3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +4 / -1

You've constructed an argument I didn't make and hour response to it isn't even accurate.

2
DivvyDivet 2 points ago +6 / -4

Not really. Mathematically it's already happened. Regardless of the statistics the fact is that mathematically it's possible and it happened. You're argument is akin to looking at a rock and saying it could have taken all these other paths but it landed in this spot right here. The probability of this specific spot is huge. Well yeah but so what. If not this arrangement we wouldn't exist to examine it.

The mutations also aren't random. The set that works best for survival and reproduction is what gets selected. Pressure from the environment guides the process passively so that the remainder is the best fit for the current environment. Not being a random process greatly speeds up the changes and also makes your mathmatic probability argument irrelevant.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +6 / -3

Dogs are not from wolves, but from a common ancestor. And despite dogs showing by far the most mutability within the species, they have not yet jumped to another species among them via mutation.

Right this is exactly how the theory of evolution describes the process. Minor changes through time lead to big changes via pressure from the environment. You don't look exactly like your mom or dad or anyone in your family tree. Taken over millions of years and generations speciation happens. The famous fruit fly experiment was able to prove this by breeding two separate colonies of fly into two distinct species that could not interbreed.

It's also not lost on anyone that you ignored the other glaring examples I gave you.

If the theory of evolution was true, and by the way pointing to a provable law of physics to try and lend weight to an unproven theory of speciation doesn't hold water, then we'd actually have a concrete example of evolution somewhere in the fossil record and we just don't.

I wasn't actually pointing to the theory of gravity. I was pointing to the wording and how the science community uses theory as the highest level of any hypothesis.

As I pointed out speciation has been proven through multiple facets including the fruit fly experiment.

We do have examples of speciation through fossil records. Tons! When we travel the ancestry tree through life we can find links in the timeline left in rock sediments. Never once have we found a link in the chain in the wrong position in time. In addition the Tictalac species and fossils were found due to scientist's want to prove that whales evolved from hippo like creatures and guess what they found the intermediate species right where it should be in the timeline in the fossil. Evolution has biology, chemistry, and archaeology all supporting the claim. Not the science community. The data. This is all easy to find.

As an example that actually fits within the subject, supposedly humans, Homo Sapiens Sapien, evolved from a common ancestor to chimpanzees.

Yes

But we have millions, literally millions of genetic variances from chimps. So explain them. Explain to me the rate of mutation within the supposed evolutionary timeframe, and explain to me where the species jump is between them.

The genome project did just this. The change from chimp to bonobo to early human happened when the #2 and #3 chromosomes fused in the timeline. We have fossil records for tons of intermediate species between the bonobos and modern humans. This all exits.

5
DivvyDivet 5 points ago +8 / -3

-Dogs from wolves

-Broccoli, cauliflower, mustard all from the same non-eddible ancestor plant.

-Viruses that mutate every year

There is a liteny of proof to prove evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. The same as the theory of gravity explains the fact of gravity.

This isn't an argument. Evolution is a fact of life on Earth. Species change over time. There is mountains of evidence.

0
DivvyDivet 0 points ago +6 / -6

Homosexuality appears across most species with mammals having the highest occurrence of about 20%. Your statement is demonstrably false.

10
DivvyDivet 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just forge the birth certificate like they did for that other guy.

7
DivvyDivet 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not his AR-15. And after his "friend" tried to burn him for the DA he should just buy his own.

10
DivvyDivet 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'd have to pirate it because I'm not giving Activision my money.

6
DivvyDivet 6 points ago +6 / -0

If they want to make it real then the trans character should have a suicide meter. Random NPCs and players will make the meter go up by misgendering them. When the meter is full the character commits suicide and they have to start over.

5
DivvyDivet 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm pretty sure that an AR15 won't be found in a COD or wargame because the military uses M16. Come to think of it I can't recall every having an AR-15 in any shooter I've ever played.

26
DivvyDivet 26 points ago +26 / -0

Kyle's "friend" worked with the DA and testified against Kyle in what is an obvious quid pro quo to get a lesser charge via plea deal. Yeah officially that deal isn't on record but no lawyer is going to tell their client to incriminate themselves in a court without there being an upside to doing so.

Had this kid just shut up and stood with Kyle both would be walking on these bullshit charges.

14
DivvyDivet 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm not sure exactly when it started but participation trophies definitely lead to this.

22
DivvyDivet 22 points ago +22 / -0

That's exactly how commies are though. Rules for the Proletariat not for me.

8
DivvyDivet 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's only confusing if you accept liberal terms.

Pinhead is being played by a women who is pretending to be a man. See super easy.

20
DivvyDivet 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yup. Gave them a shot, but they became reddit 2.0 fast. Only without the money to support their bad ideas.

13
DivvyDivet 13 points ago +13 / -0

I bet if you got a random set of 100 US citizens with at least a high school diploma that 80+ would not have a basic understanding of the 10th amendment.

17
DivvyDivet 17 points ago +18 / -1

What kind of bullshit is this? He doesn't need a reason to refuse the vaccine, and she has no reason to control what he puts in his body. She is being unreasonable. There is no reasoning with anyone who thinks they can control your own body. Sorry OP but you're mom can get fuck off. There is no excuse for this kind of trespass.

7
DivvyDivet 7 points ago +7 / -0

The smut we must stop, the trash we must smash Laughter and fun must all be undone We must blame them and cause a fuss Before someone thinks of blaming us

Lyrics from the 1999 South Park movie. Mother's against Canda sing this song.

22 years and shit don't change.

3
DivvyDivet 3 points ago +3 / -0

The decision whether or not to get vaccinated is central to a person's life, to their well-being and dignity...

When the government controls that decision for people, they are being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for their own choices.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›