22
Gizortnik 22 points ago +22 / -0

That's intentional because of exactly this.

They want you to treat it as a Machine God, when it's really just a retarded series of algorithms that have been told what answers to give, regardless of input, meaning it's not even the I in it's name.

Or, sometimes, it's literally just 500 Indian dudes.

Motherfuckers trying to play us like the Wizard of Oz.

-7
Gizortnik -7 points ago +2 / -9

Nothing I said was 'tough'. So, I'm not sure where you got that from.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +10 / -3

The cops probably know who she is, and who called them, and they've been looking for an excuse to do this to her because [insert retarded, petty, bullshit where someone slept with someone else]

-2
Gizortnik -2 points ago +2 / -4

Okay, so I teach my kid how to Conceal Carry.

What's the problem?

12
Gizortnik 12 points ago +12 / -0

Calvin & Hobbes was clearly Paleo-Conservative, Alt-Right, Child Endangerment

18
Gizortnik 18 points ago +21 / -3

Does anyone get the impression the reason they are pursuing this is to undermine parents who trust their kids to act more independently?

The prosecutor said they'll drop the charges so long as the 10 year old installs a GPS tracker on his phone so that the state can monitor his movements, so yes.

The government when they find out Gen X'ers are allowing kids to drink from garden hoses like they did back in the day.

8
Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

The only difference is that the nuance of the payments is even more crazy.

Trump NEVER ordered any of these payments.

The man who sent Cohen the checks was the Trump organization's Controller. He received a whiny email from Cohen demanding to be paid more money because he didn't think the amount he was getting was fair for the legal services he was providing. He never mentioned Stormy Daniels or anything. He also refused to provide invoices for any of these 'legal services' he was doing that he wouldn't talk about. The Controller told him that he couldn't just "give him more money", especially without an invoice. So, after ranting in his email like a little bitch, the Controller came up with a solution: could advance his contractually required payments forward until Cohen renegotiated his contract. Cohen bitterly agreed. So, the Controller modified his payments and selected an option from the dropdown menu of his accounting software that he thought best matched the description of these requests: Legal Expenses.

The Controller NEVER SPOKE TO TRUMP ABOUT THIS ACTION. He did it off of his own volition because Cohen was upset, and he was going to get this money anyway. Nothing the Controller did was a violation of the law, and you'll notice he was never charged in a conspiracy. Cohen claimed that Trump told him he would order the Controller to make these payments, but there's no evidence of it, and the Controller said he basically never talked to Trump outside of a few random occasions because DJT was never really in his management. The closest would have been Don Jr, who Cohen didn't claim was part of the conspiracy, and again, Don Jr wasn't notified in any part of this.

Yet, somehow, selecting Legal Expenses from the dropdown was a felony... For Trump Sr., but not the Controller. Even though the Controller expressly stated that he did all this because Cohen was complaining, and he was going to get the money anyway.

After all that, Cohen literally went into a bank and robbed the Trump organization of $60,000 which he was never authorized or entitled to remove. Read that again, COHEN COMITTED FELONY ROBBERY because he complained Trump wasn't paying him enough.

17
Gizortnik 17 points ago +18 / -1

Honestly, the EMT's weren't the ones that killed Floyd. He did that to himself.

This sounds more like the Eric Garner case. He laid on his back for too long because he was wildly obese, and he passed out from all the exertion, and the EMT's made no effort to try and revive him, or really even check on him for like 18 minutes or something crazy. Yet some how that was the cop's fault?

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like Hispanics voting for a border wall. For people who have immigrants competing for their jobs and bringing wages down, immigration is an economic issue. For people who benefit from cheap labor, it's also an economic issue. And I feel like most people know which side of this they're on.

You're 100% right from everything I can see. It's an economic issue, but it's effectively become a class issue. Donald Trump wasn't just winning blacks and hispanics, he was winning working class and rural voters from every demographic at a universal level. Where he would have only won black rural voters, he made major headways with urban working class voters.

Basically, it's a fight between the working, rural, and entrepreneurial classes; versus the middle managerial, elite, and dependent-slave classes. The divisions along racial lines are actually more irrelevant, and are more of a demonstration of how many of that demographic are actually in those classes.

