That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
let the public decide if it is better than the current system
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
feasible solution to Muslim led crimes
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.
Sanity has entered the chat!
That's a much better angle than the OPs attack on controls that actually work within that very group.
Rather than "Dem peoples are the devils!" use Sharia law and have it displayed openly. See how those criminal individuals would fare if that style of law was incorporated and then let the public decide if it is better than the current system or not.
Once it is noted that it is individuals, not Muslims, who are breaking both laws it's only a matter of seeing how else works along with these individuals and you won't have to look beyond the current Prime Minister and everyone around him to see why things are the way they currently are and why Sharia law wouldn't allow for it.
Any of them insults landing yet tiger?
Ah, you believe little internet ticks and crosses.
That's sweet :)
Back when the internet was made up of opinion and facts which supported them, we could get some proper talking done and solutions found.
Why don't you pop back across to le reddit and have fun with your ups and downs?
So your solution is to let a paki-compromised government with a documented history of ignoring petitions from British people oversee a "vote" from a society flooded with violent mudslimes. Moloch-worshipping savages who have no issue with committing mass murder to force people to 'accept islam or else'.
You do realize that'd just cement the grip sharia law has on britain, right?
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.