Dunno my dude. Religious group looking to keep order within their families so that there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin with a government ready and willing to support exactly those actions seems to be on the same side as many of the posters of communities.win.
I've witnessed these 'communities' deal with professional thieves in ways that the UK police can't or won't.
A reform of how things are handled is needed, but I'm not sure there is only one option on this front.
You are bringing two distinct arguments to the same table here.
I'm against religion as a rule to live by. We can happily discuss the reasons behind that if you want.
The purpose of your thread, from my inferences of it, seems to be exploring how a group can protect its own because an external government cannot. I find this to be a worthwhile thing to explore and why a particular group can do this whilst others seemingly cannot.
Ball's in your court person who throws about childish insults as if they hold any weight xD
there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin
Those mudslime cretins rape British children, get them addicted to heroin, profit from the rape industry they created with the aid of the State, then steal government benefits meant for the least fortunate British citizens.
That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
let the public decide if it is better than the current system
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
feasible solution to Muslim led crimes
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.
This is actually biblical Christianity. Christians are called to settle disputes within the church because the government not only doesn't follow God's laws (so de facto would make bad rulings) but also because the government is known for persecuting the church.
If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life!
Thanks for the scripture, I first heard about this from Auron Macintyre a month or so ago.
When you have the government adjudicate disputes, you transfer that power from your local community to the government.
They act as if their enforcers are above the law, they harshly punish blasphemy against Islam far more than any other crime, they police language, and they want to torture people for thoughtcrime.
Honestly, they should be charged with impersonating a British police officer.
So jews have courts for their people and now islam has them too but when americans want to go back to a court system that supposedly was in their interest they're just crazy svoreign citizens.
Just vote harder.
Your entire argument is now "don't resist the mudslime invasion! Or else!"
https://archive.is/xbHAr#selection-2467.54-2471.99
Wouldn't you like that, you filthy mujeet. After all, you have confessed to the fact that Whites are your kind's worst enemies.
https://archive.is/gHgFM#selection-1645.122-1645.177
Keep begging for replies, you moloch-worshipping chomo.
Reply.
Dunno my dude. Religious group looking to keep order within their families so that there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin with a government ready and willing to support exactly those actions seems to be on the same side as many of the posters of communities.win.
I've witnessed these 'communities' deal with professional thieves in ways that the UK police can't or won't.
A reform of how things are handled is needed, but I'm not sure there is only one option on this front.
You are bringing two distinct arguments to the same table here.
I'm against religion as a rule to live by. We can happily discuss the reasons behind that if you want.
The purpose of your thread, from my inferences of it, seems to be exploring how a group can protect its own because an external government cannot. I find this to be a worthwhile thing to explore and why a particular group can do this whilst others seemingly cannot.
Ball's in your court person who throws about childish insults as if they hold any weight xD
Those mudslime cretins rape British children, get them addicted to heroin, profit from the rape industry they created with the aid of the State, then steal government benefits meant for the least fortunate British citizens.
Why do you not talk about this?
Sanity has entered the chat!
That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
Any of them insults landing yet tiger?
Ah, you believe little internet ticks and crosses.
That's sweet :)
Back when the internet was made up of opinion and facts which supported them, we could get some proper talking done and solutions found.
Why don't you pop back across to le reddit and have fun with your ups and downs?
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.
Many of their married women don't get legally married so they can claim benefits anyway.
All life takes advantage of exploits in systems to flourish. It's called opportunism and it's what separates us from pond algae.
Fix the system, not those able to gain from it.
Are you talking about Somalians, Tim Walz or Muslims?
Minnesota has all three, and it has pond scum too :)
Die immediately, dune coon.
Oh noes!
Imagine what just ignoring the government can achieve.
This is actually biblical Christianity. Christians are called to settle disputes within the church because the government not only doesn't follow God's laws (so de facto would make bad rulings) but also because the government is known for persecuting the church.
Supporting scripture:
-- 1 Cor. 6:1-3
Thank you for your diligence
Thanks for the scripture, I first heard about this from Auron Macintyre a month or so ago. When you have the government adjudicate disputes, you transfer that power from your local community to the government.
Orthodox Jewish communities have the same thing. It wouldn't surprise anyone that they are all super corrupt.
They act as if their enforcers are above the law, they harshly punish blasphemy against Islam far more than any other crime, they police language, and they want to torture people for thoughtcrime.
Honestly, they should be charged with impersonating a British police officer.
? doesn't exist
? does exist, but <-- this stage
? existing is a good thing
? being criticized is a prosecutable crime
? OK it existed and proven to be an obvious bad thing, but why are we still talking about this, time to move on
So jews have courts for their people and now islam has them too but when americans want to go back to a court system that supposedly was in their interest they're just crazy svoreign citizens.
Take notes.
It's a form of arbitration which unfortunately was allowed to happen and prosper.