I've been using "debate club nonsense" to describe it, and I feel that summarizes it the best.
They consider victory in the same way a debate club does. Finding the correct combination of words, aggression, and other nonsense to just trip you up and confuse you. And once they do that, they consider themselves victorious and correct.
With all the various factions in our government (and international factions like Israel who've infiltrated) there will never be truly "undeniable" evidence. Even if they come out and say things directly and take full responsibility, half the country would say it was a lie, psyop and actually X behind it.
If we are being honest with ourselves, almost no official story would satisfy us. Even if the evidence was strong, it would only be taken if it was exactly what we wanted it to be and that would be regardless of evidence not because of it.
Its a symptom of our society being not even low trust but outright no trust in anything. For good reason, but still.
All good brother, we've all made that mistake. Especially in these long chains. No offense taken.
We've been in this GG hellscape for over a decade now, a lot of these memories blend together or get lost. Some of us have better recollection of some parts than others, like Antonio with his autism.
Very few people making licensed adaptations actually are adapting that work.
The "directors" are making their own work and then using the IP to get funding for it from the company, because nobody would give 500$ million for their "original screenplay" due to the giant risk. But Supergirl has brand value, so it makes them much more willing to give the funding.
That's before you get into the dozen of woke reasons they defile these properties, its an inherent issue with the system, where we the consumers are not part of the equation. Its just an "Artist" trying to game someone into paying them to make their "art" without a care if anyone cares to buy it.
And its the modern era, so "dark, depressing, and relatable real world issues" is basically all these perpetual teenagers can manage.
Its the Fundamental Attribution Error. A basic bitch psychological fallacy.
I (and my side) do wrong because of external circumstances that are justifiable, out of our control, or genuine mistakes that should be forgiven. You (and your side) do them because you are horrible evil people internally, and everything wrong you do is because of how evil/awful you are.
Its literally Psyche 101 lessons that every single person whose gone to college has taken the class to learn about. So the fact that they engage in it so uncritically shows just how stupid, intentionally or not, they are.
I can admit to being wrong about them being fake, though all the reasons I listed still stand as reasons to doubt. Not believing everything we see immediately is important to prevent ourselves from being manipulated and grifted. Its why that old Gamergate phrase said "trust but verify" instead of "listen and believe."
But considering you came back to claim your W from it, clearly I hit a nerve. I'm sorry your ego needed that, but you can have it. I'm happy to be proven wrong when the proof comes.
Its way too easy to get a random Leftie retard to commit violence for you that it would be idiotic to directly implicate yourself by directly doing it. Just hype up some random idiot, lay out enough incompetence that they can get through, and the job gets done (or the message across).
Its the same thing that happened with Trump's assassination attempt, he just got lucky (or saved by God) that the kid missed the kill.
It will cost half as much in 2-3 years
Someone's optimistic. Companies realized this mindset years ago, and have been actively working to prevent it from being true in most cases unless it was a massive flop or some other circumstance.
Most of them don't even get a full price reduction in 2-3 years, and you will be lucky if they go on bigger sale than 30% in that time frame.
One of the strongest elements of Leftism argumentation is the need to "cite" or "source" everything. Nothing can be self evident, you must have a hard definition for it with a "credible" backing for it.
So despite everyone knowing what you mean by Woke, because its not specifically defined its not a real thing and they can dismiss it entirely. And it looks successful to the masses because most people stumble in trying to answer the question that is designed to be unanswerable for 99% of us.
You can do that with almost any Leftie cause. Sluttery is bad, we all know it is and I don't need science to explain it. Same with criminal behavior. Same with unchecked immigration. Its self evident.
If you're going to call her out for retard behavior call her out for things that actually happened, don't make up stuff like some sort of Kotaku journalist.
I phrased it as a question because I wasn't 100% confident in my memory of it. That's how grammar and punctuation is meant to work, but I suppose we can just take the worst possible interpretation and respond with complete hostility to me literally asking for clarification because his version of events didn't seem right.
This statement relies on "Quinn was smart"
Smart enough to see a threat and nip it in the bud before it had a chance to become a thorn. Again, nothing changes about the fact that she is in it for herself and her only beneficial as a secondary effect.
Such as this entire crusade against Jews, which is just her beefing with Shapiro masking itself.
She was a retarded 19 year old.
And she hasn't shown an iota of increased intelligence or capability since other than knowing how to grift off being black and a woman. So there is no point in delineating as if she is a different person now.
Personally, I foresee a swing back to hard leftism in her future.
Considering her entire career is literally DEI but for the Right to use as "look, we aren't racist or sexist, we let a black woman say it and that makes us immune to identity politics!" I don't think she ever left Leftism. Because by principle, she owes everything she is to Leftist ideals and politics, and yet happily gulps it down for the power and money (like a good Leftie grifter).
