I agree, which is why I brought up Bari Weiss doing that.

That clip of Bari Weiss talking about the plight of Jews all the time is all you need to know about her.

Funny how Mongolia is actually extremely proud of Genghis Khan.

stfu retard

He had to mace the next black person who got close to him.

Y

But we're just anti-Israel because we're mindless Nazis, right? Whoever the sludge is on these boards that always says that, go eat shit.

We don't even need to do that, though. Free speech only for people who are pro-free speech. Zero hypocrisy in that.

What was that about gutting all DEI offices in colleges and universities but appointing anti-semitism officers to each of them?

Okay, but who is it? If real, this person posted it and intentionally tied it to their name. Or is it fake?

Holy fuck that's lame.

Is it a crime? I thought it was a tort and falls under battery. It's very possible it's both.

"If you think Charlie Kirk deserved to be murdered for his opinions, you can't have a problem with only losing your job for yours."

James Lindsay has been extremely disappointing for the past year. I used to agree with him on 80% of things, and now it seems like 0%.

They have alternatives. Words are violence, after all. Pornography is just a good vector because a lot of right-wingers oppose it.

Agree that's a potential concern. I commented with that question copied.

Understood, I hear you.

By the way, Tony made a good point (copied here): "Isn't he worried that this 'friend' of his will connect his username with his real identity?"

Something to think about.

You said his account is associated with porn and you haven't described him as the most resilient. I can see a perceived privacy issue even if he wasn't weak-willed. It also sounds like there's some lingering level of hostility toward you, so even if he didn't feel like his privacy was invaded he may still use that as an excuse to one-up you.

I'm not sure what you want. You said in your post you think you can wash your hands of this person, and I think for your own well-being you're probably right. So "us" reaching out to him comes across as a contradiction... we're not your personal army, brother, and posters here speaking to him because you want them to is not washing your hands. I think I understand why you sympathise with him, but he comes across as a leftist in a tailspin still clutching at "owning the chuds." Unfortunately, it sounds like he thinks you're one of them.

Edit: I also want to add that any Reddit posts that would bring up mending old relationships out of the blue would come across as extremely transparent. I think a lot of people would be pretty suspicious of the timing. I feel for you, man.

Discussing his Reddit account might make him defensive or feel like his privacy has been violated somehow.

He's using blocking /ghosting you to feel better about himself.

Shouldn't be by firing squad. Deny him the glory and deny the left the hypocrisy argument. Give him lethal injection like every other forgettable murderer.

He didn't say they were necessary, he said they were inevitable, that they're going to happen. He did not say they were required to happen. If you want to play at being pedantic, at least be correct.

Did Charlie Kirk say he supported murder? Yes or no.

Best I can do is a black armed robbery convict who died of fentanyl.

Update the intersectional stack variables. Black > female + Ukrainian + refugee.