4
CaptPenguin 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was about 2%. There were 46K in the trial. This page just shows the adverse events.

18
CaptPenguin 18 points ago +18 / -0

It was 42000/46000 (91%) adverse events for the trial that lasted one, maybe two, months.

3
CaptPenguin 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is another management theory, called Theory X/Theory Y. In summary, if one treats their personnel like children they act like children.

I am not claiming that is what is happening here. But it is interesting to observe both their childish race/gender objections while also claiming they are being unfairly treated like children.

3
CaptPenguin 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is this concept in management called situational leadership. Not all employees need the same amount of direction. They all exist on a spectrum of ability and willingness.

As a manager, one does not need spend a lot of effort directing high skilled and willing employees. That effort is better spent guiding willing employees that lack the ability, or finding some way to motivate able employees that are unwilling to do work.

11
CaptPenguin 11 points ago +11 / -0

I haven't seen one entity/org./person claiming that Joe Rogan is spreading misinformation and then identifying the false statements that he is allegedly spreading. What information is he spreading that is false? Who is keeping you from rebutting his false information?

10
CaptPenguin 10 points ago +10 / -0

In a late phase of tinkering with his mythology, Tolkien wrote in The Silmarillion of Middle-Earth having a Creator deity (‘Eru Ilúvatar’ or ‘The One’), and lower spirits called ‘Valar’. This doesn’t exactly scream ‘Christianity’ to me.

The article author is actually retarded.

Seriously, how stupid does one have to be to write these sentences and not realize it is analogous to God and angels?

-1
CaptPenguin -1 points ago +1 / -2

I can agree with someone, in this case Archive.org, on principal that censorship is bad.

I don't have to have exactly the same imagined set of fears and concerns they have outlined to find some common ground with them.

I don't like the big tech leftist censorship we see today. I don't expect it playing out the way they have imagined. But maybe they don't need to give someone with my principles the hard sell. Maybe there are a lot more lefties that need to see how authoritarian censorship looks from another angle. So I kind of see this mockup as persuasive marketing, but you and I aren't the demographic they are trying to convince.

2
CaptPenguin 2 points ago +4 / -2

That isn't my take on this. It sounds like the Archive is wary of the direction the Internet censorship is heading. It seems to me they are warning against this political censorship, not encouraging it.

11
CaptPenguin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Cool, I won't be contributing to the prize pool by purchasing any compendium items this year.

1
CaptPenguin 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is shaking her head no. So she doesn't even believe her own lie.

Just from this little sound bite there is not a whole lot of context. She could be making a statement under duress, i.e. at gunpoint.

view more: ‹ Prev