By no means am I saying that they're the majority of women. Merely that there's more than people think. They just aren't a group that holds up a sign saying here we are.
I wouldn't say church is strictly a no go, but it depends on your denomination.
All influencers are suspect to begin with. I don't trust any of them. If it's a female it's even worse because they're just playing the game to reel in that simp cash.
Any "trad" woman with an active social media presence (especially TikTok or other visual mediums) can be safely dismissed as a tradthot attention whore. Just another scheme to extract simpbux.
A real trad woman is busy raising her family and, at most, posting happy family pics for her friends and distant family
Words are magic spells to them. Back when I was naive enough to try to have a dialogue with feminists it was their Humptydumptyism that turned me off the whole enterprise. Take a word or a concept and they would change its meaning mid conversation without acknowledging they've done so and gaslight you about it. It makes it impossible to have an honest conversation which is the whole point for them.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
Well they are but they become mudsharks because jews in academia guilt trip them for being White and shit while (((they))) were the ones who enslaved and imported niggers to America
It's astounding how obsessed yall are with the idea of interracial dating. Even if I mock a large amount of ut myself I don't just randomly bring it up because it hardly happens in the first place
Beacuse its disgusting beastilaity im sick of seeing. I only ever see young White woman betray young White man and their own race.
And i wish it was rare. I live in a red state that is suppsoedly majorty White and yet all i ever fucking see is young White woman with jogger or wetback. The number of young White woman with young White man couples i see i can count on my hands. Its beyond blackpilling
You sound like a loser lol. It's statistically rare so congrats on seeing the minority everywhere. Black people are humans so there is no bestiality involved. That is a decidedly jewish concept 🤔.
The whole piece is structured around the anecdotal experience of a woman who adopted right wing talking points for “aesthetic” reasons then quickly turned away when her feelings were hurt. Now she’s gossiping about her former friends behind the cover of anonymity. If the goal of the article is to actually prove the “misogynists” right then I have to say it’s profoundly effective.
The piece also cites Hannah Cox who was never conservative, much less a serous or intelligent person. And Ashley St Clair who recently came out as pro-trans just to spite Elon Musk. The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article. Amazing.
There are some people who identify as "right wing" who are definitely nasty to women and embrace a third-world mentality that would be better suited to Afghanistan, but they are mostly just trolls, not mainstream MAGA figures let alone elected officials. And to be honest, the left's trolls are just as nasty to women whose politics they disagree with. This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
Once again the critics of “rw misogyny” end up proving the thesis that a surprising percentage of women cannot discuss ideas or policy without taking it personally and policing the tone of the conversation.
Mostly this piece is boring and predictable but I will say that “Don’t publicly trash your old side unless you’re willing to put your name next to it” is one of those honor-based rules of open conflict that feminized societies just don’t get, so thanks for illustrating the point.
Evie mag founder Brittany Hugoboom claims to know who "Anna" is but won't reveal her identity.
It’s Hannah Cox and the Substack “based” feminists who constantly attack any woman who comments positively on men. “Anna” flipped on me years ago out of nowhere.
This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
Yeah, that's every article. Journalists don't pick a topic, research it with an open mind, then report what they found. They already have the article half written by the time they start calling people, and they pick the people they call based on the quotes they want.
Without getting too specific, I have a friend who is vaguely notable, who sometimes gets calls from journalists writing articles about his field. 100% of the calls are from journalists writing articles agreeing with what his public position is, and they'll often simply feed him their thesis: "Would you agree that this law is bad and will cause damage to <whatever> because of <something>"?, sometimes followed by, when he inevitably agrees because they knew he would before they called him, "OK, now would you say that?", thereby allowing the journalists to write their own quotes.
Reporting isn't about reporting what's happening. It's about convincing the audience to agree with the reporter, while pretending it's merely reporting what's happening.
if you ever get the chance, observe a journalist during a court proceeding or legislative session. you will notice they will have half their article written before proceedings even start.
The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article.
It's like MAGA isn't rightwing in the first place, so of course you are going to find nothing but liberals there. It's just Trumps ego cult. If any of them actually wanted what is good for America they would be talking about how to make spics afraid to be in America. (It doesn't even have to be real violence, they just have to think that. An advertising campaing talking about how millions of spics are getting killed by ICE every week would do wonders. )
Scratch a tradthot and a feminist bleeds.
Actually traditional women, aren't on Instagram trying to prove it. They're already married and in their house wrangling babies, cooking and cleaning.
Yeah but those are very few and far between
The larper thots far outnumber them
More than you'd think, I'd say. The ratio isn't as bad as all that.
Because they don't advertise.
Looking for a decent woman on Instagram is like trying to find a babysitter in the red light district.
