This is what Spengler was talking about. You went full Redditard. We must expel the liberalism within us.
All profit is psychic profit. Every human action is a rational act to make their situation better, as the individual perceives it in that moment according to his subjective ordinal values. You're stuck in a framework of pure material hedonism, which is the foundation of the current regime's political formula.
Our relationships with other people is what defines us, sanctifies us, and uplifts us. To deny such is to degrade humanity to mere mechanistic cogs. In such a hell of man's own making, husks of once-men may be shuffled about from pod to pod by the great bureaucracy.
I have to ask now: do you trust your own emotions? I don't mean as a guiding beacon for making decisions, either. What you just said implies that you can't ever trust that your emotions are anything but illusions and trickery.
If you want to ignore/discard your emotions, that's your right, of course. But "sunken cost fallacy" applies outside of emotions as well, and I don't want to see people crippled by self-doubt.
You're doubling down.
It's not about what you think.
You stated that no man on Earth could testify as to gaining value from their marriage.
That is obviously retarded.
Gaining tangible value. As in something that exists and can be quantified.
This is what Spengler was talking about. You went full Redditard. We must expel the liberalism within us.
All profit is psychic profit. Every human action is a rational act to make their situation better, as the individual perceives it in that moment according to his subjective ordinal values. You're stuck in a framework of pure material hedonism, which is the foundation of the current regime's political formula.
Our relationships with other people is what defines us, sanctifies us, and uplifts us. To deny such is to degrade humanity to mere mechanistic cogs. In such a hell of man's own making, husks of once-men may be shuffled about from pod to pod by the great bureaucracy.
You're making a distinction where there is none.
Emotional gain is subjective and can be influenced by the sunk cost fallacy.
You're tripling down on bullshit, man.
I ask again:
Are you serious with this line of argument?
I have to ask now: do you trust your own emotions? I don't mean as a guiding beacon for making decisions, either. What you just said implies that you can't ever trust that your emotions are anything but illusions and trickery.
If you want to ignore/discard your emotions, that's your right, of course. But "sunken cost fallacy" applies outside of emotions as well, and I don't want to see people crippled by self-doubt.