You're assuming previous arguments
No assumption, I scrolled up. Its right there.
But you can keep contorting around it, but the amount of times in just this reply that you've said me me me and crafted a victim narrative about yourself only helps the case of your egotistical syndrome.
Nothing. He is a man whose entire career and fame depends on his beliefs, ideas, and words. He has shown those to not only be worthless, but easily manipulated and used as a weapon for his ego before anything else.
To simply say "I was wrong, I'm sorry I let my fear get the best of me" and then do nothing else would show a genuine remorse for his actions and that he recognizes his failing as a prelude to actual growth. Instead he picks up a new war to start to repeat the same actions.
His current controversy shows that has he done no reflection, as his ego and desire to be the smartest guy in the room is still 100% at the control of this crusade.
You're inventing an argument for me
You invented a position for him, from just the label of "founding stock" and then got mad at him for daring to disagree with you. So once again, hypocrisy or projection is at play.
You have no consistency here. You are just yelling wildly to always be in disagreement with people and are happy to contradict yourself if it means being opposition to them. You are better than that, and we both know it.
It's pretty normal for people to tell me shit that's obviously false.
I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER I'M THE MAIN CHARACTER
Explains a lot about why you say things like "I feel the need to say something so you don't get away with saying it unopposed" if this is the kind of self centered ego you have.
Get over yourself hombre.
I don't believe in forgiveness or redemption without repentance. Repentance isn't as easy as "I changed my mind" and going for the other team, it needs genuine effort to make things right and suffer yourself as atonement for the suffering you created. Sitting in his rich mansion sipping coffee and screaming about a different topic is nothing of the sort.
Admitting to being wrong is step one of that, and he barely even is willing to do that and adds a dozen caveats to protect his ego. Because his ego is more important than the people who are fucking still dying.
What's funny is that in all the examples you listed, I can think of clear examples of "good guys doing bad things" that get called out for it and even "bad guys doing good things" and showing to be misguided and in need of help.
Shit that's the entire story of Pokemon Black and White (ironic naming), that bad guys use good and worthy ideas ideas to recruit naive people to help their evil plans and then discard them.
Which shows that even the guys who scream "media literacy" don't know shit about their own nonsense.
I'm not generally willing to say "oh let bygones be bygones, live and learn" when you threw your support directly onto the mass poisoning and possible death of tens of millions of people from it.
Its one thing to be naive and fall for it or even "trusted the science" and did it to offset the increasing consequences they pushed, its another to aggressively promote it while screaming at anyone who points out issues that may arise. And then never have the humility to admit being completely wrong afterwards when you try to change sides, especially if your response is "you were right but still you are fucking stupid" when forced to confront it.
Like, the vaxx wasn't some silly political policy that took a lot of steps before it created death and suffering. It was literally demanding people shoot something into their veins and letting the government force you to do it, that's not a "we all fuck up bro, you'll do better" position.
So the political alignment of a group of people historically is destiny, but then just above you say that Trump is gaining ground with minority groups who have for modern history been basically pure Left voting.
You are in such a rush to call people retarded and argue you aren't even holding a consistent stance. You are better than that.
It's always been weird to me that fascism is associated with nazis and not with the italians who invented it.
That's because people who discuss WW2 in such simplistic and accusatory tones don't actually know shit about it, and probably couldn't even name Italy as a major part of the Axis powers, if they even knew that name.
They just know nazi=bad and fascism=bad so nazi=fascist, and that's basically their entire belief system.
It was pre-trans madness, so people were much more offended by the extremely forced gay one and the ugly as sin tumblr elf.
The former is pretty much normalized now and the latter is still far worse than any tranny could hope to be.
"The Kamala Harris Fortnite map is more thoughtfully designed than you'd expect, and its huge."
Doesn't mention that its fun to play or does anything interesting. Just that they made it very big (not always a positive) and spent a long time designing it (without putting anything to do in it).
Its almost a perfect joke about them. All buzzwords and quantity, no thought given to logistics or making something people want.
Talking about Mexico is literally all Lopez has ever done. Its every joke, personality, and word out of his mouth. Nobody who invites him anywhere expects anything else.
What I find amusing about him, is that his "peak" was around the same time as Carlos Mencia. The guy who literally every single talking head spent every second whining about how awful he was (even South Park on the same network) but was legit helping racial harmony by making us all laugh at everyone at once, even if the humor was juvenile.
Which tells you a lot when Lopez, whose entire shtick has always been "we ain't going nowheres pendejo!!" is the one promoted and loved by the mainstream.
Every single survey is built in a specific way to get the answer they want to hear. One of the first things you learn about building one is how not to do that, which then means you know all the exact ways you can also do it.
Its why they are nearly always useless drivel meant to outrage bait or manipulate.
