Wikipedia is terrible. It's pretty obvious a lot of it is literally just made up. Like some 60yo lesbian leftist decided to just makeup a story for some niche thing in history and blasted with everywhere. I've seen way too many patterns like this in Wikipedia. I wouldn't even be shocked to learn the government and major corps were using Wikipedia to test early editions of AI by making stuff up and seeing if people would notice or be able to correct for anything made up.
Wikipedia is useful for things that require hard facts but if you're reading anything that is even slightly subjective, it's brutally bad.
The January 6 and Gamergate articles are notoriously awful, as is the "White Replacement conspiracy theory" one. And I'm scared to even look up Yasuke.
I honestly find the Weatherman and Uncle Ted pages to be just as awful, endless excuses for the Weatherman and claims that they never killed anyone and painting Uncle Ted as Hitler incarnate, and even the first paragraph refuses to call the Weatherman far left while gleefully painting Uncle Ted as far right and no mention of him being an MK Ultra victim either last I saw. They're genuinely the most pathetic and contemptible people imaginable, Wikipedia jannies I mean.
Absolutely. Reminds of the news in my country recently. They announced right wing extremism is statistically the bigger threat and failed to mention all islamists are put into that category. Of course they chose neo nazis as a picture for their article.
And this article here is essentially why. It works fine if everyone is working towards a common goal in good faith; it totally falls to pieces in the face of even mild subversion.
Taken out, in part, by someone who goes by Chaotic Enby (and enby is apparently slang for non-binary).
Sorry Larry. You should have worshipped the girl dicked xhey/xhem more fervently. And maybe not have been born white because being male is obviously a choice as shown by one of those who deposed you.
The silver lining might might be that some more normies wake up to the reality that lefty bullshit has shit up yet another decent idea.
The Eric Corbett saga is one of feminist infiltration of WP. For those unaware the dude was an amazing article writer (you know, the supposed purpose of WP) but also a raging asshole. His assholery made him a lot of enemies but his article writing made him a lot of friends, and any attempt to ban him deadlocked as a result. Then the feminists took over WP. Corbett wasn't exactly our ally but he opposed many of the bad actors that were shitting up the GG article and destroying WP's internal processes with DEI (Corbett only really focused on the latter; he wasn't involved in the GG clusterfuck). He was actually hauled before WP's kangaroo court around the same as the fight over the GG article. It took a couple years but the feminists were finally able to knife him for good. It's insane if you think about it. The dude had so many enemies, some of the very powerful, but he was untouchable. Then he crossed the feminists controlling WP and that was the end.
Yeah, that's fair. When I say he wasn't exactly our ally I meant he wasn't one of the people directly trying to unfuck the articles that we focus on. His main article work was on uncontroversial encyclopedic topics. It's just that the people shitting up the articles were also maliciously gaming WP's internal processes to go after their opponents so we shared a common enemy with Corbett. It's less that he disagreed with us and more that he was fighting a different but loosely related battle against the same bad actors.
That's extremely difficult to avoid these days without certain (((groups))) subverting and stealing it, or other groups, [do we have a sign for China?], subverting and stealing it.
Truth Socail has not failed at all. This site gets waves. But, since I'm personally very excited when I hit my goals of not wasting so much time online, I get it.
There's about 26 or 60 ( I don't remember) "anonymous" editors that basically run the entire site. They're almost certainly controlled by the usual suspects, and CIA.
Yeah, sometimes the actual creators/founders get kicked out or worse because other people come along and co-opt. Happens all the time to almost everything. One does not truly own a thing without being able to defend a thing. We live in a world where some people can't stand not having total control over everything that is good.
You can't ever let leftists have any kind of power or authority in your organization. Letting a single one slip through means the whole thing will eventually be infected and rotted out and there's no way to recover once they've sunk the roots in.
Wikipedia is terrible. It's pretty obvious a lot of it is literally just made up. Like some 60yo lesbian leftist decided to just makeup a story for some niche thing in history and blasted with everywhere. I've seen way too many patterns like this in Wikipedia. I wouldn't even be shocked to learn the government and major corps were using Wikipedia to test early editions of AI by making stuff up and seeing if people would notice or be able to correct for anything made up.
Wikipedia is useful for things that require hard facts but if you're reading anything that is even slightly subjective, it's brutally bad.
The January 6 and Gamergate articles are notoriously awful, as is the "White Replacement conspiracy theory" one. And I'm scared to even look up Yasuke.
I honestly find the Weatherman and Uncle Ted pages to be just as awful, endless excuses for the Weatherman and claims that they never killed anyone and painting Uncle Ted as Hitler incarnate, and even the first paragraph refuses to call the Weatherman far left while gleefully painting Uncle Ted as far right and no mention of him being an MK Ultra victim either last I saw. They're genuinely the most pathetic and contemptible people imaginable, Wikipedia jannies I mean.
