Aggressive guy who picks fights everywhere he goes, doesn't take shit from anyone, takes what he wants (from others) when he wants, and acts like he's the center of the universe appeals to the primitive monkey brain part of women. A part of them still instinctively operates like they're living in the jungle, where cowering behind (and spreading her legs for) the biggest, most violent, and most sociopathic beast in the region was the best way for her to enjoy security and comfort with minimal effort. Those instincts are still very much in place in women, which is why they tingle so hard from thugs like this who scream and shout like apes.
When you're a desperate, horny virgin (or stuck in an unfulfilling marriage with a wife who for some reason hasn't been "in the mood" for years), you'll probably take whatever easy satisfaction you can get.
Here's another one: down the wrist or across it?
It's official: Canada officially cares more about jeets than its national past time and number one export.
Canada is not Canada anymore.
And will lose both.
TotalBiscuit in a nutshell.
Oh lawd, he a good boi, never hurt nobody!
"I love my fruit..."
Strawberry-flavored candy, soda, ice cream, and icing is NOT fruit.
"Note to self: poop does not make good adhesive for tower."
"You know you cannot read. Scribbling on paper with poop is useless."
That motorcycle was a NAZI!
Looks cool. I'll keep an eye on this.
No. Please. Don't. Anything but the AI data center.
My mistake. Though even Reddit would too.
Of course Reddit would celebrate a mass murderer.
Makes Kratos the perfect spokesman for them.
It should be noted that they hired an actual tranny they-them degenerate to play the character (Bobbi Salvör Menuez). Which says to me the producers of Landman fully intend its character to be likable and sympathetic. No way in hell would a tranny willingly preach against itself. Plus, if shows they believe that only a genuine tranny could properly portray a tranny character (while at the same time, having zero issues with a 33-year-old playing a college student).
Funny how they have no problems with people bussing across multiple state lines to burn, loot, and murder in cities they've never set foot in before.
Two seasons. Which in today's climate, is actually the rough equivalent of one season from back in the day (when X-Files was actually a thing) that's split in two, and was only produced that way to give the illusion that the studio has an efficient production schedule and isn't going to just produce half-seasons from that point on on the off-chance that the show ACTUALLY does well.
The girl would be killed by her rapists for the crime of being both an infidel and a whore (because she got raped). Basically cutting out the middle man.
-he has experience in connections in the film industry, and is generally liked by Hollywood
That's not a good thing at all. It means he's one of them.
Colbert is most definitely one of those "huge fans" of Tolkien. And as a "huge fan," he believes it is necessary to "criticize the things you love." And in that, he is going to say that Tolkien "was a straight white Christian man of his time" and that he wrote and believed in things that "wouldn't fit well with modern audiences today." And so he's going to address those things that are "problematic." Fix them if you will. Make his story and his world better, inclusive, and more "reflective of the world as it really is."
Yep. An entire generation has grown up seeing Final Fantasy as an ultra-linear, on-rails series of narrative games, not realizing the norm USED to involve traveling to dungeons and towns on a world map and eventually acquiring an airship to zip around it with impunity.
Shippers ruin everything.
For your first question, the answer is simple: Bethesda had no idea it would take forever for the next Elder Scrolls to come out. While they were working on post-release content for Skyrim, they figured they would release a new iteration within the next 5-7 years or so, alternating between it and Fallout like they had been doing. Bethesda had been amazingly efficient before. Morrowind was out in 2002, Oblivion in 2006, Fallout 3 in 2008(!), and Skyrim in 2011. So with all this in mind, they pretty much saw no reason to produce any more DLCs and that the teams behind them should focus on the next game (Fallout 4). Even back in the 2010s, singleplayer games had a limited shelf life and it was better to get cracking on a new project than to keep adding to an old one that gamers would by and large move on from within a year.
But obviously, things changed, both at Bethesda and in the industry as a whole. So many things that I don't think any one of them could be blamed individually. Bethesda started to get more greedy and sought more ways of squeezing blood out of the rock, starting with monetizing mods. They also learned that they could port Skyrim around to the newer, better consoles, and people would buy it. Heck, they could even re-release it on PC at almost full price and people would still buy it in droves just to get higher resolution textures. They could release a half-assed asset flip live-service game like Fallout 76 and still make a profit, even through a storm of controversy. And when a TES MMORPG was released, Bethesda likely realized they didn't need to make any more TES content for a good while because that one was filling the niche, would for years to come, and would generate a steady income. Which gave the company plenty of incentive to try something new, like a space game.
And this is all without taking into account what the suits were probably doing behind the scenes, especially once the studio changed hands from Zenimax to Microsoft.
For your second question, I imagine the devs were kicking around an idea to implement a settlement-building system into Skyrim, but ultimately deemed it too complex for a simple DLC and decided to instead fold it into Fallout 4.
I have no sympathy for adult female "victims" of abuse. Government and society has given women absolutely EVERY resource and outlet to escape their situation. They don't even need proof that they're being abused by whatever men they have in their lives; everyone will take them at their word, especially when the waterworks get cranked up. So if you have a genuine case where a woman is being abused and she is doing NOTHING about it...it's because she wants to be there. Any attempt to stop him or get her away WILL be met with resistance from her. To the point where there's very real danger where she will join her abuser in violently fighting her attempted saviors.
And when it's all done and he's carted off to jail or the morgue, she'll go running to the next shitbag she can find.