Sar.keesian originally tried critisizing more mainstream shows. She put up her videos, no one cared.
It was when she started targetting nerds for some reason loved embracing the "womenz don't like me" message that it gained influence.
Honestly we didn't really realize the dangers of these sites.
We just thought - a bunch of people with interests would get together and talk about stuff.
We didn't really realize that the interesting people would get bored and move on to other things, while the pathological nutjobs you don't even know exist because you wouldn't let them into your house any social group kicks them out - would slowly work themselves into running the place.
Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which the abuser attempts to sow self-doubt and confusion in their victim's mind. Typically, gaslighters are seeking to gain power and control over the other person, by distorting reality and forcing them to question their own judgment and intuition.
Every election they claim they're going to move away if they lose. And if they lose they mysteriously forget about it and are still here.
The idea that this group who mutilated themselves to look like the other gender, and want to convince others to do the same, are going to be welcomed elsewhere is particularly fictional.
Native tribes were engaged in warfare, occassional butchering of other tribes, etc, just like white/black/asian/etc peoples were when their ancestors lived in tribes.
Some native tribes were delighted for white people to show up and provide them with weapons to destroy their neighbors who they had been in endless warfare with. Which the same thing those europeans ancestors had been doing themselves a few hundred or thousand years before that.
Both the "trans" people I knew were very clearly manipulated or bullied towards it by women. One his mother, the other his college girlfriend.
I think this is missing a big category.
Women turning their kids into perpetual helpless toddlers has been a pathological issue for a long time.
I mean...I've had friends that get married, and "mysteriously" they start belittling their male friends until their male friends stop hanging out with them.
Have you ever seen a woman move in, and other people living their aren't slowly pushed out?
Only top 0.1% gigagchads get anything close.
I actually don't think this is correct, this is men applying their understanding of the system.
Gigachad - by definition - doesn't care about these emotions. Women apply these emotions when it's in her best interests to keep the man around.
She finds out she's pregnant and suddenly gigachads completely dismissal of these emotions is terrifying rather that attractive.
She finds herself being attacked and abused by another group of men in the tribe, or from another tribe - who will save her? Men are the fighters.
She's uses towards her kids as well, to keep her kids emotionally attached to her so she's taken care of in old age.
These emotions are also used among women towards each other but that's a different subject.
They've replaced every elements that causes her to push beta emotions which turns women into sociopaths.
- she no longer needs to keep a husband around because her career is her husband - so she moves out if her chad-chasing phase
- with social media she no longer uses beta emotions to for social bonds with friends
- she continues to try to attach her kids to her strongly enough they won't leave - but they're no longer going to support her into old age so she's no longer incentivized to insist they be successful - so you end up with just the sabotage into being independent stuff, where she so thoroughly dominates them into dependence they cut off their genitals and disfigure themselves to ensure her children be be so disfigured and unnappealing to anyone else they'll be perpetual dependent toddlers who can never leave her.
Chad doesn't get the blue pill fantasy, he's defined by his inability to be influenced by blue pill stuff. But the incentives for women to play the blue pill fantasy for their own benefit get removed so they're no longer doing it except for sabotaging their own children into being to dependent to ever leave.
Their are actually issues with men in this regard as well, the same dynamics where mens incentives to make their children successful being removed have issues, but you just don't see a lot of that any more.
If you look at who's actually incels nowadays it seems like it's 50%+ normal guys who are just to timid with women - their mothers pour on boue pill to trap them a little to much, their female peers have to little self-interest in capturing one of them long term.
This same stupid bitch was depressed when she had a son, because she "brought another white man into the world".
I can't imagine why her white boyfriend would break up with her.
I mean, on some level she is technically correct then.
The kind of woman who says white men are scum, then dates a series of white men, I mean...what kind of dude dates a woman who publicly states how she despises everything about him.
Sociopaths. Narcissists. She's an object that attracts the exact thing she's complaining about.
They were underage in 1968, and perhaps the law did not allow them to sue in 1978. Now it does.
They were pushing a political narrative that having sex before 25 should cause you to be arrested and jailed because "something something brain development".
Has anyone started to notice that that keep raising the age over and over and over again?
Like I understand that people would be nervous about the old guy who wants the high school girls to come over and sleep with him. But they're missing that if you put the eldery women in charge, the results are much worse. They'd lock the teen girls indoors and never let them talk to another human being, just so their ego doesn't have to feel bad that they'll never be young again.
Every time it's the same thing.
- when I was a young girl I did (sexual thing) and that made me successful!
