Dunno my dude. Religious group looking to keep order within their families so that there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin with a government ready and willing to support exactly those actions seems to be on the same side as many of the posters of communities.win.
I've witnessed these 'communities' deal with professional thieves in ways that the UK police can't or won't.
A reform of how things are handled is needed, but I'm not sure there is only one option on this front.
You are bringing two distinct arguments to the same table here.
I'm against religion as a rule to live by. We can happily discuss the reasons behind that if you want.
The purpose of your thread, from my inferences of it, seems to be exploring how a group can protect its own because an external government cannot. I find this to be a worthwhile thing to explore and why a particular group can do this whilst others seemingly cannot.
Ball's in your court person who throws about childish insults as if they hold any weight xD
there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin
Those mudslime cretins rape British children, get them addicted to heroin, profit from the rape industry they created with the aid of the State, then steal government benefits meant for the least fortunate British citizens.
That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
let the public decide if it is better than the current system
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
Dunno my dude. Religious group looking to keep order within their families so that there aren't any single mothers claiming benefits or troon teenagers shooting up heroin with a government ready and willing to support exactly those actions seems to be on the same side as many of the posters of communities.win.
I've witnessed these 'communities' deal with professional thieves in ways that the UK police can't or won't.
A reform of how things are handled is needed, but I'm not sure there is only one option on this front.
You are bringing two distinct arguments to the same table here.
I'm against religion as a rule to live by. We can happily discuss the reasons behind that if you want.
The purpose of your thread, from my inferences of it, seems to be exploring how a group can protect its own because an external government cannot. I find this to be a worthwhile thing to explore and why a particular group can do this whilst others seemingly cannot.
Ball's in your court person who throws about childish insults as if they hold any weight xD
Those mudslime cretins rape British children, get them addicted to heroin, profit from the rape industry they created with the aid of the State, then steal government benefits meant for the least fortunate British citizens.
Why do you not talk about this?
Sanity has entered the chat!
That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
Any of them insults landing yet tiger?
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
Many of their married women don't get legally married so they can claim benefits anyway.
All life takes advantage of exploits in systems to flourish. It's called opportunism and it's what separates us from pond algae.
Fix the system, not those able to gain from it.
Are you talking about Somalians, Tim Walz or Muslims?
Minnesota has all three, and it has pond scum too :)
Die immediately, dune coon.
Oh noes!