Nick Fuentes is definitely not gay
(twitter.com)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Glazing the 'looksmaxxing' dude who destroys his body with daily drug use and wears makeup while failing to achieve any real measure of masculinity and confidence and is allegedly being financed by famous homosexual Peter Thiel is definitely not gay.
I know that Nick is way too far gone to expect any logical consistency.
But you'd thinj the recent? revelation that Clavicular is just a Peter Thiel boytoy would have Fuentes stay clear considering Nick has been banging on the "Peter Theil owns JD Vance, so he can't be trusted" drum for the last two years.
Nick is even running cover for Israel. There is no reason why he would stay clear of Peter Thiel. His followers are clinically retarded anyway.
I'm jacked as hell having clavs soyboy fans tell me that having large pecs is a bad thing.
It does ruin the twink esthetic, but since you're black, probably not what you are going for.
rofl
Severe case of body dysmorphia. Literally no different from a tranny.
Bigorexia, or muscular dysmorphia
Not really the case for him. He's not big. He's just extremely lean.
He's an idiot.
Your body stops producing testosterone when you take it externally
Once you go on Post Cycle Therapy of some sort OR if he injects HCG, his fertility will come back in a few months.
Someone (maybe anon) called him the world's first male-to-male transsexual
Amazing how many retards destroy their own body for a few years of fame. At least dudes in major sports get paid quite a bit of money, and they’re on a lot safer steroids than these bimbos.
Former incel and long term looksmax guy who ascended in 2021 here. I know Clav and Clav didn't "ascend". He lost weight, took steroids, and went through puberty. It's all fake and gay. He was never ugly to begin with.
You're saying hitting yourself in the face with a hammer doesn't actually work? I'm shocked.
What? You mean I can't just hit the gym, do meth, take steroids and then bang 10/10 hotties every day? Fuck.
Incels right again.
It's all genetics.
It's all so tiresome.
I just want a straight-faced WN internet personality, who isn't a mixed rape baby who belongs to no land, doesn't model himself after an edgy character from a 20 year old movie, and has a family already.
Is that too much to ask?
Nick Fuentes is not a White nationalist. He said so himself. And he really never was.
White nationalists generally deny being white nationalists. Jared Taylor also calls himself a 'white advocate'. (But he is undoubtedly sincere and not a fed, nor a homosexual virgin.)
White nationalist is a retarded term anyway. White advocate is far more accurate.
Euro-Identitarian
This one is up for debate.
While having a family is at least some proof of vetting, single men make better radicals. Married dudes with kids will always have divided loyalties, something to lose, the chances that their wife is in the background threatening to leave them, etc.
As gay as it was in retrospect, that's what some of the Wifejak debate was with Fuentes two winters ago.
Daniel Concannon
Dear Diary, here are five more reasons it's a good idea to glaze Clavicular...
Too bad SNES_X and his alts aren't here. One of the other mods got him after his last Nick Fuentes crashout. I don't know what we'll do without him.
I was wondering why our resident Fuentes shill wasn't all over this. Nice to see you guys making use of the don't be a fag rule.
But who's going to call us losers now?
I'll call you a loser, if it will help.
Thank you. I already miss him less.
That's good to hear. Loser. :P
One of the other outsiders who keep posting here will pick up the slack I'm sure.
What happened?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/1ASFhYBL2y/x/c/ and similar threads. First his short-lived alt Bleach_America got banned, then his "main" account after he wouldn't take a hint.
He had some success in the 10s with zoomers, now he's past his prime and looking down the business end of 30.
I guess twink death is real.
Nick was actually more popular than he's ever been just a few short months ago. Then he started supporting Epstein of all people and burned all his bridges with people who were on the fence with him on the right. I guess he got fed-activated.
David Beckham; metrosexuality > Braden Peters (clavicular); lookism...same game; different brands.
I know I'm getting old because I'm asking if half of these are words.
I used to see unfamiliar terms and immediately hit the search. Now I mostly shrug and move on with my day.
How very skibidi gyatt rizzler six-seven of you.
My favorite relevant fever dream experience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVn4sBxLokA
Yo, stop rizzing my mogging man Clavicular dog.
He has a point. Every guy I know who is successful with women is taking TRT. Musk and Bezos most obviously started taking it themselves. I see more and more men getting filler/Botox. Everyone is being hush hush about it but men are being forced to take drugs to compete in today's market. The mainstream discourse is rather silent on this.
Compete in today's market? You mean fuck promiscuous whores? Just pay a prostitute. Less expensive and healthier than using drugs. Not like you're gonna get a stable relationship out of those women anyway.
The sex with prostitutes is better when you're on TRT btw (speaking from experience). It ups your sex drive and makes you want to ravage a hooker like she's a piece of meat way more than you normally would. The sex is better and you have a better chance with the semi-whores you don't find at the local brothel.
Not that I'm promoting what you're advocating... but professional slatterns are way cheaper than a girlfriend, and far less time-consuming.
That's what I found out when I was in Calgary. I remember going through my bank account and tracking the two years I was at my peak of dating. I saw over 100 different women, some only once, some over the course of a few months (none longer than a few months). I found based on all the dates and activities I was getting up to in order to meet women, I was spending close to $2000/month chasing women. I'd maybe get laid once a month on average and usually with women that weren't worth having sex with. In two years I probably only had sex through normal dating with a handful of women I was proud to have sex with.
For $1200/month I can fuck 4 girls who are all on par look wise (or better) with the women I'd be proud of fucking. The problem is most guys, myself included, want more than just mindless sex BUT that's just a hope and illusion. After over a decade of looking, it appears mindless sex is all women can offer. Also, ironically, the best relationships with women I've had were the ones that started off as nothing but mindless sex. Dating in itself is a waste of time, imo. It's not natural and not truly how women ought to meet and develop good relationships. Dating for women is just a way to have something to do. Most are not genuinely looking for more than that.
So, in the end, escorts win for the cost to what you get.
So is this the new term? Is it just under Staning?
And it's a good thing to pay $250,000 just so you can be 8 cm taller while being grotesquely ill-proportioned?
I thought he was openly gay.
Would make his catholic LARP even less believable than it already is.
Wtf is glazing clavicular?
glazing = fawning over someone
Clavicular = that someone