7
Aoikaze2000 7 points ago +7 / -0

You think it's the same type of person of "how do you know you won an argument with an athiest?" "you're banned from the forums"

9
Aoikaze2000 9 points ago +9 / -0

The tl;dr here is that Disney is going to (over the next several years) likely have to pay more in taxes because they decided to get political... while everything else stays roughly the same.

Disney can't just abandon the theme parks, so Florida has the high ground in these negotiations.

6
Aoikaze2000 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wouldn't that be stupid easy to steal by getting a truck (or similar big vehicle) to get in front of one and start drifting back towards it forcing it to slow down and brake... then just pin in the truck. I mean, it's like we could go all Mad Max on the down vehicle.. and there's little to nothing it can do once people are on it.

5
Aoikaze2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

All you need to do to let the Japanese understand you exactly is say this one magical phrase:

watashi wa baka gai jin desu ka

0
Aoikaze2000 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is a last name. Is there an actual connection there or just a last name?

-7
Aoikaze2000 -7 points ago +4 / -11

AFAIK they were white, and weren't Jewish. It's like, I get that it's easy to make the Jews your punching bag and the root cause for all problems, but if you don't actually have a solid reason and evidence to back that claim up, they're no different than any other group in history that hated another simply because they were part of that group.

13
Aoikaze2000 13 points ago +13 / -0

In this case... he's not wrong and he's got more spine than most of the US politicians.

11
Aoikaze2000 11 points ago +11 / -0

PR win from that would be worth the fight, especially since it would completely obliterate the NYT credibility to most of the normies.

6
Aoikaze2000 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think the point is to get them to perjure themselves, and have the courts take them out of the picture.

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno.... if she can work hard enough to get and own property, then she should be able to keep it.

Thing is, she's not going to marry any sluggard that crawls buy, so she's raising the bar on who she will consider. I mean, if you look at Proverbs 31 (NIV https://www.blueletterbible.org/niv/pro/31/1/s_659001 ), it describes a wife many men would kill to have... and yet... she's quite the industrious woman so I don't really think the prohibition of women owning property makes sense as it's forcing men to be better.

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you talking about commercial or residential?

6
Aoikaze2000 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mechanisms like these that allow for broken families need to end, as this is doing more societal damage than good.

4
Aoikaze2000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shouldn't that be something that would get you thrown out of the military? I mean, if they keep wanting to push that it's her body and all, she should keep her body in a condition to stay at the job she's been assigned.

10
Aoikaze2000 10 points ago +10 / -0

Never underestimate the power of a bored lawyer.