Candace Owens dropping Kirk DMs. Israel looking more guilty by the day
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
No part of this looks real in any form, and it should be a red flag onto yourself if you even believed it for a moment to be how blinded you are becoming by your own biases. Like really, a screenshot of a few texts with his full name attached to them as he says the most perfectly specific and direct thing possible in a manner no one speaks like?
If Mossad killed him is still a possibility, but trusting not only fucking Candice Owens and this weak ass "proof" is always going to be a losing choice because she is a literal DEI hire for the Right Wing with no further brain power above the common nigger monkey she hails from.
Not saying it's real, but I will push back on this specific part. I'm no expert, as I don't really use social media, but that looks like Facebook...which has your full name attached. So that part at least doesn't seem like a red flag.
That said, the part that makes this hardest to believe is simply that Candace Owens keeps dribbling out these tasty details. She apparently had these DMs all along, at least if they're to her (haven't followed her story.) Why didn't she go harder on this from Day 1? She at least partially discredits herself when her story keeps - while not necessarily changing or contradicting itself per se - evolving.
I haven't followed everything, but it seems weird that more and more information keeps coming out from Candace when, if she'd known it all along, you'd think it would have changed her earlier comments. Why not say she had DMs like this from the start, instead of hints and suspicions? Again, haven't followed everything, so I could be getting it wrong (I do know she said she had some DMs pretty early, and almost from the start said Charlie had soured on Israel), but it still feels weird.
The far better play as a grifter would be to shut up about Israel and stay with her lucrative Daily Wire contract. This makes no sense. But then you seem to be one of those people that yell "grifter" at anyone talking about Jewish power.
Considering her entire career is literally DEI but for the Right to use as "look, we aren't racist or sexist, we let a black woman say it and that makes us immune to identity politics!" I don't think she ever left Leftism. Because by principle, she owes everything she is to Leftist ideals and politics, and yet happily gulps it down for the power and money (like a good Leftie grifter).
She only turned on the Left in the first place because they wouldn't let her sit at their table, so she tantrummed her way to being their opponents on everything. And then the same scenario played out with the Jews at Daily Wire, who'd never let a non-Jew or nigger woman hold real power with them, so now she is tantrumming against Jews in the same way.
If it was Facebook it would have his profile picture attached would it not? I don't think Facebook lets you just have a blank no image profile. I assumed it was Telegram, where you can choose your name and most people I know (who aren't arrogant blowhards like Fuentes) just use First name or nickname only because its meant to be private conversations.
You might be right, but that's where my radar took me.
She also wouldn't have backtracked on her comments in between all these events, like a "just asking questions (but I have no evidence)" person does if she had actual evidence such as this all along.
The entire reason she hasn't been fully laughed out of the room here is because if you say "DAE JEW BAD?!" then people will line up to support you uncritically and call anyone who questions you a Jew and attack them. Its pure confirmation bias at work here, where she is saying exactly what a portion of people want to hear and then inventing the evidence to keep the grift going.
And its not like there isn't evidence and a possibility that Israel is responsible here, but her very efforts promoting the idea is doing more to push people away from that possibility through sheer retardation and making shit up.
Could also be normal text messages. If you have multiple people called Charlie in your contacts you're likely to use their full name to keep them apart. I know that's what I would do because I don't like giving my phone contacts nicknames.
She could be holding the info to bait TPUSA into denials, like a cross examination.
This isn't Facebook. Looks like Signal, which uses phone contact names, but people often put full names in their contact list.
It is written closer to her cadence than how Charlie spoke. Not that it matters, really. There is video of Kirk calling out Israel right to Ben Shapiros face, a week or two before he was shot. Candace is trying to signal boost that in her own retarded way
It matters a whole lot actually. Its trying to attach a murdered man's name to your lies to try and leverage the indignation about his death for your cause. Its morally disgusting and abhorrent in every way.
Whatever his true feelings about Israel are are that and whatever words he said are what we have, and if they aren't enough to whip up your cause then you should work on building it up yourself instead of using the dead, who can't defend themselves against your manipulations, to do it for you.
Turns out it was real though so all that sperging from you was all for nothing
I can admit to being wrong about them being fake, though all the reasons I listed still stand as reasons to doubt. Not believing everything we see immediately is important to prevent ourselves from being manipulated and grifted. Its why that old Gamergate phrase said "trust but verify" instead of "listen and believe."
But considering you came back to claim your W from it, clearly I hit a nerve. I'm sorry your ego needed that, but you can have it. I'm happy to be proven wrong when the proof comes.
I mean you literally opened your original comment implying there was something wrong with me for trusting Candace, so yeah, I'm gonna take it a little personally.
And everything I said is still valid. Trusting her just because she said it, and limped out with this incredibly suspicious screenshot is foolishness that would be laughed at if it didn't fit exactly what you wanted to believe.
Do you care about opposing Israel and Jews out of principle, and care for some sort of moral truth, or just to have your ego validated for noooticing super hard?