by borga
10
Bullseyed 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why wouldn't making such false accusations result in immediate disbarment?

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd say I know fewer than 15 people who tested positive for COVID. But I don't go around asking, either.

3
Bullseyed 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm sure it is less than 1%, but we don't have data to support any answer, really.

For example, the 0.89% unvaccinated hospitalization rate they claim in that article would include people who got sick and hospitalized before they knew COVID was a thing, and the vaccinated rate would not.

The most at risk elderly who died all would fall into the unvaccinated group, because that all happened before the vaccine was released.

Either way, to calculate the actual rate you'd need to know numbers for how many people caught it, and that's un-knowable.

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd say "bad" Republicans are more likely to be good people trying their best who are dumb than intentionally evil like most Democrats.

And I don't see any problem with requiring immigrants to be vaccinated. Solves the problem in a few years that way.

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sort of. People are around chimps more than tigers. Can't really say which is "more dangerous" due to lack of data.

2
Bullseyed 2 points ago +2 / -0

By the New York Times | Source: Franklin Templeton-Gallup Economics of Recovery Study

Sounds made up either way.

6
Bullseyed 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not sure how doing anything besides directly answering the question isn't contempt of court. She should have been arrested on the spot, tbh.

3
Bullseyed 3 points ago +3 / -0

If we did, the world would be a better place today, though.

9
Bullseyed 9 points ago +9 / -0

Remember when the DNC did a mock President Trump beheading?

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point that this "doesn't prove them wrong" and is likely set up intentionally to push their agenda.

This study says "it isn't that hiring managers are sexist, but rather are victims of institutional sexism spanning generations".

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

This plays into their hand. Don't take this path.

They'll say "sure, women are less qualified because they haven't been given the same opportunities for the last 40 years to qualify for upper management positions".

view more: ‹ Prev