She only turned on the Left in the first place because they wouldn't let her sit at their table, so she tantrummed her way to being their opponents on everything. And then the same scenario played out with the Jews at Daily Wire, who'd never let a non-Jew or nigger woman hold real power with them, so now she is tantrumming against Jews in the same way.
So that part at least doesn't seem like a red flag
If it was Facebook it would have his profile picture attached would it not? I don't think Facebook lets you just have a blank no image profile. I assumed it was Telegram, where you can choose your name and most people I know (who aren't arrogant blowhards like Fuentes) just use First name or nickname only because its meant to be private conversations.
You might be right, but that's where my radar took me.
you'd think it would have changed her earlier comments
She also wouldn't have backtracked on her comments in between all these events, like a "just asking questions (but I have no evidence)" person does if she had actual evidence such as this all along.
The entire reason she hasn't been fully laughed out of the room here is because if you say "DAE JEW BAD?!" then people will line up to support you uncritically and call anyone who questions you a Jew and attack them. Its pure confirmation bias at work here, where she is saying exactly what a portion of people want to hear and then inventing the evidence to keep the grift going.
And its not like there isn't evidence and a possibility that Israel is responsible here, but her very efforts promoting the idea is doing more to push people away from that possibility through sheer retardation and making shit up.
Not that it matters, really
It matters a whole lot actually. Its trying to attach a murdered man's name to your lies to try and leverage the indignation about his death for your cause. Its morally disgusting and abhorrent in every way.
Whatever his true feelings about Israel are are that and whatever words he said are what we have, and if they aren't enough to whip up your cause then you should work on building it up yourself instead of using the dead, who can't defend themselves against your manipulations, to do it for you.
Didn't she try to build it on her own and only turned to Quinn to try and get funding/support? Only to get Quinn to immediately try to destroy her and, as later leaked conversations showed, rallied all her little troops to help in doing so.
Doesn't change anything about your point, other than that even Quinn was smart enough to see how stupid she was. Owens was a Leftie with standard Leftie opinions until she got refused her place at the big kid table, and then decided to go angry black woman on them for rejecting her.
No part of this looks real in any form, and it should be a red flag onto yourself if you even believed it for a moment to be how blinded you are becoming by your own biases. Like really, a screenshot of a few texts with his full name attached to them as he says the most perfectly specific and direct thing possible in a manner no one speaks like?
If Mossad killed him is still a possibility, but trusting not only fucking Candice Owens and this weak ass "proof" is always going to be a losing choice because she is a literal DEI hire for the Right Wing with no further brain power above the common nigger monkey she hails from.
You'd be lucky to get 5k, and most of the time that was in vouchers for buying new "more eco friendly" cars instead of raw cash.
And yeah, by their own admission nearly 700000 cars were outright destroyed within the few year lifetime of the program.
Vehicle prices ever since then have been rapidly increasing, similarly to houses, at a rate that is almost impossible to sustain. And while people can rent homes forever, they can't with cars, so its going to explode badly quite soon.
he was actually already quite popular as an independent journalist
Aka a nobody to anyone who isn't terminally online and political obsessed. No offense meant by that my dude, but you know what I mean.
That incident is what catapulted him into main stream name recognition, a Right wing fan base (who would constantly attack his fence sitting for years after), and his current level of power.
It was absolutely his moment of cracking into the big leagues, even if he did so for entirely legitimate reasons.
I feel for you guys that love genres that are basically "Arcade mode only." That's doomed to always be both niche developed, likely Anime girl focused, and a huge risk of your once every few year game sucking.
My closest love is Gauntlet, which should be an easy sell in the modern era but has had one total game in close to 20 years and it sucked.
Just leaving all of that behind is easier said than done
And 5 years ago their country outright told them they will be rounded up and left to die for wrong think, and it was only by luck that the "pandemic" ended before they could continue down the path they were going.
They've already shown they aren't willing to fight back, so that part was already precluded from the options. Its not their home anymore, they ceded it years ago by giving up their guns. So they either accept the consequences of that shortsighted foolishness, or they leave to survive elsewhere.
If getting told your only options are to run or let yourself die because of cowardice is offensive, then you should be mad and use that to actually start fighting back.
Halo 2 and 3 are some of the best FPS campaigns in the history of gaming, especially in coop (unless you do Legendary in 2). That has always been the case and only contrarians tried to say otherwise at the time.
Its the exact moment when the games could reach their peak of distilling what people want from the genre, before needing to "innovate" to stand out against the crowd and limiting themselves to only being enjoyed by certain people.