When we observe the immigration is good for GDP yet still people think of it as an economic threat, this is because such GDP gains are far from evenly distributed. More people win than I think people realize. Not just robber barons but the people who consooom too.

GDP has always been fake and gay because it intentionally slam-fucks government spending into economic productivity, as if government waste is inherently productive. However, the data is being more and more bastardized, and the policy wonks are spending more time trying to play with numbers to make the line go up, rather than understand what the equation actually means. This is why Britain keeps importing a quadrillion Bahamalians every year. They're hoping infinity migrants makes the calculation work. Rather than even having a passing understanding of what the variables are even supposed to represent.

People are already well aware that the Stock Market is not the economy on it's own, and now it's becoming clear that GDP also isn't the economy. Worse, that's only if you assume that the government's calculations of the GDP are legitimate, which their not. Meaning that the government and the economists literally can't be trusted to monitor the economy, let alone regulate it. Instead, the Americans are learning to trust themselves, which is killing the power of the media's terroristic gaslighting.

-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +4 / -5

Try the Brave browser instead.

And stop using your enemy's software!

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's how they were describing it as a universal element, not one condition among many. They didn't say "immigration, mismanagement, corruption, and inflation". They just said, "Welp. It's just inflation. And nobody knows where that comes from but it's just an unknowable force in history that we'll have to weather the storm of."

-9
Gizortnik -9 points ago +2 / -11

Sit down, faggot. My opposition to the AIPAC has long been well documented. Just because your cognitive dissonance doesn't allow you to think outside of your meta-narrative, it doesn't mean I have to abide by it.

32
Gizortnik 32 points ago +32 / -0

Actual Justice Warrior continues to cover the Daniel Penny case as it proceeds, and just like with other high-profile anti-white cases, the media is running interference on behalf of the state, and trying to poison the well of the general public. However, beyond granting immunity to the non-white latino individual who "assisted" Penny in restraining Mr. Neely (which indicates an incredible racial bias since that witness should be charged with the same level of battery and murder as Mr. Penny), the prosecution also brought the Medical Examiner onto the stand.

The ME explicitly stated that Mr. Neely had some sort of "low-oxygen environment" in his body at the time of his death. She had sent out a tox screen to see what kind of drugs may have been in his system, but explicitly delayed making a ruling on the cause of death because she didn't have evidence to suggest what the cause of death was.

Then, at some point, she watched the video of Mr. Neely & Mr. Penny's conflagration, and THEN AND ONLY THEN did she determine the cause of death, presumably on her couch watching TV. So, she declared that asphyxia was the cause of Mr. Neely's death, not because of strangulation makes, not because of exploding blood vessels in the neck and brain, not because of the toxicology results, but because of the media.

...

No rule 2, but you don't hate journalists enough.

Also, please note that the NYPD and EMT's failed to do any helpful medical actions to improve the oxygen level in Mr. Neely's brain, well over 40 minutes after Mr. Penny had already left.

So, once again, the EMT's failed to provide life-saving care, so the government and the media work together to lynch a white guy.

-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +1 / -2

Bitcoin as a long-term asset, yes. But it's a hard proposition to ask people to watch the purchasing power of their savings account decrease by 30% every year or so.

Additionally, not many places still use Bitcoin for purchases. Look, I like gold and silver too, but I don't know anywhere I can give that out to buy a sandwich.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

"winning" is carrying a hell of a lot of weight at that moment.

it took quite some time for the Syrian Army to start properly winning.

I'm not saying he did or he didn't, I don't really know, I'm just glad he worked with Russia to destroy his weapon stockpile so that it couldn't a) be used, or b) be taken and used by someone else.

Besides. Small amounts of chemical weapons have been used in wars when it looks like no one is looking, and there is a particularly hard defensive nut to crack.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's a con man, but he knows where bodies are buried. I'd say that if his intel is good, he could be worth it.

-5
Gizortnik -5 points ago +1 / -6

Yes. The Federal Reserve and the US Government is extremely close to the point that it is effectively a federal agency. Moreover, under the National Socialists, the Reichsbank was explicitly under the control of the party.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +5 / -4

There is no justification for them not registering as foreign agents.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›