Why Young Women Moved Left While Young Men Stayed Sane
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Women are leftist by nature. Motherly instinct has them want to go “awww” and want to nurture and comfort everything no matter how stupid it was. They never should have been allowed in political decisions.
The “patriarchy” is the natural God-ordained way the world is supposed to work.
It's more that women are driven by a need for social approval over anything else. Even "motherly instinct" takes a back seat to the desire for plaudence and good vibes from their friend groups and from the overarching societal power structures, as evidenced by the fact that they will absolutely throw their own children under the bus if they voice the wrong opinions, or put them on puberty blockers and encourage them to mutilate themselves just to earn brownie points from the other girls in their yoga class. For as long as leftism has institutional power behind it, women will continue to virtue signal to its tenets.
Women's innate capacity for compassion & empathy are vastly misrepresented.
Most mothers do have instinctive nurturing traits that do kick in during the early years for their infants.
But women almost universally start neglecting their husbands & children's fathers years into the marriage. If the marriage even lasts at all, as they are the primary instigators of divorce & family breakups.
Women aren't romantic, they are courted. They can become completely asexual for long periods when bored until new hypergamous stimuli comes around.
Females innately all lust after the top 5-15% of alpha men while deeming all other men beneath them to be asexual worker drones at best. And invisible non-humans at the worst.
They are ruled by their emotions. They seem to succumb to hateful desires more readily then men & be more willing to express negative emotions, acting on them as we see with the ICE protests. Or 1984's depiction of young women as Big Brother's most zealous foot soldiers.
Women also can't cooperate amongst themselves. Women hate other women that they perceive as intrasexual competition, both friend & foe. They gossip, they backstab, they sabotage, they smear.
Obviously, empty eggcarton women seem to have externally-focused suicidal empathy for cats, criminals & invaders.
But their "compassion" remains very selective & superficial.
All true, and all of it driven by a fundamental insecurity, lack of self-awareness and lack of a core identity. This is what drives a woman's overwhelming need to feel like she's in control of her surroundings, often vicariously through a powerful man, which is the reason for the real fundamental political reality of women: the fact that whether they're on the left or the right, they are always the most enthusiastic supporters of authoritarianism, despotism and centralization of power.
Men, on the other hand, are much more self-reliant and inclined towards liberty as a driving political force because we are much more likely to have a core sense of our own identity that thrives on competition rather than consensus, and doesn't rely on a solipsistic need to have our own feelings and desires reflected back at us by absolutely everybody else around us.
yeah, romantic affection is an exclusively White male feeling
Quite true, they do seem to seek the social approval of being that mother more than actually caring. It's all about holier-than-thou because of how much they care. It doesn't matter how much it's all bullshit as long as all the other women parrot to them how great of a person they are.
It's also that women in groups tend to apply far far more social pressure to enforce conformity within the group. Far more than within male groups. And the consequences for a woman becoming ostracized from the group are likely a bit more severe (I don't think I need to expound on a lot of what that usually entails).
Plus leaving a group and trying to join another is probably tricky too. Not only is she likely to be followed and harassed by members of the original group, female groups in general seem to be rather gated and closely guarded against new women in general.
Pretty much the only surefire alternative to that fucked up dynamic is to find a decent husband, who has decent friends with their own non-harpy wives. Etc etc. Women really are their own worst nightmare. And feminism only adds to the poison and toxicity.
Upon which he adds another couple of factors that tap into these psycho-evolutionary leanings.
No Women are conformist. Back in the "good ole days" it would have been Women poking their head out of the kitchen window and calling the police because someone with long hair was walking past.
They are social enforcers. We just need to update what they are enforcing.
Women are naturally Maenads. This has been true for the entirety of human history. There is no “modern cause”, it’s biological and hardwired, even evolutionary biology and psychology admits this. Monogamy, family, society, and civility are patriarchal constructs. People keep pretending grandma would have never been this way, but she would have if the men of the time allowed it.
Modern grandmas are also still completely defenseless to the goy propaganda emanating from their idiot boxes.
I recall my grandmother weeping for Fentanyl Floyd when she was previously naturally racist with next-to-no lifetime contact with diversity.
Soon thereafter, the news had her frothing at the mouth with a "Two Minutes of Hate" bloodlust against the evil convoy plaid-&-tuque-wearing truckers standing up against Trudeau. When those same men being beaten with truncheons & rifle butts could've easily been her husband, brothers, sons-in-law, grandsons, etc.
Synopsis:
This wouldn't matter if we didn't also consider women equal to men, which began nearly 100 years ago. If women were accurately classed as sex objects needing guidance and protection, we could safely laugh off their silly "consensus" as female nattering. But, because we granted them the right to vote, because we literally bent over backwards to ensure their success in education and employment, because we granted them systemic power that they never earned, they are in positions to tear everything down.
We created an idiot proof society so that women could safely participate and we based decision making off consensus, not competence. Men made themselves redundant; that's why they're "checking out" of society. And, short of going full "Handmaid's Tale" (and don't you kid yourself into thinking women wouldn't love that), allowing society to collapse to the point that competence is once again required is the only way forward for men.
Smart phones/internet culture are just an accelerant for a society that accepted toxic philosophies and was already doomed. We have no choice now but to radically (and violently) restructure, or allow it to collapse, and rebuild without disfunctional ideas like "sex equality" and "one man, one vote".
The hard question is "How could obviously toxic ideologies take hold globally, all at once, when they objectively harm those who adopt them?" Is this even possible without a conscious will behind it? Who would have the motive, the influence, and the global reach to acheive something like this?
Leftism oppresses men to unjustly elevate women. Women are doing what's in their interest.
That is all. It's that simple.
People really overcomplicate things.
we maybe need to ban social media for young women only
Why limit it to young women? Its harmful effects are no less potent once they get older.
Sometimes I wonder if building civilization was worth it in the end. All civilizations produce effects that harm or kill off the men that produce them in the end, then the parasitic civilizations die off too.
Maybe. Maybe every single civilization has done so much heinous shit that it summons it's own destruction?
Obviously, Western Civilization is the best, most human, most righteous civilization to ever exist. However, it's done it's fair share of dirty deeds: non-consentual human experimentation, failing to live up to the standards it's set for itself when dealing with others, feeding niggers, etc.
Maybe civilizations all collapse when the weight of their sins overwhelms them?
Leftism benefits women, conservatism benefits men. At the end of the day, women want to control men, sleep with the top 20% of men and kill their children if they feel like it. Leftism is inherently feminine.
Leftism benefits women (and other 'protected groups') in the short to medium term, but ultimately degrades quality of life as the system collapses under its own weight. Conservatism (better phrased as "western traditional values", as no ideologies called "conservatism" have conserved anything) elevates those capable of leading, resulting in a better quality of life for most people over a medium to long term.
Pharmaceuticals.