6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Surely, they can't be this retarded?

My yardstick for human stupidity is the time someone killed over two hundred people by lighting a cigarette while stealing petrol from a crashed tanker truck. So yes, they can be this retarded.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got twenty seconds in, to where nutjob is admitting their delusion is going to get them all killed.

I'm not going to watch the rest of it, which I'm sure is everyone affirming nutjob and telling him he's a real girl.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not necessarily more efficient - a boolean is probably going to be padded to a full word, the same as the integer representing the various enum values.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +5 / -1

I associate the style with brain surgery. It goes well with cyberpunk since it combines the punk aesthetic with the needs of neuroware, but in real life it's not that cool.

-1
Grumman -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's clearly false. There are a lot of people who are only anti-war because one of our enemies is losing.

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The left's presentation of the paradox of tolerance is a lie. They would tell you they are intolerant of the intolerant, when they are actually intolerant of the intolerant of the intolerant. They defend the enemies who fired the first shot.

9
Grumman 9 points ago +9 / -0

which is about as dumb as (if not dumber than) pirates who don't touch another pirate's treasure.

That's easy to justify with a single word: hatred. Someone who turns to piracy because they hate the Spanish might not be interested in attacking anyone else, even if they aren't explicitly sanctioned as privateers by Spain's enemies.

17
Grumman 17 points ago +17 / -0

In the hands of a non-leftist, this premise would be fine. A conflict between an adventurer-archaeologist and an outsider who thinks he's no better than a common thief and grave robber is good. But theirs has the stink of leftist writing all over it, so it sucks.

13
Grumman 13 points ago +14 / -1

He didn't coin the term "anti-theist" - Christopher Hitchens was calling himself that twenty years ago.

19
Grumman 19 points ago +19 / -0

Because that's what Islam is. You cannot denounce slavery and child rape without denouncing Muhammad himself.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

To give Concord a bit of credit, that's an ugly recolour of one of their better-looking characters. They did have 3-4 characters that looked fine.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

To people who say this, I say: install an ad blocker. You're not supporting them by using their bandwidth for your own purposes.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does he? The only thing of his I've seen was his debate with Destiny regarding the Ukraine-Russia War, and I thought he did a terrible job of arguing my side.

8
Grumman 8 points ago +8 / -0

Because a transsexual detransitioning means the kill switch didn't go off. The whole point is to get these people irreversibly hooked on postmodernist nonsense; they're not supposed to get better.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to oppose abortion long ago. Now I'm like: "Please leftists! Go get abortions! The more the merrier! Sterilize your children that somehow get born? So cool! That's sticking it to the patriarchy, you go grrl!" & etc.

I'm still of the opposite opinion. Convincing leftists to murder their own children is one of the tools the left uses to turn them into fanatics.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if their motives were not so iconoclastic, time resists such standardisation. The year, the lunar month and the day aren't whole number multiples of one another, let alone multiples that be neatly divided into weeks and seasons, so it's inevitably either going to be a mess or fall out of sync with reality.

29
Grumman 29 points ago +29 / -0

Apparently the squirrel was killed because it bit one of the DEC employees, and you can't test a live squirrel for rabies. Which still says they're fucking incompetent - I've caught feral rats and mice by hand, and I've never given them the opportunity to bite me.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +4 / -1

You fools, you're supposed to keep him quiet until after the release date!

35
Grumman 35 points ago +36 / -1

I don't believe them. If you're going to do that, you specifically do not want to use randomly generated results. Send everyone results of a 69,420-69,420 tie instead, so there's no way that they can be mistaken for a genuine result.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because they don't kill themselves because they go crazy, they kill themselves because they go sane.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've said it before, but there are interesting things you can do with pronouns in speculative fiction that cannot be done while this utter nonsense is sucking up all the air in the room. You can't have an ambassador who uses the royal we because he's the political avatar of his people when these retards will just interpret it as "OMG he's nonbinary!" and shout down everyone who disagrees.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

This reminds me of something I read on the blog A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry, which was the simple observation that medieval people believed their religions, whereas George Martin writes a world that has the trappings of being medieval, but lets the villains perform un-medieval blasphemies without being brought to heel by the vengeful pious. Calling an all-father deity a transvestite should be highly offensive to all around at best, if not cause to step backwards out of the splash zone.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their only comeback so far has been to accuse the entire Republican party and/or all Trump voters of being moon landing deniers.

We know who wants to tear down every single achievement of Western civilisation, and it's not the Republicans.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›