The whole piece is structured around the anecdotal experience of a woman who adopted right wing talking points for “aesthetic” reasons then quickly turned away when her feelings were hurt. Now she’s gossiping about her former friends behind the cover of anonymity. If the goal of the article is to actually prove the “misogynists” right then I have to say it’s profoundly effective.
The piece also cites Hannah Cox who was never conservative, much less a serous or intelligent person. And Ashley St Clair who recently came out as pro-trans just to spite Elon Musk. The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article. Amazing.
There are some people who identify as "right wing" who are definitely nasty to women and embrace a third-world mentality that would be better suited to Afghanistan, but they are mostly just trolls, not mainstream MAGA figures let alone elected officials. And to be honest, the left's trolls are just as nasty to women whose politics they disagree with. This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
Once again the critics of “rw misogyny” end up proving the thesis that a surprising percentage of women cannot discuss ideas or policy without taking it personally and policing the tone of the conversation.
Mostly this piece is boring and predictable but I will say that “Don’t publicly trash your old side unless you’re willing to put your name next to it” is one of those honor-based rules of open conflict that feminized societies just don’t get, so thanks for illustrating the point.
Evie mag founder Brittany Hugoboom claims to know who "Anna" is but won't reveal her identity.
It’s Hannah Cox and the Substack “based” feminists who constantly attack any woman who comments positively on men. “Anna” flipped on me years ago out of nowhere.
This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
Yeah, that's every article. Journalists don't pick a topic, research it with an open mind, then report what they found. They already have the article half written by the time they start calling people, and they pick the people they call based on the quotes they want.
Without getting too specific, I have a friend who is vaguely notable, who sometimes gets calls from journalists writing articles about his field. 100% of the calls are from journalists writing articles agreeing with what his public position is, and they'll often simply feed him their thesis: "Would you agree that this law is bad and will cause damage to <whatever> because of <something>"?, sometimes followed by, when he inevitably agrees because they knew he would before they called him, "OK, now would you say that?", thereby allowing the journalists to write their own quotes.
Reporting isn't about reporting what's happening. It's about convincing the audience to agree with the reporter, while pretending it's merely reporting what's happening.
if you ever get the chance, observe a journalist during a court proceeding or legislative session. you will notice they will have half their article written before proceedings even start.
The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article.
It's like MAGA isn't rightwing in the first place, so of course you are going to find nothing but liberals there. It's just Trumps ego cult. If any of them actually wanted what is good for America they would be talking about how to make spics afraid to be in America. (It doesn't even have to be real violence, they just have to think that. An advertising campaing talking about how millions of spics are getting killed by ICE every week would do wonders. )
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2032163961752145981
https://x.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/2032167777658687998
https://x.com/InezFeltscher/status/2032136674717679818
https://x.com/herandrews/status/2032061768759918710
Evie mag founder Brittany Hugoboom claims to know who "Anna" is but won't reveal her identity.
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032168184875188513
Me FYI https://x.com/BigOrmie/status/2032174270034661732
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032174483729957265
Yeah, that's every article. Journalists don't pick a topic, research it with an open mind, then report what they found. They already have the article half written by the time they start calling people, and they pick the people they call based on the quotes they want.
Without getting too specific, I have a friend who is vaguely notable, who sometimes gets calls from journalists writing articles about his field. 100% of the calls are from journalists writing articles agreeing with what his public position is, and they'll often simply feed him their thesis: "Would you agree that this law is bad and will cause damage to <whatever> because of <something>"?, sometimes followed by, when he inevitably agrees because they knew he would before they called him, "OK, now would you say that?", thereby allowing the journalists to write their own quotes.
Reporting isn't about reporting what's happening. It's about convincing the audience to agree with the reporter, while pretending it's merely reporting what's happening.
if you ever get the chance, observe a journalist during a court proceeding or legislative session. you will notice they will have half their article written before proceedings even start.
Journalists also frequently get story ideas quashed by their editors.
Or pitch a story idea, only to have their editor transform it to a completely different narrative that's better for their masters.
It's like MAGA isn't rightwing in the first place, so of course you are going to find nothing but liberals there. It's just Trumps ego cult. If any of them actually wanted what is good for America they would be talking about how to make spics afraid to be in America. (It doesn't even have to be real violence, they just have to think that. An advertising campaing talking about how millions of spics are getting killed by ICE every week would do wonders. )