If they were, they'd be installing a statue of some well-known woman.
Instead, they're replacing a statue of one of the most well-known men in history with a literally-who.
If they were being serious about supplanting men instead of simply undermining western history, they'd have proposed putting up a statue of Marie Curie.
The rub is that they do not want to advance the idea that western culture has achieved anything.
She was a feminist lawyer, she probably accomplished a lot...just nothing good.
Everyone knows the story of Marie and Pierre Curie. It wouldn't work to rewrite it to make her the strong independent woman who dreams of male genocide that they all desire to be.
They aren't doing this in favor of feminism.
If they were, they'd be installing a statue of some well-known woman.
Instead, they're replacing a statue of one of the most well-known men in history with a literally-who.
If they were being serious about supplanting men instead of simply undermining western history, they'd have proposed putting up a statue of Marie Curie.
The rub is that they do not want to advance the idea that western culture has achieved anything.
Marie Curie worked with her husband and learned from him before he died. They even shared a Nobel Prize.
There's too much positivity towards men in her history, that won't work for feminists at all.
Doesn't matter, you can still fake it.
The point is that instead of a well known and/or positive female role model they use a literally-who nobody that accomplished nothing in their life.
She was a feminist lawyer, she probably accomplished a lot...just nothing good.
Everyone knows the story of Marie and Pierre Curie. It wouldn't work to rewrite it to make her the strong independent woman who dreams of male genocide that they all desire to be.