While this is true, and a good point, the problem is there aren't many places where you can find the actual tradwench.
Church is absolutely a no-go.
As Rich Cooper oftentimes rightly points out, the final form for a promiscuous woman is Christianity.
By no means am I saying that they're the majority of women. Merely that there's more than people think. They just aren't a group that holds up a sign saying here we are.
I wouldn't say church is strictly a no go, but it depends on your denomination.
They dont exist. All i ever seee is worthless vermin like mudshark vermin which i wish we could put in gulags
Well then by all means give up on life and retreat into your corner. That'll show em.
Meanwhile you live in delusion land
Lmao I have five white kids and a beautiful white wife more based than almost anyone on this board.
Try again.
Shhh, TheImp is going to wake up.
All influencers are suspect to begin with. I don't trust any of them. If it's a female it's even worse because they're just playing the game to reel in that simp cash.
Any "trad" woman with an active social media presence (especially TikTok or other visual mediums) can be safely dismissed as a tradthot attention whore. Just another scheme to extract simpbux.
A real trad woman is busy raising her family and, at most, posting happy family pics for her friends and distant family
I'm stealing this
Find me a woman who actually means a single word she says.
Words are magic spells to them. Back when I was naive enough to try to have a dialogue with feminists it was their Humptydumptyism that turned me off the whole enterprise. Take a word or a concept and they would change its meaning mid conversation without acknowledging they've done so and gaslight you about it. It makes it impossible to have an honest conversation which is the whole point for them.
Foids are retarded unintelligent creatures
They don't think, they feel, they say things that earns them goodfeels from specific people
I.e other women pretend they like trannies because that's what the hivemind (ZOG) has convinced women to think
If they had any personality or soul they'd be Leonarda Jonie which is a raging jew/nigger/faggot hater with proper convictions
The mudsharking proves they are evil
Well they are but they become mudsharks because jews in academia guilt trip them for being White and shit while (((they))) were the ones who enslaved and imported niggers to America
They should not mudshark. That is irredeemable evil
Yes mr chang, it is borderline bestiality with disastrous outcome for the future of the nation.
Good thing Christ is the authority on evil and not some random retard on the internet
Mudsharking is beatiality you retard
It's astounding how obsessed yall are with the idea of interracial dating. Even if I mock a large amount of ut myself I don't just randomly bring it up because it hardly happens in the first place
Beacuse its disgusting beastilaity im sick of seeing. I only ever see young White woman betray young White man and their own race.
And i wish it was rare. I live in a red state that is suppsoedly majorty White and yet all i ever fucking see is young White woman with jogger or wetback. The number of young White woman with young White man couples i see i can count on my hands. Its beyond blackpilling
You sound like a loser lol. It's statistically rare so congrats on seeing the minority everywhere. Black people are humans so there is no bestiality involved. That is a decidedly jewish concept 🤔.
Racemixing is White genocide and beastiality. It makes ot so that White woman betray their race.
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2032163961752145981
https://x.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/2032167777658687998
https://x.com/InezFeltscher/status/2032136674717679818
https://x.com/herandrews/status/2032061768759918710
Evie mag founder Brittany Hugoboom claims to know who "Anna" is but won't reveal her identity.
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032168184875188513
Me FYI https://x.com/BigOrmie/status/2032174270034661732
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032174483729957265
Yeah, that's every article. Journalists don't pick a topic, research it with an open mind, then report what they found. They already have the article half written by the time they start calling people, and they pick the people they call based on the quotes they want.
Without getting too specific, I have a friend who is vaguely notable, who sometimes gets calls from journalists writing articles about his field. 100% of the calls are from journalists writing articles agreeing with what his public position is, and they'll often simply feed him their thesis: "Would you agree that this law is bad and will cause damage to <whatever> because of <something>"?, sometimes followed by, when he inevitably agrees because they knew he would before they called him, "OK, now would you say that?", thereby allowing the journalists to write their own quotes.
Reporting isn't about reporting what's happening. It's about convincing the audience to agree with the reporter, while pretending it's merely reporting what's happening.
if you ever get the chance, observe a journalist during a court proceeding or legislative session. you will notice they will have half their article written before proceedings even start.
Journalists also frequently get story ideas quashed by their editors.
Or pitch a story idea, only to have their editor transform it to a completely different narrative that's better for their masters.
It's like MAGA isn't rightwing in the first place, so of course you are going to find nothing but liberals there. It's just Trumps ego cult. If any of them actually wanted what is good for America they would be talking about how to make spics afraid to be in America. (It doesn't even have to be real violence, they just have to think that. An advertising campaing talking about how millions of spics are getting killed by ICE every week would do wonders. )