- now I'm older and can would no longer be able to do those things
- so younger girls shouldn't be able to do (thing that made me successful)! either!
Successful societies have had men who admire attractive women in charge for...forever, basically. There's a lot of whining about it but honestly we know it works.
What happens to a society when it's politically dominated by narcissistic, older childless women? Does it just collapse as they seek to steal every scrap of attention from their younger counterparts?
Lol what would you say if someone told you that you could claim someone who's dead:
The suit alleges that Zeffirelli — who died in 2019 — assured both actors that there would be no nudity in the film, and that they would wear flesh-colored undergarments in the bedroom scene. But in the final days of filming, the director allegedly implored them to perform in the nude with body makeup, “or the Picture would fail.”
Said certain things. And as a reward:
They are seeking damages “believed to be in excess of $500 million.”
For $500 million?? My real life self would absolutely tesify in court the Angela Lansbury forced me to show my bare buttocks on film for so much money I'd be able to own a home on every continent and "fuck you" levels of money.
I don't think any of this is true, they're simply redoing the same teenage sex hysteria narratives my grandparents had in modern form.
I don't really think we're doing our children favors by reverting to a "babies are brought by storks" mentality here.
They only started changing the age of "minors" 100 years ago.
Human beings have been around for 250,000 years.
The age wasn't change because of morality, or protecting anyone, etc. It was changed because of economics - economists said that the later people put off having children (or not having children at all) the more money they created for the economy.
So now they give priority to the voice of narcissistic elderly women who - if left in charge - wouldn't let anyone fall in love, get married, or have sex ever. You slowly watch the stranglehold on your kids as fewer kids get married, or have kids of their own, and they're more depressed than ever.
It's bizarre to watch people so easily manipulated into a system where they're so hardcore engaged in making sure their own kids will be the end of the line and simply replaced in the future with people from other countries.
It is kind of a dilema isn't it?
On the one hand that's all kind of evil. On the other hand...who would have had the highest influence in making him into this evil person?
"trans" is very much women's pathological evil. The desire to force your kids into being children who can never leave you forever by surgically removing their adult parts. The desire to gain attention medically destroying your children. The desire to dominate your children so heavily they engage in massive self-harm to try to get you to let up and stock attacking them.
I've known 2 "trans" people and they both very clearly pushed/bullied into it by women.
A woman who allegedly had a sexual relationship with Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler when she was a teen in the 1970s has filed a lawsuit
1970 was 50 years ago. She's be at least 55 now.
When she's a teen she uses her sexuality to get resources (money) and attention.
When she's elderly - she must be at least 60 now - she does exactly the same thing. Uses her sexuality (via madeup accussations) to get reources (money) and attention.
I've heard this described as the older generation stealing from the younger generation. In exchange for a few moments of attention ego and a little cash, they throw entire sexuality of the next generation under the bus. The next generation of women and men become unable to function normally as the "I'm to old to want to have sex any more" generation imposes their current reality on everyone else.
I think these are actually dark humor, the big flaw is that anyone takes them seriously.
men: bad because violent aggressive creatures
men: bad because sexuality
Women: what would you do if men disappeared?
women: immediately bring in new more violent less civilized aggressive creatures
women: immediately start flaunting my sexuality
I think these are actually dark humor, the big flaw is that anyone takes them seriously.
men: bad because violent aggressive creatures
men: bad because sexuality
Women: what would you do if men disappeared?
women: immediately bring in new more violent less civilized aggressive creatures
women: immediately start flaunting my sexuality
If all the men were killed off tomorrow, what would you do?
I'd walk my dog at night! Braless!
Ok now your other female neighbors are doing the same thing. Her dog attacks and kills your dog. Then attacks you.
Well I'm calling the police!
Police no longer exist because there's no men.
I'm at least calling an ambulance.
Plenty of women do work as paramedics, so they take you to the hospital. However without men there's no surgeons so you'll bleed out or never walk again.
(Women start shooting other women walking around the neighborhood with dogs, and building 12 foot high walls around their houses to keep animals and other women out).
This is what you get in a world without men guys.
"Trans people” have rights but you don’t have the right to punish people for acknowledging objective reality
I don't agree at all, these are cultists who's end goal is convincing you to cut off your genitals and castrate yourself.
Do cocaine dealers have rights? I mean you have the right to a defense against being accused of dealing cocaine at school - you don't have the right to demand that the school put up pro-coaine signs and set up a cocaine dealing station.
It's literally their job to lie convincingly for a living.
And their job is to do it based on someone else's script.