I want your opinion on the grokpedia articles. Please read and tell me what you think.
Wasn't there some scheme to delete the early life sections of bios for obvious reasons?
The worst is "far right" vs "far left". "Far right" is handed out like candy, while like 1 member of "the squad" is called "far left".
Absolutely. Reminds of the news in my country recently. They announced right wing extremism is statistically the bigger threat and failed to mention all islamists are put into that category. Of course they chose neo nazis as a picture for their article.
And this article here is essentially why. It works fine if everyone is working towards a common goal in good faith; it totally falls to pieces in the face of even mild subversion.
It's just like jury trials.
I remember when they edited the article on antifa's history because I was sharing it literally everywhere i could
Taken out, in part, by someone who goes by Chaotic Enby (and enby is apparently slang for non-binary).
Sorry Larry. You should have worshipped the girl dicked xhey/xhem more fervently. And maybe not have been born white because being male is obviously a choice as shown by one of those who deposed you.
The silver lining might might be that some more normies wake up to the reality that lefty bullshit has shit up yet another decent idea.
Not while there's goyslop and niggerball
Eric corbett learned the hard way before larry did
The Eric Corbett saga is one of feminist infiltration of WP. For those unaware the dude was an amazing article writer (you know, the supposed purpose of WP) but also a raging asshole. His assholery made him a lot of enemies but his article writing made him a lot of friends, and any attempt to ban him deadlocked as a result. Then the feminists took over WP. Corbett wasn't exactly our ally but he opposed many of the bad actors that were shitting up the GG article and destroying WP's internal processes with DEI (Corbett only really focused on the latter; he wasn't involved in the GG clusterfuck). He was actually hauled before WP's kangaroo court around the same as the fight over the GG article. It took a couple years but the feminists were finally able to knife him for good. It's insane if you think about it. The dude had so many enemies, some of the very powerful, but he was untouchable. Then he crossed the feminists controlling WP and that was the end.
Anyone with integrity, even if we disagree, is my ally.
Yeah, that's fair. When I say he wasn't exactly our ally I meant he wasn't one of the people directly trying to unfuck the articles that we focus on. His main article work was on uncontroversial encyclopedic topics. It's just that the people shitting up the articles were also maliciously gaming WP's internal processes to go after their opponents so we shared a common enemy with Corbett. It's less that he disagreed with us and more that he was fighting a different but loosely related battle against the same bad actors.
This is why you NEVER give up control of anything you create.
That's extremely difficult to avoid these days without certain (((groups))) subverting and stealing it, or other groups, [do we have a sign for China?], subverting and stealing it.
Trying to keep something (((they))) want to subvert is a good way to die of suicide with two bullets in the back of your head...
It's not hard, he just got tricked. Probably got swindled into giving up shares or whatever.
That's a feature, not a bug.
Grokipedia is superior anyway.
How so?
I prefer articles i edit lol
We should make a list of alternatives. Because every time I think I find one, I forget when it comes time to use one.
Alteranatives always fail
Case in point: scored.
Only w--p--d suceeded.
Truth Socail has not failed at all. This site gets waves. But, since I'm personally very excited when I hit my goals of not wasting so much time online, I get it.
Nobody outside mega Trump fans use Truth Social.
The haters are there just to hate. Its pretty fun when I'm in the mood to make people block me.
Doesn't seem like most haters feel bothered enough to setup an account.
Dankula's video on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpcEXnAMWm0
The interview he did with Carlson is pretty good.
There's about 26 or 60 ( I don't remember) "anonymous" editors that basically run the entire site. They're almost certainly controlled by the usual suspects, and CIA.
He should scrape Wikipedia's old articles and make a new website with that content.
Alt websites pretty much always fail because the mainstream ones are big.
Dubya pee dee is like, the only exception.
The world has been waking up. I bet it would get traction.
Thats what leftistst want. And this is the definition of communism. What did Stalin do to friends that fell out of favor?
is there a genuine right wing alternative to ZOGpedia?
Yeah, sometimes the actual creators/founders get kicked out or worse because other people come along and co-opt. Happens all the time to almost everything. One does not truly own a thing without being able to defend a thing. We live in a world where some people can't stand not having total control over everything that is good.
You can't ever let leftists have any kind of power or authority in your organization. Letting a single one slip through means the whole thing will eventually be infected and rotted out and there's no way to recover once they've sunk the roots in.
"Are we the baddies?"
https://grokipedia.com/page/Larry_Sanger
I like Wikipedia because every mass shooting article has been editted by me.
The jannies there suck though. They banned me 60+ times
Those are rookie numbers; 109 minimum
Alanis Morissette - Ironic