You keep pretending that I'm your meta-narrative, and that's why you're wrong. Your meta-narrative is false.
And it's not true that the other country's have that definition. The FIVE EYES basically shows the dominance of the American hegemony. It's not so much that they share with us as it is intel we take from them. The other states are vassals.
Now, Canada and the UK shouldn't be our vassals, but Israel is simply too independent and uncooperative to be a vassal, let alone a staunch ally.
Dangerously wrong.
You have to explicitly say: "I want a lawyer". In those exact words.
If you say, "I want a lawyer, dawg." The police will literally claim you didn't invoke your right to counsel because Lawyer-Dogs aren't a thing, and therefore it's not possible for anyone to understand what you said.
Because they claim that I'm a secret jewish zionist subverter.
They can't accept that someone who disagrees with them is an American, is an anti-theist, and is a Libertarian. Whites can't support Israel, Judaism, or Zionism without being jews or hypnotized by jews. Whites also can't legitimately oppose or critique Israel, Judaism, or Zionism without being a National Socialist.
This is because they need recruits, so they push a false dichotomy. They also don't really want to complain to much about Islamist and Jihadi child-rape of their race members because they hate jews more than they love their daughters.
In reality, I oppose Zionism because it's Progressive Nationalism. Or effectively, the progressives bastardized Judaism into a race, and then wanted race communism with jews. Or... National Socialism. So into the trash it goes. I oppose Judaism because Protestant Christianity is genuinely superior as a moral framework in dealing with Truth and responsibility. Also, circumcision? Nah, bro. Finally, Israel is Israel First. If you don't accept that, they will screw you over and they've done it before. I don't think it's worth trying to keep them on a short leash when we could be having better relationships to the Anglosphere and South America. Just let them handle themselves, they don't need our help. It's not a Liberal country, and it's not a Western country.
Is it possible for an Anglo to have American loyalties? They're clearly of a foreign ethnicity.
As a matter of fact, the Brits are quite annoyed about Biden because they believe his Irish ethnicity makes him anti-British. So, as an Irishman is he capable of American loyalties?
As for Israel's government. Of course they are going to try and gain influence over the US. It's the same reason Qatar influences the American government as well.
Correct, it's bullshit. Again, France is a much better ally, and their intelligence was always conditional. It's as if we should strictly regulate Israeli influence in the US or something. Currently, the only people not allowed to have unfettered influence in the US is the Russian Federation.
Israel wouldn't have known anything about 9/11, because they were never the target. The CIA, NSA, and FBI did know, and only the NSA actually tried to do anything to bring it to people's attention.
As for intelligence sharing, there's a good god damned reason they are not in the FIVE EYES. And it's because they put their interest over ours.
That's all fine and dandy from a philosophical perspective. But that's not even where we are at. We're still at the Left asserting that it's not possible for a migrant to be a criminal. We're not operating in reality yet, because the Left is too busy asserting what they want to be true, rather than what is.
It's more that they underestimated how cunning Alex is/was.
The Supplement Company that is bidding on InfoWars is run by Alex's dad. That same company also is the majority debtor for InfoWars. That means that even in Bankruptcy, that is the company that has to be paid first. It is the same company that just filed a complaint against The Onion's bid at auction. That is why the persecutors colluded with The Onion in the first place. If they hadn't have done that, InfoWars would just be owned by Alex's dad.
The cases are in the process of being appealed, but due to (what I would consider) arcane legal procedure, the sales have to go through before the appeal process can properly begin.
Which means we go back to a "you can't un-rape the dog" scenario. It is very likely that the CT case will not be reversed on appeal even though it's an illegal case, because of the insane partisanship of both the appellate court and the State Supreme Court, meaning a run at SCOTUS would be the only possible answer there. The appellate court in Texas is also bad, but the Texas Supreme Court might be better. Either way: the damages done by the courts, prosecutions, and judges is likely permanent even if he wins an appeal, which simply restarts the proceedings against him and they keep trying to make him kill himself.
Even complaints to the Bar Association won't work because most State Bar Associations are Leftist terror organizations at this point. They are hyperpartisan and pushing Leftism hard, they've been doing it for years.
The only way this stops this is something like what we saw with Fanni Willis where the case was so bad that the Appellate Court looked like they were about to sanction the government attorneys. Except in this case, it can't be a maybe. It needs to be heavy sanctions and a recommendation to their state disciplinary council.
No, they're doubling down because a Gaetz DOJ appointment is going to lead to multiple convictions.
Oh, it just got better. The news media just leaked the contents of the ethics investigation from "a hacker". Weird how this hacker isn't a Russian spy like Wikileaks apparently was, but whatever.
You see, I was under the impression that the DOJ's initial investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old" was the House ethics investigation into the DOJ's investigation of "sex trafficking a 17 year old"... _BUT APPARENTLY THOSE ARE DIFFERENT.
So, the initial "sex trafficking a 17 year old" charge must have been dropped, but then, for some unknowable reason, the DOJ started investigating the exact same charge for completely different circumstances. Instead of allegedly having consensual sex on a plane while crossing state lines with a 17 year old who denies the charges; there was apparently another 17 year old that Gaetz allegedly had sex with at Epstien/Diddy like parties that allegedly he set up. This is obvious projection.
The DOJ failed to blackmail his father to use as a weapon against him, and as a result they made up the charge of "Sex Trafficking" and have been spending several years desperately trying to create the conditions for that charge to exist.
Gender inequality:
Singing about how the English will carry your corpse as a man through the hills and cities of Northern England and Scotland as a reminder why you should never rebel, while your widow takes the low roads through the valleys and woods back home to avoid capture and rape. Yes, there is some inequality there.