How long until you are banned from turning off FSD?
(twitter.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Boy, I'd sure like to see some granularity in the human numbers. I suspect it'd tell a very interesting story.
FSD probably turns itself off 1 second before many of the crashes
"Hey Grok, remove all jeets from the study. Then remove all women."
It's women and foreigners causing most of the problems, as usual.
How long until it’s illegal for you to drive at all?
Don't worry, the price of fuel will get most people first.
The price of a vehicle will get them before that.
I'd be ok with banning a good 80% of the population from driving ever again. Holy shit my morning commute is all the evidence I need to know a huge segment of society should never set foot in a motor vehicle.
Keep in mind that Tesla legally washes their hands of any FSD accident where the driver didn't have both hands on the steering wheel, which kind of destroys the draw of FSD. There's cases of Tesla drivers burning up in their cars because they were sleeping in the back seat or something and couldn't solve the Resident Evil puzzle to trigger the manual door release after the car plowed itself into a tree and the battery turned into the pit of hell.
Also, the robotaxis and Waymos that don't have any driver actually do have a driver, either acting like the Blue Man Group or sitting in front of a computer in the Philippines.
sounds like a prelude to a very dystopian universe where saying "faggot" or "nigger" automatically locks up the car and you're therefore banned from driving
"Oops! You're on your own, bitch!"
This is an AI graph. There are two different values with the same label.
Or a deliberate separation of numbers. Combining the two makes it a little over 3 million. “More than double” sounds better than “Almost double”.
If you zoom in there are also artifacts in the text. The legend is text that has all been resized differently, which you would not have to do in any normal graph software. The light grey bar is not square and has an odd shading pattern, it's like an inside gradient but not consistent enough. The corners are rounded but not consistently. The text has smeary artifacts, gaps, and is not consistently filled in. So yeah, likely an ai image.
Weird because you can quite easily get AI to use a graph program.
Its easy to be a safer driver than an h1b jeet, retarded gen z, and asian drivers. So this isn't saying much.
Now do the same test but stop counting a literal billion jeets.
It's all good until the AI decides your life isn't worth as much as a truck smuggling illegals on the same road.
It won’t be banned in the near future. However, insurance rates for traditional cars will be unaffordable for the 99%.
And then everyone will ignore the law and drive illegally, but only whites will be punished for it.
I don't for a moment believe this isn't idiots reading data wrong because of their own ineptitude, likely motivated by others' malice.
Correlation does not imply causation.
What about Teslas driven automatically (unsupervised)? It seems to be a notable missing data point when your thesis is "fewer human elements = better results". Also, "Teslas driven manually (Active safety features)" appears twice in the graph, with wildly different numbers, which is a little sus.
I was watching some video that was talking about how you won’t be able to afford insurance to drive a normal car in the near future, that’s how they’re going to force us all into AI driven vehicles. On top of that, Elon will soon be offering a cheap “car” that doesn’t have a steering wheel, it’s always driven by AI, it’ll be the only way the average person will be able to afford to drive anymore, which opens the door to AI Governance dictating how much we are allowed to travel, so the carbon credit system will take shape through that, but it’ll also apply to what goyslop you’re allowed to eat.
I dread this incoming techno-communist world, and there’s basically no way to avoid it because people are too stupid to see it coming, or to understand how bad it’s going to be for their daily life.
We are super lucky that autonomous driving is as difficult as it is to solve. Accidental political car accidents would not only be routine (one could argue that is the case now), but would probably grow 5x.
So can I drink if FSD is doing the driving?
"PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN TO START ENGINE!
PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN TO PLAY MUSIC!
PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN TO AVOID ORGAN HARVESTING LAY-BY!"
Soooo, who collected this data? Tesla? The company with a vested interest in people adopting it's tech?
So I don't have FSD but I turn on Cruise control when I'm about to drive 100 miles in a straight line. I drive without to the supermarket down the street. So one collision from each results in the very lopsided graph shown above, I can also tell you which collision I'd rather be in because I'm much more likely to walk away from it.
Yeah because it drives like a Grandma.
I don't have a Tesla but with the insane drivers in my area, no way in hell I'd use FSD.
If you were dumb enough to buy a Tesla you deserve whatever you get
I wonder if they (insurance companies) differentiate between HW3 and HW4 models. Because FSD with HW3 is still pretty derpy.
They know this because over the last few years all cars have been hoovering all driving information about people.