Like, its so fucking easy to get data that supports any possible end. Especially if you control for "outliers" which means you can just discard anything that doesn't fit the average or your expectations.
Regardless of how the election turns out, the entire campaign has shown and uplifted people enough to be openly Right-wing and not as easily shamed into silence about it. With a significant number being willing to break rank to do so.
So even if they "win" (legit or otherwise) they have still lost a significant amount of ground they once considered fully conquered.
Part of it is hybristophilia. They legitimately are super turned on by serial killers and criminals of all kinds, its pure porn to them. Talk to those girls and you'll find they have "favorites" that they are clearly infatuated with (one of the biggest podcasts for it is literally "My Favorite Murder"), and all the "I feel for the victims" is steeped in not looking bad and maintaining an image of progressivism (not shitting on hookers).
That's why its always serial killers are cults at the top, and not stuff like Bomb Collar or DC Sniper, because its a place where big strong men are taking what they want, manipulating people to their bidding, and generally being the Alphaest of Alpha males without a care about anyone else. If you look at which of those categories are the most "popular" after the pure media reasoning (biggest numbers, wildest story) its often the super attractive ones.
And all of that is because its literally "safe horny" for women. Its all the most fucked up fantasies they have sexually, being played out with plausible deniability (which is why they don't just watch fucking porn, people will judge them for it) and no actual danger to their wellbeing.
You wouldn’t see a dude taking over romance stories and making them more male focused so why do you think it works in guy brands?
There was a tweet some years ago I really like about this scenario involving a dude going like:
I've always loved Lifetime movies, I grew up watching them and they are so special to me. That's why I made one about this big titty girl shooting dinosaurs with lasers until they explode.
Which distills the entire "women writers" thing down to its basics.
As far back as the 1970s you see some female giants in science fiction and fantasy
For all the asterisks you need to put on the claim, Mary Shelley was one of the pioneers of Science fiction and was so big she eclipsed her own hugely famous husband in the public conscious for most of the 1900s until now.
And Ursula Le Guin, feminist loser she is who hasn't written shit of value in decades, set a lot of the ideas for the fantasy genre as it adapted to being not carbon copies of Tolkein after the 60s.
Shit To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the most American novels out there and literally anyone over the age of 15 probably knows the story. Woman writer in the 50s.
Writing has always been one of the most "women friendly" arenas out there, they just weren't churning out the vast amount of words that men as a whole were. Meaning they just weren't found as often due to sheer numerical disadvantage.
You can't, because women make up the vast vast majority of book readers and consumers these days. The entire publishing industry is carried on the back of smut and true crime, both domains of women for women.
Like, ignoring all the ideological angles (which is clearly there), the money flows because of women and that means they will always be the primary focus. And in turn, they know the kind of vile, degenerate porn women want to read best (and the "totally not porn" as well like those self-help and misery books), which leads to them becoming the prime contributor as well.
I was in a writing class in high school, and even founded the writing club for that school with my actually published author teacher. Said club became almost entirely women, our publications were filled with cliche trite written by women, and all the votes and discussion about what was best were for the exact same shit women always want (emotional language, happy endings, progressive themes).
Books/writing stopped being a place men went to because alternative and more fulfilling forms of fictional entertainment exist now, leading to our numbers being spread thin across all the available options for each man's fancy. Wherein women don't engage in nearly as much and that keeps their fewer industries (like soap operas and daytime talk shows) so dominant and rich.
Biden won his election by literally doing nothing and not campaigning.
He would have absolutely won again if he did nothing and hadn't done that debate. He could have easily basement campaigned again and let the Media Vs Trump be the entire election cycle once again.
Every single thing that has happened since has been because he is incapable of not reacting, whether by idiocy or senility or dementia.
A man murdered by his psychotic wife, who had been abusing him for a while without much help from anyone.
Who Andy Dick took credit for getting her hooked on drugs months before the night she did it and bragged about it to all Hartman's friends. He also directly drove a different actor to suicide in 99, molested Trump's daughter on Jimmy Kimmel's show (and a lot of other people), and liked to scream "nigger" at hecklers when he was on stage. But was still welcome in Hollywood for over a decade after and is basically the entire inspiration for Roger from American Dad as a tribute to how "lovable" he was.
Which is probably one of my earliest pieces of antisemitism, how much I fucking hated Andy Dick who is a walking caricature of every Jewish stereotype.
Everyone knew it was going to be bad because they haven't made a good Dead Rising game since the very thing they were trying to remake, with every single sequel missing what made it good in some way. Yes that includes 2/OTR.
Lo and behold, nearly every single change shows that they don't understand what made it so special and removed clunky things that were part of the charm/soul of it leaving a boring, easy husk.
That's before you get to any woke nonsense.