction he could expect.
Wrong.
When asked he answered directly immediately.
Your viewpoint is invariably tempered by leftist media whom you claim to be against.
That's pathetic.
I'm not going to listen to a full livestream of someone I don't like and don't respect
As aside:
You should do exactly that. I listen to a lot of ConInc grifter streams, leftist streams, and all kinds of other bullshit.
Doing such is the only way you can honestly address and respond to conflicting opinions.
I fucking hate Destiny and Hasan, but I'd be intellectually dishonest if I simply discarded their opinions without a second thought because of their reputation.
So you listened to cherry picked and edited segments put together by people that hate him?
No, people re-post clips of his stuff online. Even on YouTube. I actually sometimes get recommended his stuff (I assume before the channel hosting is inevitably banned).
When asked he answered directly immediately.
That wasn't my impression, but we've already seen I've been wrong once in the thread.
It's interesting how hard he keeps trying to hide his 'power level' knowing that his positions are so fundamentally repulsive to the general population that most people would reject him immediately out of hand.
Honestly, If he had any capacity for nuance instead of cultivation to outrage, he could make a genuine argument.
I've made the argument that universal suffrage should be ended and a property requirement be reintroduced, and I've also argued the point that political freedoms are far less relevant and important than political freedoms. These are sentiments that most people initially bristle against, but with a simple explanation they can at the very least appreciate the perspective.
Hell, I can stand here and make you an ethno-nationalist argument for Ireland; I'd base it off of an indigenous anti-colonial framework. And I can I probably get your average person to see the perspective of why women shouldn't have the right to vote (by explaining the problems of universal suffrage, and limiting the scope of governmental jurisdiction, and using the family as the base political unit besides the individual).
The problem with Nick, besides that he's not even a conservative, is that he isn't capable of making those arguments. He's rather just rant about "the femoids". It's worthless resentment pandering. It makes his self-aggrandizement even more patently stupid.
Fuentes does almost nothing to hide his power level, what are you talking about?
The only thing he's done recently is lay off the memeocaust references after getting banned from nearly everything for it.
He's openly against race mixing, against women in positions of power, anti-Israel, pro-Christian, etc.
I feel like you've never actually watched a stream or speech Fuentes has made and instead base your views around content others have made about him. Am I incorrect in this assumption?
I'm not going to listen to a full livestream of someone I don't like and don't respect. Instead, I've just listened to his rants and a good portion of the interview that OP linked.
He still had to be prompted and danced around it to see the reaction he could expect.
So you listened to cherry picked and edited segments put together by people that hate him?
If you actually listened to this interview you'd say none of what you said prior.
Wrong.
When asked he answered directly immediately.
Your viewpoint is invariably tempered by leftist media whom you claim to be against.
That's pathetic.
As aside:
You should do exactly that. I listen to a lot of ConInc grifter streams, leftist streams, and all kinds of other bullshit.
Doing such is the only way you can honestly address and respond to conflicting opinions.
I fucking hate Destiny and Hasan, but I'd be intellectually dishonest if I simply discarded their opinions without a second thought because of their reputation.
No, people re-post clips of his stuff online. Even on YouTube. I actually sometimes get recommended his stuff (I assume before the channel hosting is inevitably banned).
That wasn't my impression, but we've already seen I've been wrong once in the thread.