I've got to believe that the idea "people who define themselves by sexual degeneracy act sexually degenerate" will hit the mainstream soon. There have been too many examples of "Will and Grace lied to you" in the news recently for it to escape notice.
Not big news but big in evangelical circles: This week a pastor and lead proponent of "gay celibacy" was fired because he had an "inappropriate relationship" with a man. Sooner or later even the most naive will have to acknowledge it.
Not big news but big in evangelical circles: This week a pastor and lead proponent of "gay celibacy" was fired because he had an "inappropriate relationship" with a man.
Does "gay celibacy" mean that whatever you do is OK as long as you don't have gay sex?
According to Side B (it's a whole thing) you can still identify as gay, hang out at gay clubs, act and speak flamboyantly, but as long as you don't actually act on it, you're good.
it makes sense if you separate love and sex. just like how straight couples can have abstinent relationships, the theory goes that the person can be gay and be part of a gay relationship, but simply doesn't engage in sex.
that's the theory anyway. in practice, the crossover between promiscuous whore and homosexual is so huge that a gay celibate is a unicorn.
just like how straight couples can have abstinent relationships
Already a faulty premise lol. For some time the relationship can be abstinent, yes, but even with traditional Christians it'll eventually break off or be consummated through marriage.
If you talk to enough gay people you'll realize nearly all gays were groomed as children by an older man. It stands to reason gay people will continue the cycle with any children they adopt since there is evidence that kids who were abused do in fact have a larger tendency to abuse children when they become adults. However, this evidence is being hidden. AI has to be tricked into admitting it because initially it tries to lie and say that's not the case. People who were abused as kids are 2-3x more likely to abuse kids as adults themselves. I bet you if you control for gays specifically, that number rises significantly and I bet you if you control for "opportunity" it rises even higher (basically, the idea is more gay men would abuse children if given the opportunity to but many don't simply because they are never out in a position where it's easy for them to otherwise they would).
I'd guess gay men with an opportunity to abuse kids are something like 5-10x more likely to abuse children than straight men.
If you support liberalism then you support gay pedos raping babies to death. You have no moral rejoinder. When they say all restraints on human behavior are wrong, they really mean ALL RESTRAINTS.
Anyone who does not realize this is a clueless moron or a gay pedo who wants to rape babies to death.
Who could have predicted the practice of buying children would have negative consequences..?
TFD
I've got to believe that the idea "people who define themselves by sexual degeneracy act sexually degenerate" will hit the mainstream soon. There have been too many examples of "Will and Grace lied to you" in the news recently for it to escape notice.
Not big news but big in evangelical circles: This week a pastor and lead proponent of "gay celibacy" was fired because he had an "inappropriate relationship" with a man. Sooner or later even the most naive will have to acknowledge it.
Does "gay celibacy" mean that whatever you do is OK as long as you don't have gay sex?
According to Side B (it's a whole thing) you can still identify as gay, hang out at gay clubs, act and speak flamboyantly, but as long as you don't actually act on it, you're good.
"I just flirt with Satan."
Yea.. good luck, Pastor.
OK then. "I can browse porn without thinking about sex"
Wasn't it Ghandi who insisted that all the most attractive women of his movement slept naked with him, so he could "prove" his celibacy?
That's gay
it makes sense if you separate love and sex. just like how straight couples can have abstinent relationships, the theory goes that the person can be gay and be part of a gay relationship, but simply doesn't engage in sex.
that's the theory anyway. in practice, the crossover between promiscuous whore and homosexual is so huge that a gay celibate is a unicorn.
Already a faulty premise lol. For some time the relationship can be abstinent, yes, but even with traditional Christians it'll eventually break off or be consummated through marriage.
So single mother = criminal children, lesbian parents = trans children, gay parents = molested children...
"Itz dey culcha" gay edition.
This but unironically. It's a known pattern but we aren't allowed to recognize that.
If you talk to enough gay people you'll realize nearly all gays were groomed as children by an older man. It stands to reason gay people will continue the cycle with any children they adopt since there is evidence that kids who were abused do in fact have a larger tendency to abuse children when they become adults. However, this evidence is being hidden. AI has to be tricked into admitting it because initially it tries to lie and say that's not the case. People who were abused as kids are 2-3x more likely to abuse kids as adults themselves. I bet you if you control for gays specifically, that number rises significantly and I bet you if you control for "opportunity" it rises even higher (basically, the idea is more gay men would abuse children if given the opportunity to but many don't simply because they are never out in a position where it's easy for them to otherwise they would).
I'd guess gay men with an opportunity to abuse kids are something like 5-10x more likely to abuse children than straight men.
That would require me to permit the abomination to speak to me.
this forum is awesome. it's like a hybrid of the golden age of r/consumeproduct and r/milliondollarextreme, but with far less members.
It's like 7chan after 4chan became unusable due to all the newfags.
Keep the gates. Less members is often a good thing.
the only thing that happens happened again
Are people out there still pretending these disgusting deviants are "stunning and brave"?
Besides reddit I mean.
not "one of the first..."
not some arbitrary participant...
literally the first. the very first in Britain.
If you support liberalism then you support gay pedos raping babies to death. You have no moral rejoinder. When they say all restraints on human behavior are wrong, they really mean ALL RESTRAINTS.
Anyone who does not realize this is a clueless moron or a gay pedo who wants to rape babies to death.
Yup. I wonder what its going to take to get normies to realize it
They'll still praise him in their dystopian school textbooks anyhow.
Disgust is a natural response for a reason.